Pillar Iv: Advancing Knowledge For Era
HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2026-06-ERA-08
- Programme
- Enhancing the European R&I system
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Open (31094502)
- Opening Date
- December 10, 2025
- Deadline
- March 12, 2026
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €4,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 2
- Keywords
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2026-06-ERA-08HORIZON-WIDERA-2026-06
Description
Scope:
This topic aims to generate new information and knowledge contributing to strengthening the evidence base for advancing the ERA. Applicants should propose diverse R&I activities that can support the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of ERA policies and practices.
Applicants should select and clearly identify one area being addressed, choosing from the six areas outlined below. Each area is designed to contribute toward the implementation of an ERA policy: Area 1 – ERA Structural Policy “Enabling open science via sharing and re-use of data, including through EOSC”; Area 2 – ERA Action “A coordinated framework responding to emerging challenges for ethics and integrity in R&I”; Area 3 and Area 4 – ERA Structural Policy “Strengthening gender equality and inclusiveness in the ERA"; Area 5 and Area 6 – ERA Structural Policy “Making research careers more attractive and sustainable and support mobility”. Proposals should develop all the activities outlined for the selected area, as well as additional activities contributing to the selected area’s expected outcomes.
In project activities, particular attention should be paid to promoting inclusive gender equality and addressing gender-specific challenges.
Expected project duration is up to 3 years without prejudice to a longer duration if justified.
Area 1: Assessing reproducibility in research by direct replication of scientific findings
Expected outcome: Proposals under Area 1 will deliver on the impact “Increased reproducibility, trustworthiness and transparency of scientific research”, contributing to the ERA Structural Policy “Enabling open science via sharing and re-use of data, including through EOSC”. Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- New knowledge and methodologies through independent, direct replication studies of selected high-impact research findings are available to researchers, citizens, and policymakers;
- New innovative approaches are available to researchers and open science experts to conduct and incentivise the replication of scientific findings;
- Sustainable engagement and collaboration in replication of scientific findings have been established across research communities.
Scope: Area 1 aims to support the replication of significant findings across different scientific fields, addressing technical and societal challenges related to research reproducibility. Proposals must build on prior art in replication practices and demonstrate their capacity to perform and conclude the replication of the findings within the means and duration of the project. Funded actions are expected to adhere to the best practices in open science and reproducibility.
Activities should involve all relevant actors, including researchers, scientific service and infrastructure providers, and open science experts. To achieve the expected outcomes, proposals should address the activities outlined below and propose any additional, complementary activities:
- Conduct independent, direct replication of the findings of specified high-impact, influential studies from selected research domains, using state-of-the-art methodologies; these should cover both experimental and computational studies, including cases where the original findings have been controversial, or where replication studies are needed to confirm or refine the results;
- Develop innovative approaches to replication studies and solutions that can be generalised or adapted to multiple fields, considering the distinct challenges of different scientific fields and the challenges that cut across the selected research domains;
- Assess the findings of the replication studies and develop and disseminate best practices and concrete, field-specific recommendations for increased reproducibility of scientific findings, based on the replication studies, as well as policy-related recommendations;
- Develop and test innovative models to incentivise researchers to participate in replication studies;
- Foster community-building to support long-term collaborations on replication practices.
Area 2: Ethics of emerging technologies with high socio-economic impact: space exploration/exploitation
Expected outcome: Proposals under Area 2 will deliver on the impact “A research ethics and integrity ecosystem enhanced with robust methodologies and knowledge in the field of space exploration/exploitation”, contributing to the ERA Action “A coordinated framework responding to emerging challenges for ethics and integrity in R&I”. Project results are expected to contribute to the following outcomes:
- Researchers and ethics professionals have generated new knowledge about the ethical and societal impact of emerging technologies in space exploration/exploitation;
- A robust ethics and integrity framework supports researchers, ethics experts, and policy makers in applying responsible governance to emerging technologies in space exploration/exploitation;
- Key stakeholders, e.g., policymakers, researchers, innovators, and the public, have increased awareness and understanding of the ethical aspects of emerging technologies in space exploration/exploitation.
