Closed

Strengthening researchers’ skills for better careers – leveraging the European Competence Framework for Researchers

HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04
Programme
Enhancing the European R&I system
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
December 5, 2023
Deadline
March 11, 2024
Deadline Model
single-stage
Budget
€2,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€2,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€2,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
1
Keywords
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01EU research policy /Research policies in the EUEU studies

Description

Expected Outcome:

Projects are expected to contribute to the following outcomes:

  • Researchers at all career stages equipped with a comprehensive set of transversal skills based on the European Competence Framework for Researchers (ResearchComp), to foster more open and inter-sectoral research careers, and a better recognition of the researcher profession;
  • Coordination and exchange of best practices between Higher Education Institutions, research institutions, and other training providers for the improvement of research and transversal skills training;
  • Meeting of labour market demands by strategic partnerships of training providers with labour market actors in the development of training programmes;
  • Contribution to certification of microcredentials;
  • Improved communication of science to the public, to make research careers more appealing to younger generations.
Scope:

Skills are of utmost importance for researchers, they allow them to perform high quality research, and to make the overall European R&I system competitive and challenges-proof. However, it is crucial that researchers are equipped not only with research-specific skills, but also with transversal skills that allow them to be interoperable between academia and the other sectors, including industry and business, and to be capable to establish entrepreneurial activities to turn innovative ideas into business and lead to social, environmental and economic profitability.

Being equipped with a wide spectrum of skills is of high benefit for researchers, who can have access to an enlarged number of opportunities for career development compared to the limited ones available in academia, but also for the labour market, which is in constant need for highly skilled talents such as researchers.

To support inter-sectoral mobility and a broad recognition of the research profession in academia and beyond, and in line with the Skills Agenda, the Commission has developed a set of skills and occupations relevant for researchers which contributed to the update of the European Skills, Competences and Occupations (ESCO) classification. It has also finalised a European Competence Framework for Researchers (ResearchComp)[1], which contains the competences that researchers should have for a successful and interoperable career in academia and beyond, including via entrepreneurship creation and through effective communication of science to the public, to engage an increasing number of young people in research careers. ResearchComp is divided into 7 competence areas, and for each competence it provides four progression levels, each of them with a number of foreseen learning outcomes.

Projects are expected to support research performing organisations in adapting and reinforcing formal and targeted training for researchers based on:

  • The use of ResearchComp, so that training is provided not only on research-specific skills, but also on transversal skills that can foster better research careers in academia and beyond;
  • Strategic interaction with ecosystem actors, in order to have a better understanding of labour market needs, close the gap between demand and supply, and jointly develop training programmes;
  • The promotion and support for networking and the exchange of best practices between Higher Education Institutions and other training providers with regard to the development of formal and targeted training opportunities for researchers that can foster inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary mobility;
  • Without prejudice to the other transversal skills needed by researchers for inter-sectoral and inter-disciplinary mobility, put a specific emphasis on science communication to make researchers capable to correctly and effectively communicate to the public, and to make research careers more attractive for young talents.

Projects are also expected to contribute to the certification and recognition of targeted training opportunities to up-skill and re-skill, provided under the form of micro-credentials.

Activities may include roadmap development, networking, sector-specific training development, seed funding for training providers in academia and beyond (non-exhaustive list of activities that projects may consider).

[1] ResearchComp has been developed in line with the new ERA Communication and the Skills Agenda to strengthen researchers skills for successful careers in academia and beyond. The conceptual model of the framework includes 38 skills, divided in 7 competence areas (Cognitive abilities, Doing research, Managing research, Managing research tools, Making an impact, Working with others, Self-management). Each stakeholder will be able to use the framework according to its own needs. The final version of ResearchComp, to be rolled out by the end of 2022, will also include learning outcomes for each of the relevant skills. More information can be found in the policy brief “Knowledge ecosystems in the new ERA: Using a competence-based approach for career development in academia and beyond” https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8d536780-3025-11ed-975d-01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Destination & Scope

Introduction

Horizon Europe has a new level of ambition – to maximise the impact of the European Union's research and innovation funding for European science, the economy and the wider society. It marks a paradigm change in the design of the European R&I framework programmes (FP) from an activity-driven to an impact-driven programme. Coupled to this ambition is the relaunch of the European Research Area (ERA) as described in the Commission Communication “A new ERA for Research and Innovation” (COM/2020/628 final of 30.09.2020).

The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of R&I cooperation to provide solutions to society’s most demanding needs. With the priority on delivering Europe’s recovery as well as on the green and digital twin transitions, a new level of ambition, linking R&I better with the economy, and with education and training, is needed to match these challenges and put scientific knowledge to work.

The new ERA calls for deepening existing priorities and creating new initiatives by strengthening the mobility of researchers and the free flow of knowledge and technology, to improve access to excellence, boost market uptake and prioritise investment and reform. Working together has been the philosophy of the ERA since its launch; however, the green and digital transitions and the COVID recovery call for more and closer cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and stakeholders. They require the setting of new priorities, launching ambitious joint initiatives and developing common approaches between policies.

