Teaming for Excellence
HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01-01-two-stage
- Programme
- Teaming for Excellence
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- December 3, 2024
- Deadline
- April 10, 2025
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €270,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €8,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €15,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 18
- Keywords
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01-01-two-stageHORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01
Description
Disparities in R&I performance are due to, among other reasons, the insufficient critical mass of science and lack of centres of excellence having sufficient competence to engage countries and regions strategically in a path of innovative growth. Teaming is responding to this challenge establishing new centres of excellence or modernising existing ones with the help of leading EU or AC partnering institutions. This will help countries to increase their R&I intensity and to attain a competitive position in the European R&I system and globally, especially by becoming drivers of change.
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Increased scientific capabilities of the coordinating institution and the host country enabling the coordinator and other potential entities from that country to successfully apply for competitive funding in the European Union and globally;
- Improved the R&I culture of the country hosting the co-ordinator (indicators such as research intensity, innovation performance, values towards R&I) through centres of excellence as lighthouses and role models;
- Stimulus for institutional and systemic reforms and R&I investments at national level taking into account the enabling conditions on governance of smart specialisation introduced under cohesion policy programmes as far as applicable;
- Strengthened and mutually benefitting collaboration with partners from leading scientific institutions from abroad;
- Development and promotion of new research strands in relevant domains;
- Developed and enhanced research and innovation capacities and the uptake of advanced technologies;
- Contribution to the achievement of the specific objectives of the supporting national/regional/EU programme as complementary funding;
- Enhanced innovation and integration of planned processes, services and products of the centre;
- Enhanced co-operation and synergies with other European projects.
Teaming is one of the actions that stimulates the European Union to exploit its potential by maximising and spreading the benefits of research and innovation. It is vital for its competitiveness and its ability to address societal challenges.
The Teaming action is designed to support the creation of new centres of excellence or modernising the existing ones in low R&I performing countries (except those centres of excellence that have already benefitted from previous Teaming calls). It is building on partnerships between leading scientific institutions in the European landscape and the main beneficiary institutions in low R&I performing countries that display the willingness to engage together for this purpose. This can help countries that are lagging behind in terms of research and innovation performance attaining a competitive position in the global value chains. Leading scientific institutions are established strategic partners that have developed an outstanding reputation in research and innovation excellence in the chosen scientific domain. Institutions that are still in the process of development or modernisation, e.g., those that are still receiving support as coordinators from widening actions under Horizon 2020 or Horizon Europe, are normally not considered leading institutions, unless a proper justification is provided in the proposal.
In order to maximise impact of research and innovation on society, environment and economy at large and to contribute in particular to the achievement of the European Union’s objectives, funding must be coherent and work in synergy. This notion is highly relevant for the Teaming action, where a complementary source of funding from a national (or regional or European or private source) is required. The implementation of Teaming action is expected to become an influential and meaningful bridge particularly between smart specialisation strategies and excellence in R&I with the aim of strengthening the European Research Area and contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals.
Whatever the source of the required complementary source of funding, a Teaming project, as a notable flagship in its host country, exemplifies not only the achievements in R&I, capacity building or competitiveness, but also sets and facilitates synergies in practice.
The evaluation of the complementary source of funding part may use additional criteria required by, where relevant, the Cohesion Policy programmes and/or legislation. The managers of the complementary funding should apply to the operations the categories, maximum amounts and methods of calculation of eligible costs established under Horizon Europe. In addition, they should be able to apply Art.25 (d) of the revised General Block Exemption Regulation.
Proposals may be evaluated by an additional panel of experts with specific knowledge on complementary funding sources.
In the first stage of evaluation the R&I excellence and the conceptual approach for the centres of excellence will be evaluated. Applicants should present a strategic vision on how to develop R&I excellence beyond the state of the art in the chosen domain and on how the co-ordinator will benefit from the partnership with a leading institution from abroad. In case of modernisation of an existing centre, the proposal should clearly indicate the development path from the initial baseline situation until the end of the project and its justification. In addition, the conceptual approach should outline how the access to complementary funding from other sources will be ensured, in the respect of national, regional and/or European strategies or policy priorities (e.g., notably smart specialisation strategies, Green Deal, Digital transformation). Proposals also should sketch out briefly how the autonomy of the envisaged centre will be ensured and the necessary human resources recruited and retained.
Proposals invited to the second stage must include an investment plan for the full project including a binding commitment for the necessary complementary funding.
