Closed

Support to the development and implementation of policies and practices for reproducibility of scientific results

HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09
Programme
Enhancing the European R&I system
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
December 5, 2023
Deadline
March 11, 2024
Deadline Model
single-stage
Budget
€2,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€2,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€2,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
1
Keywords
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01EU research policy /Research policies in the EUSocial sciences, interdisciplinary

Description

Expected Outcome:

Projects are expected to contribute to the following expected outcomes:

  • Facilitated development, implementation and monitoring of interventions in research organisations that increase the reproducibility of scientific results;
  • More collaboration, joint actions by stakeholders, and mutual learning, notably between national reproducibility networks, to increase reproducibility of scientific results;
  • Greater alignment of policies and reduction in disparities between research organisations and between countries in terms of their attention to reproducibility of scientific results;
  • Facilitated development and implementation of training programmes and awareness raising.

These targeted outcomes in turn contribute to medium and long-term impacts:

  • Increased proportion of reproducible results;
  • Increased re-use of scientific results by research and innovation;
  • Greater quality of the scientific production.
Scope:

Increasing the reproducibility of scientific results, i.e., the possibility for scientists and the scientific community to obtain the same results as the originators, contributes to higher quality and more efficient research processes, more trustworthy results, increasing reuse by other researchers, more effective translation into innovations, and higher return on investments in research (see the scoping report “Reproducibility of scientific results in the EU[1]).

The aim of this topic is to facilitate the development and implementation of policies and practices, by research performing organisations, research funding organisations, learned societies and publishers that enhance reproducibility of scientific results. The action will support the mutual learning and dissemination of good practices between organisations across the European Union, as well as with relevant organisations outside the European Union, with broad disciplinary representation. It will build expertise and will support research organisations to develop and implement policies and interventions, and will coordinate efforts between stakeholders, notably between existing European national reproducibility networks. The action may facilitate the development of national networks in additional European countries. The action will support the development of training materials and training programmes, the mutual learning and exchange of practices and tools, and awareness raising, for researchers, reviewers and research organisations. The action will also put in place mechanisms to monitor the effects of policies and practices implemented, thus enabling future adaptations based on evidence gathered. In order to better achieve the expected outcomes, international cooperation is encouraged, in particular with third countries that are active in the development of policies and initiatives to increase the reproducibility of research results.

The action should build on the research results and recommendations from projects selected under call topic HORIZON-WIDERA-2022-ERA-01-41 that aims at understanding the underlying drivers of reproducibility and recommending effective interventions, as well as from other relevant projects and initiatives.

[1] https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/341654

Destination & Scope

Introduction

Horizon Europe has a new level of ambition – to maximise the impact of the European Union's research and innovation funding for European science, the economy and the wider society. It marks a paradigm change in the design of the European R&I framework programmes (FP) from an activity-driven to an impact-driven programme. Coupled to this ambition is the relaunch of the European Research Area (ERA) as described in the Commission Communication “A new ERA for Research and Innovation” (COM/2020/628 final of 30.09.2020).

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of R&I cooperation to provide solutions to society’s most demanding needs. With the priority on delivering Europe’s recovery as well as on the green and digital twin transitions, a new level of ambition, linking R&I better with the economy, and with education and training, is needed to match these challenges and put scientific knowledge to work.

The new ERA calls for deepening existing priorities and creating new initiatives by strengthening the mobility of researchers and the free flow of knowledge and technology, to improve access to excellence, boost market uptake and prioritise investment and reform. Working together has been the philosophy of the ERA since its launch; however, the green and digital transitions and the COVID recovery call for more and closer cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and stakeholders. They require the setting of new priorities, launching ambitious joint initiatives and developing common approaches between policies.

To address these requirements, Destination 3 of part 11 of the Horizon Europe work programme will support efforts to reform and enhance the European R&I system. Destination 3 is built around four strands corresponding to the four objectives set out in the ERA Communication:

  1. Prioritising investments and reforms in research and innovation;
  2. Improving access to excellence, progressing towards excellence across the whole EU and striving for stronger research and innovation systems;
  3. Translating R&I results into the economy to meet the digital and green transition objectives, and boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies;
  4. Deepening the ERA, to further progress the free circulation of knowledge and to ensure an upgraded, efficient and effective R&I system.

The principle of excellence, meaning that the best researchers with the best ideas that offer the best solutions to the societal challenges obtain funding, remains the cornerstone for all investments under the ERA.

Strand 1 recognises the importance of prioritising investments and reforms to accelerate the green and digital transformation and to increase competitiveness as well as the speed and depth of the recovery. It offers support for policy-makers and addresses the need for better analysis and evidence, including simplifying and facilitating the inter-play between national and European R&I systems.

