Global cooperation in not-for-profit open access publishing
HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08
- Programme
- Enhancing the European R&I system
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- December 5, 2023
- Deadline
- March 11, 2024
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €2,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 1
- Keywords
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01Global and transnational governance, international law, human rightsPublic administration
Description
Projects are expected to contribute to the following expected outcomes:
- Enhanced understanding of the different non-for-profit open access publishing solutions, their business models and sustainability;
- Coordination amongst institutional not-for-profit open access publishing services between Europe and other areas in the world at the non-technological level leading to high-quality publishing services and publishing venues at the global scale that are trusted by researchers;
- Enhance the uptake of elements of open science by open access publishing services in Europe and other areas of the world (e.g., open peer review, early sharing of research, post-publication peer review models etc.);
- Fit for purpose training materials and trainings for service providers and scientific journal editors in different disciplines enabling the improvement of the quality of publishing services and of the scientific quality of publishing venues along internationally accepted standards.
These targeted outcomes in turn contribute to medium and long-term impacts:
- Increased equity, diversity and inclusivity of open science practices, and in particular open access publishing on a not-for-profit basis, in the European Union and in the world;
- Structured mechanisms for knowledge transfer between relevant not-for-profit open access publishing services in the European Union and other areas of the world.
A significant increase in open access publishing activities based on not-for-profit business models can be observed in Europe and across the world, which in principle do not charge authors for publishing. They are the result of technological advancements leading to shifting roles of actors involved in scholarly communication. Their offering is presented as an alternative to commercially oriented publishing, or is a continuation of long-term traditions of institutional and mission-oriented publishing in a new digitally enabled context. Such services enable inclusivity for all authors, regardless of affiliation and funding, and support a healthy diversification in the scholarly publishing ecosystem. Research institutions and their libraries are often involved in their operation. In some countries, they operate at the national level and are frequently supported by national funding agencies. In many cases, such initiatives have evolved into robust and reliable services which enjoy the trust of researchers.
The aim of this topic is to support the cooperation between such not-for-profit publishing services and their editors to enable the flow of knowledge between the European Union and one or more other areas of the world, and in more than one discipline. It is expected that most of the activities of the actions will take place online, and that platforms and other online tools will be used to perform as many of the activities as possible.
The call will fund activities that will:
- Gather, share and improve good practices with regard to the non-technological aspects of service provision (editorial scopes, peer-review policies, organisation of editorial and publishing business processes, translation, among others), and with regard to business models;
- Implement practices that will strengthen high-quality publishing services at the global scale so that they are trusted by researchers across countries and disciplines;
- Develop training materials and organise virtual trainings for not-for-profit publishing service providers and their editors to increase knowledge transfer and dissemination of good practices. The materials should become available in open access.
Applicants are expected to cooperate with projects funded under call topic HORIZON-WIDERA-2021-ERA-01-43: Capacity-building for institutional open access publishing across Europe, and call topic HORIZON-INFRA-2022-EOSC-01-02: Improving and coordinating technical infrastructure for institutional open access publishing across Europe, to ensure synergies and complementarity of outcomes.
Duration: The action should be no longer than 36 months.
Destination & Scope
Introduction
Horizon Europe has a new level of ambition – to maximise the impact of the European Union's research and innovation funding for European science, the economy and the wider society. It marks a paradigm change in the design of the European R&I framework programmes (FP) from an activity-driven to an impact-driven programme. Coupled to this ambition is the relaunch of the European Research Area (ERA) as described in the Commission Communication “A new ERA for Research and Innovation” (COM/2020/628 final of 30.09.2020).
The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of R&I cooperation to provide solutions to society’s most demanding needs. With the priority on delivering Europe’s recovery as well as on the green and digital twin transitions, a new level of ambition, linking R&I better with the economy, and with education and training, is needed to match these challenges and put scientific knowledge to work.
The new ERA calls for deepening existing priorities and creating new initiatives by strengthening the mobility of researchers and the free flow of knowledge and technology, to improve access to excellence, boost market uptake and prioritise investment and reform. Working together has been the philosophy of the ERA since its launch; however, the green and digital transitions and the COVID recovery call for more and closer cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and stakeholders. They require the setting of new priorities, launching ambitious joint initiatives and developing common approaches between policies.