To address these requirements, Destination 3 of part 11 of the Horizon Europe work programme will support efforts to reform and enhance the European R&I system. Destination 3 is built around four strands corresponding to the four objectives set out in the ERA Communication:

  1. Prioritising investments and reforms in research and innovation;
  2. Improving access to excellence, progressing towards excellence across the whole EU and striving for stronger research and innovation systems;
  3. Translating R&I results into the economy to meet the digital and green transition objectives, and boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies;
  4. Deepening the ERA, to further progress the free circulation of knowledge and to ensure an upgraded, efficient and effective R&I system.

The principle of excellence, meaning that the best researchers with the best ideas that offer the best solutions to the societal challenges obtain funding, remains the cornerstone for all investments under the ERA.

Strand 1 recognises the importance of prioritising investments and reforms to accelerate the green and digital transformation and to increase competitiveness as well as the speed and depth of the recovery. It offers support for policy-makers and addresses the need for better analysis and evidence, including simplifying and facilitating the inter-play between national and European R&I systems.

Strand 2 addresses the need to improve access to excellence and to increase the performance of R&I systems, building on dedicated Horizon Europe measures as well as complementarities with smart specialisation strategies under the Cohesion Policy.

Strand 3 focuses on the importance of translating R&I results into the economy. R&I policies should aim to boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies.

Strand 4 addresses the challenge of deepening the ERA and includes Open Science, Higher Education and Researchers, Citizen Science, Science Education, Gender and Ethics. It aims at underpinning a new ERA benefitting from knowledge creation, circulation and use. This empowers higher education institutions and research organisations to embrace a transformative process; where a highly skilled workforce can circulate freely; and where research outputs are shared; where gender equality is assured; where the outcomes of R&I are understood, trusted and increasingly used, by educated informed scientists and citizens to the benefit of society.

Expected impact:

Proposals for topics under this Destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to the following expected impacts, focussing on those that are most relevant to the respective topic:

  1. Reform and enhance of the European R&I system;
  2. Prioritisation of investments and reforms, accomplish the recovery and the twin transitions;
  3. Improved access to excellence;
  4. High quality scientific production and stronger translation of R&I results into the economy;
  5. Deepen the ERA;
  6. Coordinated national and regional R&I programmes by pooling national resources and contributing to the alignment of national research and innovation policies;
  7. Improved knowledge for policy making about the networking patterns of research support staff and research management;
  8. Synergies between research & innovation and higher education policies and programmes;
  9. Modernised higher education sector, adressing higher education, research, and innovation;
  10. Increased number of interconnected knowledge ecosystems, strong in knowledge creation, circulation and use;
  11. Researchers benefitting from attractive careers;
  12. Inclusive gender equality is promoted in the European research and innovation system;
  13. A more open and inclusive research and innovation system;
  14. Increased capacity in the EU R&I system to conduct open science and to set it as a modus operandi of modern science;
  15. Increased engagement of citizens with research and innovation;
  16. Increased alignment of strategic research with societal needs, expectations and values;
  17. Identify synergies between second and third level education, and between education and business;
  18. Increased trust in science and R&I outcomes, and greater two-way communication between science and society;
  19. Knowledge and a highly skilled workforce circulate freely;
  20. Improved capacities within the EU R&I system to conduct open science.

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility conditions: described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System

2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual

  • Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

Specific conditions

7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme

 

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.  

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

 

Latest Updates

Last Changed: July 10, 2024

HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 

EVALUATION results

Published: 06.12.2023

Deadline: 12.03.2024

Available budget: EUR 23.50 million

Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:

  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-01 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 5 7 24
Number of inadmissible proposals 0 0 0
Number of ineligible proposals 0 1 0
Number of above-threshold proposals 2 3 16
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals 4414847,5 2999350 8012579,95
Number of proposals retained for funding 2 1 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 0 1 4
Funding threshold 13,5 14 14,5
Ranking distribution      
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 1 1 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 1 0 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 0 2 12
  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-07 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 8 4 4
Number of inadmissible proposals 0 0 1
Number of ineligible proposals 0 0 1
Number of above-threshold proposals 6 1 2
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals 11612997,5 2500308,75 4184229
Number of proposals retained for funding 1 1 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 2 0 1
Funding threshold 14 14 13
Ranking distribution      
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 1 1 0
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 2 0 1
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 3 0 1
  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-10 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-11 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-12
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 1 22 18
Number of inadmissible proposals 0 0 1
Number of ineligible proposals 0 0 2
Number of above-threshold proposals 0 12 8
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals   11630578,5 23985487,5
Number of proposals retained for funding 0 3 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 0 4 4
Funding threshold NA 13,5 15
Ranking distribution      
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 0 2 3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 0 4 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 0 6 3

 

Summary of observer report:

The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).

The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.

During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.

No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed. 

The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.

The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.

---------------------

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

 

 

 

 

Last Changed: July 5, 2024

 HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 

EVALUATION results

Published: 06.12.2023

Deadline: 12.03.2024

Available budget: EUR 23.50 million

Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:

 

  HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) 24
Number of inadmissible proposals 0
Number of ineligible proposals 0
Number of above-threshold proposals 16
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals 8012579,95
Number of proposals retained for funding 1
Number of proposals in the reserve list 4
Funding threshold 14,5
Ranking distribution  
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 2
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 12

Summary of observer report:

The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).

The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.

During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.

No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed. 

The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.

The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.

---------------------

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

 

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.

Strengthening researchers’ skills for better careers – leveraging the European Competence Framework for Researchers | Grantalist