At a detailed level the full proposal should:
- Present a strategy for how the centre will develop excellence in the chosen relevant R&I domain that will put it at the competitive edge beyond the state of the art enabling future success in competitive calls;
- Demonstrate the growth potential and expected socio-economic outreach of the Centre of Excellence for the benefit of the host country or region;
- Demonstrate how the project will contribute to encouraging and supporting reforms of the R&I system at regional and or/national level;
- Elaborate on the structure of the consortium and how this will create a win-win situation;
- Demonstrate how the newly established/modernised centre will have full autonomy in decision-making. In particular, the centre of excellence should have the maximum degree of autonomy in terms of taking its own decisions, being in legal, administrative, operational, personnel and academic matters. The Centre should be able to fix and pay competitive salaries for its personnel;
- Elaborate on the steps that will be taken to ensure long-term self-sustainability after the end of the Horizon Europe grant;
- In case of modernisation of an existing centre, convincingly elaborate on the development path from the initial baseline situation until the end of the project;
- Propose a robust human resource strategy that addresses gender equality (in line with the research institutions respective gender equality plans) and international component, ensuring appropriate management capacities for the effective and efficient running of the centre of excellence;
- In order to assure the autonomy of the centre of excellence, if relevant, the project might benefit of having the centre of excellence coordinating the project within the duration of the Grant;
- Present an investment plan including the letter(s) of commitment for complementary funding from the competent national/regional authorities or private sources to commit financial resources (e.g., resources coming from programmes co-financed by the ERDF (European regional development fund), IPA (Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance) or other sources) for implementing the future centre, in particular regarding investment in infrastructure and equipment. The letter(s) of commitment for complementary funding of the project will be an integral part of the evaluation of the proposal;
- The grant awarded from the Horizon Europe budget should provide substantial support for the start-up and implementation phase of the future centre of excellence including the recruitment of the managerial, technical and scientific personnel. It should also cover expenses related to team members of the future centre of excellence (e.g., their salaries, recruitment costs[1], management costs, travel and subsistence costs);
- All recruitments have to follow a transparent, merit based and open recruitment procedures;
- A minor research component can be accepted not exceeding 10% of the total Horizon Europe grant that may include a preparatory research project. Such small research project embedded in the Teaming action should be aligned with the objectives of the project and e.g., serve the purpose of developing and testing new methodologies and instruments and/or the integration of new scientific personnel. If preparatory research activity is planned to be carried out, the outline of a respective work plan with an appropriate level of detail should be presented;
- The duration of the project should be up to six years.
Proposals should illustrate quantitatively and qualitatively the expected potential impact of the project and its expected results in terms of new local and international research and innovation partnerships, institutional and/or R&I system changes (various levels), increased research intensity (i.e. new scientific publications directly linked to the project’s area, protected IPR). Proposals are encouraged to choose any additional relevant indicators that will be used for measuring the impacts achieved.
The JRC, as non-funded member of the consortium selected for funding or as an associated partner, can contribute to the action with specific expertise, where relevant, for the development of R&I strategies depending on the R&I domain chosen by the project, technology transfer and IPR management as well as linking up to regional smart specialisation strategy.
Specific attention should be paid to gender equality objectives, in line with the organisations’ commitments through their adopted gender equality plans, and in line with the European Research Area objectives.
[1] This can be considered under the category of ‘other goods, works and services’
Destination & Scope
Introduction
The ERA Communication [1] established the need to improve access to excellence as one of the four main strategic goals. Striving towards excellence requires a stronger R&I system where best practice is disseminated faster across the European Union. The strategic plan for Horizon Europe aims to underpin geographical diversity, building the necessary capacity to allow successful participation in the R&I process and to promote networking and access to excellence thus optimising the impact of Pillar 2 and contributing to the objectives of the entire programme.
This destination will address “improving access to excellence” through a portfolio of complementary actions that aim to build up R&I capacities in Widening countries, as well as through national and regional R&I reforms and investments, to enable them to advance to the competitive edge at European and international level. It will contribute to the development of a pan European innovation ecosystem and thus to innovation. This portfolio also constitutes the widening dimension of a broader European Excellence Initiative that reaches out beyond this programme as it is implemented in conjunction with ERASMUS+.
Each of the seven proposed calls addresses a different target group of potential beneficiaries with a customised intervention logic. The use and appropriate design of partnerships with leading institutions abroad will be a key driver for accessing excellence. The intervention logic is designed to work points at a multitude of scales ranging from individual researcher through career development, focused networks, institutional development to a systemic impact on national R&I systems.