Strand 2 addresses the need to improve access to excellence and to increase the performance of R&I systems, building on dedicated Horizon Europe measures as well as complementarities with smart specialisation strategies under the Cohesion Policy.

Strand 3 focuses on the importance of translating R&I results into the economy. R&I policies should aim to boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies.

Strand 4 addresses the challenge of deepening the ERA and includes Open Science, Higher Education and Researchers, Citizen Science, Science Education, Gender and Ethics. It aims at underpinning a new ERA benefitting from knowledge creation, circulation and use. This empowers higher education institutions and research organisations to embrace a transformative process; where a highly skilled workforce can circulate freely; and where research outputs are shared; where gender equality is assured; where the outcomes of R&I are understood, trusted and increasingly used, by educated informed scientists and citizens to the benefit of society.

Expected impact:

Proposals for topics under this Destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to the following expected impacts, focussing on those that are most relevant to the respective topic:

  1. Reform and enhance of the European R&I system;
  2. Prioritisation of investments and reforms, accomplish the recovery and the twin transitions;
  3. Improved access to excellence;
  4. High quality scientific production and stronger translation of R&I results into the economy;
  5. Deepen the ERA;
  6. Coordinated national and regional R&I programmes by pooling national resources and contributing to the alignment of national research and innovation policies;
  7. Improved knowledge for policy making about the networking patterns of research support staff and research management;
  8. Synergies between research & innovation and higher education policies and programmes;
  9. Modernised higher education sector, adressing higher education, research, and innovation;
  10. Increased number of interconnected knowledge ecosystems, strong in knowledge creation, circulation and use;
  11. Researchers benefitting from attractive careers;
  12. Inclusive gender equality is promoted in the European research and innovation system;
  13. A more open and inclusive research and innovation system;
  14. Increased capacity in the EU R&I system to conduct open science and to set it as a modus operandi of modern science;
  15. Increased engagement of citizens with research and innovation;
  16. Increased alignment of strategic research with societal needs, expectations and values;
  17. Identify synergies between second and third level education, and between education and business;
  18. Increased trust in science and R&I outcomes, and greater two-way communication between science and society;
  19. Knowledge and a highly skilled workforce circulate freely;
  20. Improved capacities within the EU R&I system to conduct open science.

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility conditions: described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System

2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

Legal entities established in non-associated third countries may exceptionally participate in this Coordination and support action.

Due to the scope of this topic, legal entities established in non-associated third countries are exceptionally eligible for Union funding.

3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual

  • Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

Specific conditions

7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme

 

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.  

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

 

Latest Updates

Last Changed: July 10, 2024

HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 

EVALUATION results

Published: 06.12.2023

Deadline: 12.03.2024

Available budget: EUR 23.50 million

Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:

  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-01 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 5 7 24
Number of inadmissible proposals 0 0 0
Number of ineligible proposals 0 1 0
Number of above-threshold proposals 2 3 16
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals 4414847,5 2999350 8012579,95
Number of proposals retained for funding 2 1 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 0 1 4
Funding threshold 13,5 14 14,5
Ranking distribution      
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 1 1 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 1 0 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 0 2 12
  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-07 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 8 4 4
Number of inadmissible proposals 0 0 1
Number of ineligible proposals 0 0 1
Number of above-threshold proposals 6 1 2
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals 11612997,5 2500308,75 4184229
Number of proposals retained for funding 1 1 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 2 0 1
Funding threshold 14 14 13
Ranking distribution      
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 1 1 0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 2 0 1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 3 0 1
  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-10 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-11 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-12
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 1 22 18
Number of inadmissible proposals 0 0 1
Number of ineligible proposals 0 0 2
Number of above-threshold proposals 0 12 8
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals   11630578,5 23985487,5
Number of proposals retained for funding 0 3 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 0 4 4
Funding threshold NA 13,5 15
Ranking distribution      
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 0 2 3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 0 4 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 0 6 3

 

Summary of observer report:

The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).

The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.

During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.

No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed. 

The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.

The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.

---------------------

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

 

 

 

 

Last Changed: July 5, 2024

 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 

EVALUATION results

Published: 06.12.2023

Deadline: 12.03.2024

Available budget: EUR 23.50 million

Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:

 

  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 4
Number of inadmissible proposals 1
Number of ineligible proposals 1
Number of above-threshold proposals 2
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals 4184229
Number of proposals retained for funding 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 1
Funding threshold 13
Ranking distribution  
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 1

 

Summary of observer report:

The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).

The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.

During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.

No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed. 

The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.

The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.

---------------------

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

 

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

Support to the development and implementation of policies and practices for reproducibility of scientific results | Grantalist