Support for the professionalisation of research management
HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03
- Programme
- Enhancing the European R&I system
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- December 5, 2023
- Deadline
- March 11, 2024
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €2,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 1
- Keywords
- HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01Political systems and institutions, governanceSocial studies of science and technology
Description
This action aims to contribute to improve the European R&I system across the entire ERA by particularly strengthening the capacity for research management in the European Union’s public research performing and funding organisations. Actions are expected to:
- Involve a large number of public research performing and research funding organisations and their research management staff in the training and networking programmes, including by improving accessibility for staff from regions of lower R&I intensity;
- Improve training, skills and career development of research management staff in the participating organisations;
- Contribute to professionalisation, including through certification of training programmes;
- Increase recognition of the research management profession in Member States and the important role of research managers across the ERA.
Strengthen research management capacity and support for a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approach across the entire ERA, including in regions of lower R&I intensity.
Scope:Research management takes various shapes across the ERA (and beyond), and therefore its definition/scope is multi-dimensional, including but not limited to the following roles: research policy advice, evidence-based policy making, foresight and strategy development; research coordination, research development, research project and funding management, financial support; evaluation and assessment support; research and complementary training programme management; data-based research support, such as data stewards and data analysts, exploitation of research data, data protection; specialised research infrastructure operation; scientific integrity and ethics expertise, gender perspective support, legal support; science communication support; knowledge transfer and innovation support, knowledge brokering, incubator coordination and business development. In particular, the aim of this action is to further develop and implement a methodology to identify, train and 'professionalise' individuals who are essential support for the ‘research enterprise’.
There is a strong need for creating sustained pan-European research management training – both in virtual and in non-virtual curricula. This would help to create solid networks of early career and experienced managers that will last throughout their careers, in the various dimensions of research management for which such opportunities do not yet exist. Secondly, research performing and funding entities, local ecosystems, and regions that are strong in knowledge creation and circulation usually rely on a strong community of research managers. An important challenge for the European R&I system in this respect is the uneven distribution of research management communities and expertise across the ERA. Lower R&I intense countries, regions, institutions often lack such communities, or do not have sufficient access to expertise. Thirdly, the need for new skills is constantly evolving, and upskilling of staff requires ready access to training and practice exchange platforms and across the ERA. Fourthly, there seems to be a lack of recognition of research management as a profession, compared to other policy sectors. Similarly, accreditation of training and career development programmes for research managers in the diverse specialisations is lacking.
This call intends to support initiatives towards flexible careers for research managers and career diversification of R&I talents towards research management. Actions should create joint virtual and non-virtual training programmes and curricula for research managers and prepare the road to certification and accreditation. Actions should take measures to realise equal opportunities for access to training programmes for staff from across the entire ERA, including from regions with lower R&I intensity.
The call addresses also support for virtual and non-virtual networks of research managers from public research performing and funding organisations at European level, as well as cross-border European operational networks (existing or new), complementing and coordinating existing national initiatives. Focus could be put on equal access for staff to such networks and exchanges, building capacity in regions and institutions of lower R&I intensity.
Destination & Scope
Introduction
Horizon Europe has a new level of ambition – to maximise the impact of the European Union's research and innovation funding for European science, the economy and the wider society. It marks a paradigm change in the design of the European R&I framework programmes (FP) from an activity-driven to an impact-driven programme. Coupled to this ambition is the relaunch of the European Research Area (ERA) as described in the Commission Communication “A new ERA for Research and Innovation” (COM/2020/628 final of 30.09.2020).
The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated the importance of R&I cooperation to provide solutions to society’s most demanding needs. With the priority on delivering Europe’s recovery as well as on the green and digital twin transitions, a new level of ambition, linking R&I better with the economy, and with education and training, is needed to match these challenges and put scientific knowledge to work.
The new ERA calls for deepening existing priorities and creating new initiatives by strengthening the mobility of researchers and the free flow of knowledge and technology, to improve access to excellence, boost market uptake and prioritise investment and reform. Working together has been the philosophy of the ERA since its launch; however, the green and digital transitions and the COVID recovery call for more and closer cooperation between the Commission, the Member States and stakeholders. They require the setting of new priorities, launching ambitious joint initiatives and developing common approaches between policies.
To address these requirements, Destination 3 of part 11 of the Horizon Europe work programme will support efforts to reform and enhance the European R&I system. Destination 3 is built around four strands corresponding to the four objectives set out in the ERA Communication:
- Prioritising investments and reforms in research and innovation;
- Improving access to excellence, progressing towards excellence across the whole EU and striving for stronger research and innovation systems;
- Translating R&I results into the economy to meet the digital and green transition objectives, and boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies;
- Deepening the ERA, to further progress the free circulation of knowledge and to ensure an upgraded, efficient and effective R&I system.
The principle of excellence, meaning that the best researchers with the best ideas that offer the best solutions to the societal challenges obtain funding, remains the cornerstone for all investments under the ERA.