Capacity building will go beyond purely scientific scope as it encompasses the development of management and administrative competencies for the benefit of institutions (notably in Twinning and the European Excellence Initiative) eager to take over consortium leadership roles especially under Pillar 2. Teaming actions will create new or modernise existing centres of excellence by means of close and strategic partnerships with leading institutions abroad. The impact will be amplified by the conditionality of securing complementary investment (especially for infrastructure, building, hardware) from the structural funds or other sources. Once established the centres will function as lighthouses with far reaching impact and role models for attracting the best talents. Furthermore, they will demonstrate the success of modern governance and management, and thus stimulate generalised reforms in the national R&I landscape.
Two new actions will complement this portfolio as catalysts for better impact and sustainability of the widening actions. The dissemination and exploitation support facility will help beneficiaries of widening actions to improve the effectiveness of their dissemination and exploitation and unlock new sources of funding. The pathways to excellence scheme will unlock synergies of Horizon projects with funds under the cohesion policy in Widening countries.
In a complementary manner with a focus on the academic and higher education system, the university-related scheme will foster reforms in Widening countries embedded in dynamic university alliances in Europe. Scientific excellence in the more traditional sense is the aim of Twinning where focused networks with excellent partners will develop new promising R&I domains and test novel approaches in smaller joint research projects.
Innovation excellence is the focus of excellence hubs where innovation ecosystems in Widening countries and beyond will team up and strive to create better links between academia, business, government and society that will foster a real placed-based innovation culture in Widening countries based on a strategic agenda in line with regional or national smart specialisation strategies. In this context, synergies will be sought with the programme parts of the European Innovation Ecosystems and the European Institute of Innovation & Technology (EIT).
In addition, particular attention will be paid to cross-cutting objectives set for Horizon Europe, such as gender equality and open science practices, through the different funded actions.
Expected impact
Proposals for topics under this Destination should set out a credible pathway to contribute to the following expected impacts:
- Increased science and innovation capacity for all actors in the R&I system in Widening countries;
- Structural changes leading to modernised and more competitive R&I systems in eligible countries;
- Reformed R&I systems and institutions leading to increased attractiveness and retention of research talents;
- Mobilisation of national and EU resources for strategic investments;
- Higher participation success in Horizon Europe and more consortium leadership roles;
- Stronger links between academia and business and improved career permeability;
- Strengthened role of the Higher Education sector in research and innovation;
- Greater involvement of regional actors in the R&I process;
- Improved outreach to international level for all actors.
[1] (COM(2020) 628 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0628&from=EN)
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
In order to achieve the expected outcomes, participation as coordinators to the call is limited to legal entities established in Widening countries, as defined in the Horizon Europe regulation.
A Teaming project must involve at least two beneficiaries:
a) the main applicant organisation (the coordinator) which will be a university or a research organisation or a for-profit organisation that carries out research and/or technological development as its main objective, a national or regional authority or a research funding agency, established in a Widening country, and
b) at least one leading university or research organisation established in another Member State or Associated Country as an advanced partner.
The project must have a source of funding complementary to the Horizon Europe funding (e.g., national and/or regional funding, European funding, such as from Cohesion policy programmes, or private sources). Its total amount must at least equal the total requested Horizon Europe contribution and be disbursed within the duration of the project.
A clear description of the project part supported by complementary funding must be included in the proposal, where relevant including the eligible category of research and development, technical specifications of infrastructure, preliminary planning for building and installations, cost-benefit analysis, etc.
In kind contributions are not considered complementary funding.
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) may participate as member of the consortium selected for funding.
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes
The following rules for dealing with ex-aequo applications apply: in the first place, ex-aequo proposals will be prioritised according to geographical diversity criteria, defined as proposals with coordinators established in a Widening Country, not otherwise represented as coordinator higher up the ranking list. The method described in Points 1), 2), 3) and 5) of General Annexes Part F (Procedure/Evaluation procedure and ranking) will then be applied to the remaining equally ranking proposals in the group. This rule establishing the priority order serves to better spread the impact of the action and to strengthen the efficiency of the ‘Widening participation and spreading excellence’ programme.
Since funding for projects funded under this topic is coming from more than one source, this action is an EU Synergy grant and the following conditions will apply:
The project proposal will undergo a joint evaluation of both project parts funded under Horizon Europe and under any chosen complementary source of funding, such as from Cohesion policy programmes. The operations supported by a complementary source of funding must comply with the scope of the supporting programme, and they must provide an effective contribution to the achievement of programme’s specific objectives. In addition, when Cohesion policy funding is mobilised, it must be consistent with the relevant smart specialisation strategy.
Seals of Excellence will be awarded to applications exceeding all of the evaluation thresholds set out in this work programme, but cannot be funded due to lack of budget available to the call.
- Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
- Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
- Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the specific section HORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01-01-two-stage: "Teaming for Excellence" of the Work Programme 2023-2025 (Widening Participation and Strengthening the European Research Area).