Scope: Area 2 aims to define the ethical challenges and design a robust framework to address the risks to fundamental rights, human integrity, and environmental harm of space exploration/exploitation.
Proposals should build on the results of relevant past or ongoing initiatives and projects at European and/or national level addressing ethics-related aspects.[1] Proposals should include structured cooperation with the Embassy of Good Science,[2] as well as relevant European networks[3], and liaise with international initiatives (e.g., UNESCO). Actions should target researchers, ethics experts, members of national and local ethics committees/bodies, policy makers, and the general public. To achieve the expected outcomes, proposals should address the activities outlined below and propose any additional, complementary activities:
- Identify and study the ethical challenges and implications in relation to R&I on space exploration and exploitation, e.g., the risks and benefits for the integrity and dignity of human beings, approaches to minimise harm and maximise beneficence, and approaches to ensure a responsible and sustainable use of space resources;
- Develop a robust research and integrity framework and training materials to support actors at the EU, national, and local levels in applying an ‘ethics by design’ principle;
- Develop and implement communication tools to provide open and transparent information on project outcomes to enable public trust.
Area 3: Mapping and promoting inclusive gender equality and policies in R&D intensive firms
Expected outcome: Proposals under Area 3 will deliver on the impact “Enhanced gender equality and inclusiveness, leading to research excellence and more innovative, socially relevant, and economically impactful outcomes”, contributing to the ERA Structural Policy “Strengthening gender equality and inclusiveness in the ERA”. Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Better understanding by researchers, research organisations, ERA stakeholders, and policymakers of the current state of inclusive gender equality in R&D intensive firms;
- Researchers, research organisations, ERA stakeholders, and policymakers have access to effective methods, strategies, and tools to overcome the challenges and to promote and support the adoption of inclusive gender equality policies in R&D intensive firms;
- Increased capacity of R&D intensive firms to implement inclusive gender equality plans, policies and practices.
Scope: Area 3 aims at increasing knowledge on policies and strategies addressing persistent gender and diversity gaps in R&D intensive firms[4].
Project activities should target research performing organisations, higher education organisations, and other R&I stakeholders (networks, etc.). Participation of private sector organisations, including R&D intensive firms, is encouraged. Proposals should build on and complement outcomes of any relevant past or ongoing initiatives and projects[5].
Proposals are invited to focus on specific (sub)fields of research and development[6] with persisting gender and diversity gaps, focusing in particular on small and medium-sized enterprises, start-ups, and scale-ups. To achieve the expected outcomes, proposals should address the activities outlined below and propose any additional, complementary activities:
- Comprehensively map inclusive gender equality policies and practices in R&D intensive firms, involving a literature review, data collection and analysis, and identify gaps, challenges, needs, impacts, and conditions that enable or hinder their implementation;
- Explore methods and strategies to overcome the challenges and enhance the engagement of R&D intensive firms in actions aimed at increasing the participation of women and underrepresented groups;
- Develop and disseminate tailored capacity building, tools, and resources for R&D intensive firms that facilitate adoption and effective implementation of inclusive gender equality plans, policies and practices.
Area 4: Advancing gender-responsive R&I through budgeting, expenditure tracking, and evaluation of the sex and/or gender analysis in R&I content
Expected outcome: Proposals under Area 4 will deliver on the impact “Enhanced gender equality and inclusiveness, leading to research excellence and more innovative, socially relevant, and economically impactful outcomes”, contributing to the ERA Structural Policy “Strengthening inclusive and intersectional gender equality in the ERA”. Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Research organisations and policymakers at national and EU level have improved capacity to monitor, evaluate, and strengthen the integration of the gender dimension, including an intersectional perspective, in R&I content;
- Research organisations at national and EU level have access to standardised principles, methodologies, and tools for gender-responsive budgeting and expenditure tracking;
- Stakeholders and policymakers benefit from improved access to high-quality disaggregated data and transparent reporting on the gender dimension in R&I content, including an intersectional perspective, and in R&I expenditure, supporting more inclusive decision-making and socially relevant innovations.