Strand 1 recognises the importance of prioritising investments and reforms to accelerate the green and digital transformation and to increase competitiveness as well as the speed and depth of the recovery. It offers support for policy-makers and addresses the need for better analysis and evidence, including simplifying and facilitating the inter-play between national and European R&I systems.
Strand 2 addresses the need to improve access to excellence and to increase the performance of R&I systems, building on dedicated Horizon Europe measures as well as complementarities with smart specialisation strategies under the Cohesion Policy.
Strand 3 focuses on the importance of translating R&I results into the economy. R&I policies should aim to boost the resilience and competitiveness of our economies and societies.
Strand 4 addresses the challenge of deepening the ERA and includes Open Science, Higher Education and Researchers, Citizen Science, Science Education, Gender and Ethics. It aims at underpinning a new ERA benefitting from knowledge creation, circulation and use. This empowers higher education institutions and research organisations to embrace a transformative process; where a highly skilled workforce can circulate freely; and where research outputs are shared; where gender equality is assured; where the outcomes of R&I are understood, trusted and increasingly used, by educated informed scientists and citizens to the benefit of society.
Expected impact:
Proposals for topics under this Destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to the following expected impacts, focussing on those that are most relevant to the respective topic:
- Reform and enhance of the European R&I system;
- Prioritisation of investments and reforms, accomplish the recovery and the twin transitions;
- Improved access to excellence;
- High quality scientific production and stronger translation of R&I results into the economy;
- Deepen the ERA;
- Coordinated national and regional R&I programmes by pooling national resources and contributing to the alignment of national research and innovation policies;
- Improved knowledge for policy making about the networking patterns of research support staff and research management;
- Synergies between research & innovation and higher education policies and programmes;
- Modernised higher education sector, adressing higher education, research, and innovation;
- Increased number of interconnected knowledge ecosystems, strong in knowledge creation, circulation and use;
- Researchers benefitting from attractive careers;
- Inclusive gender equality is promoted in the European research and innovation system;
- A more open and inclusive research and innovation system;
- Increased capacity in the EU R&I system to conduct open science and to set it as a modus operandi of modern science;
- Increased engagement of citizens with research and innovation;
- Increased alignment of strategic research with societal needs, expectations and values;
- Identify synergies between second and third level education, and between education and business;
- Increased trust in science and R&I outcomes, and greater two-way communication between science and society;
- Knowledge and a highly skilled workforce circulate freely;
- Improved capacities within the EU R&I system to conduct open science.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
-
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE CSA)
Standard evaluation form — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
MGA
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01
EVALUATION results
Published: 06.12.2023
Deadline: 12.03.2024
Available budget: EUR 23.50 million
Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-01 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-04 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 5 | 7 | 24 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 2 | 3 | 16 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 4414847,5 | 2999350 | 8012579,95 |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Funding threshold | 13,5 | 14 | 14,5 |
| Ranking distribution | |||
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-07 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-08 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-09 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 11612997,5 | 2500308,75 | 4184229 |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Funding threshold | 14 | 14 | 13 |
| Ranking distribution | |||
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-10 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-11 | HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-12 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 1 | 22 | 18 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 0 | 12 | 8 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 11630578,5 | 23985487,5 | |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Funding threshold | NA | 13,5 | 15 |
| Ranking distribution | |||
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 0 | 6 | 3 |
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).
The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.
During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.
No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed.
The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.
The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.
---------------------
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01
EVALUATION results
Published: 06.12.2023
Deadline: 12.03.2024
Available budget: EUR 23.50 million
Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:
| HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01-03 | |
| Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 7 |
| Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 |
| Number of ineligible proposals | 1 |
| Number of above-threshold proposals | 3 |
| Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 2999350 |
| Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 |
| Number of proposals in the reserve list | 1 |
| Funding threshold | 14 |
| Ranking distribution | |
| Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 0 |
| Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 2 |
Summary of observer report:
The evaluation of the HORIZON-WIDERA-2024-ERA-01 Call covered nine Topics and 93 submitted proposals. A total of 39 experts (evaluators), 12 dedicated rapporteurs and one independent observer were involved in the process, which was coordinated and managed by a very professional team of EC staff members (from REA).
The evaluation process was a complex task that extended throughout several weeks and required a strong coordination between all participants. This complexity led, however, to high quality results, i.e., funding decisions taken against clearly established criteria after comprehensive and well-organised discussions.
During the individual remote and central phases, experts behaved professionally, and discussions were fair and balanced. In general, experts did not allow consensus to be reached without due process and robust exchange of views. All proposals were assessed and treated in a similar way.
No specific issues were raised as regards to impartiality of the participants, and confidentiality aspects were clearly managed.
The transparency of the procedures was evident throughout the process, and the throughput time was sufficient to adequately undertake the evaluation process.
The evaluation process fulfilled the high quality standards of the Horizon Europe evaluation procedures.
---------------------
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.