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE CSA)
Standard application form (HE CSA Stage 1) — note that section "Guidance for blind evaluations" (page 2) does not apply to this call.
Standard evaluation form — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA Stage 1)
MGA
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 14. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
EVALUATION results
Call publication date: 18/04/2024
Amendment publication date: 02/12/2024
Opening date: 03/12/2024
Closing date: 10/04/2025
Available budget: EUR 270.000.000,00
Evaluation results:
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’.
-The individual threshold for each criteria was 4 points (out of 5).
-The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for the call, at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget). The overall threshold was 9 points (out of 10).
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
- Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 340
- Number of inadmissible proposals: 0
- Number of ineligible proposals: 22
- Number of withdrawn proposals: 1
- Number of proposals invited to stage 2: 67
Total budget requested for proposals invited to stage 2: 907.945.875 EUR
Summary of Observer report:
The evaluation of proposals submitted to the call HORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01-01 (Teaming for Excellence – Stage 1) was conducted between early May and the end of June 2025. Out of 340 proposals submitted, 317 were found eligible and evaluated under Horizon Europe’s rules for two-stage Coordination and Support Actions (CSA); 22 were declared ineligible by REA services, and 1 was withdrawn by the applicant. The evaluation was implemented under the supervision of REA.C.3, supported by 15 Project Officers, and involved 158 contracted Evaluators, 59 Rapporteurs, 58 Vice-Chairs, and one Independent Observer.
Each proposal was reviewed by three independent experts, followed by a consensus process led by a Rapporteur and moderated by a Vice-Chair. Experts were assigned between 3 and 8 proposals each, with Rapporteurs and Vice-Chairs typically handling 4 to 7. The process combined asynchronous work using the Commission’s SEP platform with targeted live consensus meetings via WebEx. The workflow allowed for effective expert collaboration, and proposals flagged as resubmissions were explicitly cross-checked for consistency with previous evaluations.
The evaluation was conducted with transparency, fairness, and procedural integrity. All proposals were assessed solely on their merits, using the published criteria. However, several experts noted limitations of the SEP platform, particularly regarding the user interface for collaborative drafting, the structure of the chat function for consensus discussions, and the risk of content loss during late-stage quality control. These issues were mitigated through recovery efforts but merit structural resolution.
The result is a ranked list of 67 proposals invited to submit full applications in Stage 2. The process provided a fair and credible basis for the next phase of this important call.
Applicants will be informed about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation:
EXCELLENCE
Strategic Vision:
- state-of-the-art not suitably referenced and advancement beyond the state-of-the-art not convincingly demonstrated
- insufficient benefits for the CoE from the partnership with leading organisation(s)
Methodology & Support Measures:
- methodological approaches not aligned with the objectives
- added value of coordination and support measures not sufficiently justified
Complementary Funding:
- misalignment of the additional co-funding with the project’s objectives
- insufficient alignment with EU priorities or lack of synergy with national priorities
- source of funding is linked to a national competitive call including a separate evaluation
Human Resources Strategy:
- HR strategies for staff recruitment and retention not appropriately addressed (lack of concrete and attractive incentives)
Governance and Autonomy of the CoE:
- transitional measures to gradually establish self-governance from setup to full operation in key fields (administrative, operational, financial, legal..) are not sufficiently detailed
- governance structures insufficiently detailed, lacking clear definition of roles, responsibilities, and decision-making processes.
IMPACT
Outcomes and Impacts:
- insufficient correlation between expected outcomes & impacts, with projects’ planned objectives and identified target groups
External barriers and mitigation:
- insufficient identification of potential external barriers, in particular regulatory/legal challenges
- incomplete articulation with relevant mitigation measures
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
- Please bear in mind that your full proposal will be evaluated more in-depth and by an extended group of independent external experts.
- Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
The Teaming for Excellence call (HORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01-two stage_stage1 closed on 10/04/2025.The number of registrations/submissions is the following:
Submitted: 340
Draft: 224
Deleted: 179
Withdrawn: 0
Total: 743
Evaluations results will be communicated to applicants towards the end of July 2025.
Please note that the call HORIZON-WIDERA-2025-ACCESS-01-01-two-stage is not subject to a blind evaluation. As indicated under "call documents" of the call page published on the Funding & Tenders Portal, the section "Guidance for blind evaluations" does not apply to this call. By mistake, a reference to blind evaluation (anonymity) was left in the proposal template Part B (available in the submission system) stating: "When describing the above, please pay attention to preserve the anonymity of the proposal". This is not applicable for this call.