Scope: Area 4 aims to define principles and develop a methodology for gender budgeting and expenditure tracking in R&I, and to develop a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation approach to assess the integration of gender dimension in R&I content, including the intersectional perspective.
Project activities should target research performing and funding organisations, higher education institutions, research infrastructures, and public bodies. Proposals should build on the results of relevant past or ongoing initiatives and projects[7]. To achieve the expected outcomes, proposals should address the activities outlined below and propose any additional, complementary activities:
- Review existing knowledge, frameworks, and practices employed by relevant stakeholders;
- By 2027, in collaboration with the ERA Forum sub-group on inclusive gender equality[8], develop: 1) guidelines, criteria, and metrics to assess and guide the integration of the gender dimension in R&I content and 2) principles for gender budgeting and expenditure tracking, including a standardised methodology, with an intersectional approach to be applied to both;
- Design monitoring and reporting mechanisms, such as a publicly accessible database, that provide disaggregated data on gender equality and intersectional characteristics in R&I expenditure and showcase related outcomes;
- Cooperate with key stakeholders, employ engagement activities and participatory approaches to involve under-represented groups, where relevant, and build capacity and foster mutual learning through targeted workshops, seminars, and training sessions.
Area 5: Assessing trends and effects of research careers in the private sector and of inter-sectoral research careers
Expected outcome: Proposals under Area 5 will deliver on the impact “Improved career research careers and mobility on the basis of the European framework for research careers, fostering knowledge flows and career interoperability across sectors and countries”, contributing to the ERA Structural Policy “Making research careers more attractive and sustainable and support mobility”. Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Improved knowledge regarding the structure and deployment of research careers in the private business sector and of careers that deploy across various sectors;
- Better awareness of the types of knowledge flows triggered by inter-sectoral mobility and careers;
- Stakeholders and policymakers benefit from an improved set of tools to conceptualise, measure, and assess research careers in the private business sector and careers that span across various sectors.
Scope: Area 5 aims to build new evidence to support informed policymaking, with the potential to foster the interoperability of research careers across sectors and countries, and broaden the spectrum of research career opportunities.
The objective is to collect empirical and conceptual knowledge on the specific characteristics and career trends of EU-based researchers working in the private business sector (56.5% of total employed researchers[9]). Universities and other research performing organisations are expected to implement the activities in cooperation with business sector actors, where relevant. Results should benefit policymakers, as well as research organisations and individual researchers. To achieve the expected outcomes, proposals should address the activities outlined below and propose any additional, complementary activities:
- Conduct quantitative and/or qualitative analyses which may build on or complement the insights and data provided by the Research and Innovation Careers Observatory[10];
- Analyse the logics underpinning research careers in the private sector, as well as those spanning over private and public sectors;
- Analyse the role played by research careers in the private sector and the intersectoral mobility of researchers in the diffusion and valorisation of knowledge across the ERA;
- Provide policy recommendations to improve the attractiveness and interoperability of research careers.
Area 6: Mapping international research careers and talent flows
Expected outcome: Proposals under Area 6 will deliver on the impact of “Improved career research careers and mobility on the basis of the European framework for research careers, fostering knowledge flows and career interoperability across sectors and countries”, contributing to the ERA Structural Policy “Making research careers more attractive and sustainable and support mobility”. Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Improved knowledge regarding the role played by research collaboration networks, which span across the EU and the rest of the world, in the configuration of research careers;
- Stakeholders and policymakers benefit from a better understanding of the international dimension of research careers and the impact these careers, in turn, have in shaping research collaboration networks and knowledge flows.
Scope: International research communities and networks provide the scope for research careers that deploy internationally, which in turn may contribute to strengthening international ties and communities.
Area 6 aims at increasing empirical and conceptual knowledge regarding this co-evolution between stable international research collaboration networks[11] and international research careers. Applicants may propose a variety of empirical approaches and strategies, for example, the mapping of collaborative projects structures and international co-publication networks, or the design of specific case studies.