To address these requirements, Destination 3 of part 11 of the Horizon Europe work programme will support efforts to reform and enhance the European R&I system. Destination 3 is built around four strands corresponding to the four objectives set out in the ERA Communication:
- Prioritising investments and reforms in research and innovation;
- Improving access to excellence, progressing towards excellence across the whole EU and striving for stronger research and innovation systems;
- Translating R&I results into the economy to meet the digital and green transition objectives, and boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies;
- Deepening the ERA, to further progress the free circulation of knowledge and to ensure an upgraded, efficient and effective R&I system.
The principle of excellence, meaning that the best researchers with the best ideas that offer the best solutions to the societal challenges obtain funding, remains the cornerstone for all investments under the ERA.
Strand 1 recognises the importance of prioritising investments and reforms to accelerate the green and digital transformation and to increase competitiveness as well as the speed and depth of the recovery. It offers support for policy-makers and addresses the need for better analysis and evidence, including simplifying and facilitating the inter-play between national and European R&I systems.
Strand 2 addresses the need to improve access to excellence and to increase the performance of R&I systems, building on dedicated Horizon Europe measures as well as complementarities with smart specialisation strategies under the Cohesion Policy.
Strand 3 focuses on the importance of translating R&I results into the economy. R&I policies should aim to boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies.
Strand 4 addresses the challenge of deepening the ERA and includes Open Science, Higher Education and Researchers, Citizen Science, Science Education, Gender and Ethics. It aims at underpinning a new ERA benefitting from knowledge creation, circulation and use. This empowers higher education institutions and research organisations to embrace a transformative process; where a highly skilled workforce can circulate freely; and where research outputs are shared; where gender equality is assured; where the outcomes of R&I are understood, trusted and increasingly used, by educated informed scientists and citizens to the benefit of society.
Expected impact:
Proposals for topics under this Destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to the following expected impacts, focussing on those that are most relevant to the respective topic:
- Reform and enhance of the European R&I system;
- Prioritisation of investments and reforms, accomplish the recovery and the twin transitions;
- Improved access to excellence;
- High quality scientific production and stronger translation of R&I results into the economy;
- Deepen the ERA;
- Coordinated national and regional R&I programmes by pooling national resources and contributing to the alignment of national research and innovation policies;
- Improved knowledge for policy making about the networking patterns of research support staff and research management;
- Synergies between research & innovation and higher education policies and programmes;
- Modernised higher education sector, adressing higher education, research, and innovation;
- Increased number of interconnected knowledge ecosystems, strong in knowledge creation, circulation and use;
- Researchers benefitting from attractive careers;
- Inclusive gender equality is promoted in the European research and innovation system;
- A more open and inclusive research and innovation system;
- Increased capacity in the EU R&I system to conduct open science and to set it as a modus operandi of modern science;
- Increased engagement of citizens with research and innovation;
- Increased alignment of strategic research with societal needs, expectations and values;
- Identify synergies between second and third level education, and between education and business;
- Increased trust in science and R&I outcomes, and greater two-way communication between science and society;
- Knowledge and a highly skilled workforce circulate freely;
- Improved capacities within the EU R&I system to conduct open science.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
Legal entities established in non-associated third countries may exceptionally participate in this Coordination and support action.
Due to the scope of this topic, legal entities established in non-associated third countries are exceptionally eligible for Union funding.
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
-
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE CSA)
Standard evaluation form — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
MGA
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01
EVALUATION results
Published: 06.12.2023
Deadline: 12.03.2024
Available budget: EUR 23.50 million
Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-01 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 5 | 7 | 24 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 2 | 3 | 16 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 4414847,5 | 2999350 | 8012579,95 |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Funding threshold | 13,5 | 14 | 14,5 |
| Ranking distribution | |||
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-07 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 11612997,5 | 2500308,75 | 4184229 |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Funding threshold | 14 | 14 | 13 |
| Ranking distribution | |||
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-10 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-11 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-12 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 1 | 22 | 18 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 0 | 12 | 8 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 11630578,5 | 23985487,5 | |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Funding threshold | NA | 13,5 | 15 |
| Ranking distribution | |||
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).
The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.
During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.
No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed.
The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.
The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.
---------------------
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01
EVALUATION results
Published: 06.12.2023
Deadline: 12.03.2024
Available budget: EUR 23.50 million
Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 4 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 1 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 2500308,75 |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 0 |
| Funding threshold | 14 |
| Ranking distribution | |
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 0 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 0 |
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).
The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.
During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.
No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed.
The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.
The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.
---------------------
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.