Universities and other research performing organisations are expected to implement the action, in cooperation with additional stakeholders, where relevant. Results should benefit policymakers in national and international administrations, as well as research organisations and individual researchers. To achieve the expected outcomes, proposals should address the activities outlined below and propose any additional, complementary activities:
- Analyse the relevance of research collaboration networks involving the EU and Associated and/or third countries in the shaping of research careers across the world and in the EU's capacity to build and attract research talent;
- Analyse the relevance of careers deploying within such global research collaboration networks in the development of the international collaboration ties and in encouraging knowledge flows across the EU and the rest of the world;
- Provide policy recommendations at European, national and stakeholders level to improve the attractiveness of research careers.
[1] For example, projects funded under H2020_SwafS-18-2016, HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-12.
[2] The Embassy of Good Science is the one-stop-shop platform supported by the European Commission for sharing knowledge and training tools on ethics and research integrity, https://embassy.science/wiki/Main_Page.
[3] E.g., European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC), European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities (ALLEA).
[4] See, e.g., The 2024 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard.
[5] Including projects funded under SwafS-26-2020, HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ERA-01-80, and HORIZON-WIDERA-2022-ERA-01-80.
[6] Refer to Frascati Manual: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2015/10/frascati-manual-2015_g1g57dcb/9789264239012-en.pdf.
[7] Including projects funded under SwafS-02-2016, SwafS-08-2017, HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ERA-01-80, HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ERA-01-81; projects BUDGET IT (funded under HORIZON-WIDERA-2022-ERA-01-81) and LeTSGEPs (funded under SwafS-09-2018-2019-2020); GEAM tool.
[8] See the Commission expert group, https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=103813.
[9] EUROSTAT Data, Researchers by sectors of performance – full time equivalent. Latest data available from 2023, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/rd_p_persocc/default/table?lang=en.
[10] https://ec.europa.eu/era-talent-platform/reico/.
[11] Stable international research collaboration networks are to be intended as medium to long-term networks, involving, for example, researchers and research performing organisations. Short-term initiatives, such as a standalone project of limited duration, should not be considered as a stable research network.
Destination & Scope
The guiding policy framework of this destination is the Communication "A New ERA for Research and Innovation"[1], the Council Recommendation on the Pact for Research and Innovation in Europe (Pact for R&I)[2], and the European Research Area (ERA) Policy Agenda (2025-2027)[3]. The funded actions will strengthen the ERA by promoting the freedom of movement of researchers, scientific knowledge, and technology and by providing new evidence for better-informed policymaking. More details on the ERA policy framework are in the introduction to the WIDERA work programme 2026-2027.
The EU Member States, Associated Countries, R&I stakeholders, and the Commission work together to implement the ERA. This process is steered by the ERA Policy Agenda, which identifies specific ERA Actions (time-limited initiatives) and Structural Policies (long-term policies) designed to tackle concrete challenges faced by R&I communities in Europe. This work programme is designed to support this process. The funded actions will build knowledge and capacities at the level of institutions and ecosystems to adopt reforms and practices in line with the ERA Policy Agenda, thereby contributing to the implementation of the ERA.
The destination will be implemented in synergy with the European Higher Education Area and the European Education Area, especially in relation to R&I careers and institutional changes in universities and research organisations. Several call topics and other actions will also contribute to the implementation of the European framework for research careers[4].
The destination includes two calls with 13 topics in total as well as other actions, targeting a wide range of R&I stakeholders, e.g., universities, research performing and funding organisations, research evaluation agencies, networks of researchers, publishers, industry and start-ups, policymakers, local authorities, and public bodies.
The effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines is encouraged under this destination, including the involvement of SSH experts, institutions, and the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, to enhance the societal impact of project activities.
The ERA Platform showcases results from Horizon Europe-funded projects, making them available to a wide range of stakeholders to facilitate progress in ERA policy areas. Applicants are encouraged to consider these results as well as propose new tools, resources, and visual material that can be featured on the platform.
All topics in the 2026 and 2027 ERA calls are organised around four pillars, designed to enable the funded projects to strengthen R&I capacities across four complementary dimensions while addressing selected ERA Actions and Structural Policies. The table below summarises this approach, making it easier for applicants to choose their preferred policy area and type of activity. Each call topic title refers to its corresponding pillar.
2026 and 2027 ERA calls: pillar structure
| Pillar I: Institutional changes for ERA | Pillar II: Ecosystems for ERA |
| Type: coordination and support actions Focus: capacity building and support to foster adoption of ERA policies/practices within institutions. Activity types: providing tools, resources, training, services, and policy advice. Policy areas:
| Type: coordination and support actions Focus: building and reinforcing networks and partnerships to foster broad uptake of ERA policies/practices. Activity types: exchanging knowledge and practice, networking and cooperative actions. Policy areas:
|
| Pillar III: Citizens and science in ERA | Pillar IV: New knowledge for ERA |
| Type: coordination and support actions Focus: connecting R&I with citizens and other stakeholders. Activity types: implementing and promoting participatory approaches, such as citizen engagement and citizen science. Policy areas:
| Type: research and innovation actions Focus: creating new knowledge that supports design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of policies and practices. Activity types: conducting analyses, developing and testing new methods and practices. Policy areas:
|
Proposals under this destination should set out a credible pathway to one or several of the following expected impacts:
- Effective and sustainable structural institutional changes aligned with the ERA priorities;
- Sustainable ecosystems established around the ERA priorities through enhanced cooperation, coordination and alignment;
- Increased trust in science and alignment of R&I with society’s needs;
- Strengthened evidence base for advancing the implementation of the ERA;
- Increased reproducibility, trustworthiness and transparency of scientific research;
- A more open, equitable and inclusive research and innovation ecosystem;
- A research ethics and integrity ecosystem continually enhanced with robust methodologies that encourage benefit sharing and prevent ethics dumping;
- Systemic reform of research assessment through the recognition of the diverse outputs, practices, and activities which maximise the quality and impact of research;
- Improved research careers and mobility, based on the European framework for research careers, fostering knowledge flows and career interoperability across sectors and countries;
- Stronger translation of R&I results into society and economy;
- Enhanced gender equality and inclusiveness, leading to research excellence and more innovative, socially relevant, and economically impactful outcomes;
- Increased uptake, effectiveness and impact of environmentally sustainable research;
- More resilient and future-proof R&I policies and long-term strategies with effectively integrated strategic intelligence and strengthened foresight communities;
- A more strategic, coherent, and evidence-based approach towards cooperation with China in the area of science, technology, and innovation.
[1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0628&from=EN.
[2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32021H2122.
[3] https://european-research-area.ec.europa.eu/era-policy-agenda-2025-2027.
[4] Council Recommendation of 18 December 2023 on a European framework to attract and retain research, innovation and entrepreneurial talents in Europe, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1640/oj.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
To ensure a balanced portfolio covering different ERA policy areas, as outlined in the expected outcomes and scope, grants will be awarded to proposals not only in order of ranking, but at least also to proposals that are the highest ranked within each area, provided that proposals pass all thresholds.
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
The following additions to the general award criteria apply: The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
described in the specific topic of the Work Programme.
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 15. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Decision authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Frequently Asked Questions About Pillar Iv: Advancing Knowledge For Era
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
If your lump sum budget contains any cost items in cost category C and/or D, please make sure to justify these items in the ‘Any comments’ sheet of the Excel detailed lump sum budget table.
The reason is that we simplified the proposal template, removing this information from Part B and bringing it closer to the relevant budget items.
Specifically, you must include justification in the ‘Any comments’ sheet if you are in any of the following situations:
- If the sum of the costs for ’travel and subsistence’, ‘equipment’, and ‘other goods, works and services’ (i.e. the purchase costs) exceeds 15% of the personnel costs for a participant. If this is the case, justify the most expensive cost item(s) up to the level that the remaining costs are below 15% of personnel costs.
- If other cost categories (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services) are used.
- If in-kind contributions are used (non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties, which must be included as direct costs in the corresponding cost category, e.g. personnel costs or purchase costs for equipment).