Soil Salinity In Europe: Drivers, Indicators, Current Levels And Temporal Changes
HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11
- Programme
- Supporting the implementation of the Soil Deal for Europe Mission
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- May 6, 2025
- Deadline
- September 30, 2025
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €5,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 1
- Keywords
- HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11HORIZON-MISS-2025-05AgricultureEnvironmentSoil conservationSoil monitoringSoil science
Description
Expected Outcome:
Activities under this topic will help progress towards the objectives and targets of the Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’, in particular towards its target 4.6 ‘Halt and reduce secondary salinization’. Activities will also contribute to the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 on climate action and SDG 15 on Life on Land.
The successful projects are expected to contribute to all of the following outcomes:
- Policy makers and relevant stakeholders have access to improved indicators and to knowledge and quantitative data on the current levels of soil salinity in Europe and its impact on ecosystem services provided by soils (such as providing food, clean water and a habitat for biodiversity).
- Policy makers and relevant stakeholder have an enhanced understanding of the primary drivers and mechanisms of soil salinization across different pedo-climatic regions in Europe.
- Policy makers and relevant stakeholder have improved access to knowledge and quantitative data on temporal shifts in soil salinity levels over the past decades and to projections for future trends across Europe under varying scenarios.
- Accelerated uptake in land use planning practices of innovative and reproducible sustainable land management strategies to prevent, minimise and remediate soil salinization in Europe.
Scope:
Excessive soil salinity is a significant environmental issue in Europe, negatively impacting soil fertility, plant growth, soil biodiversity, the soil microbiome, and overall ecosystem functioning. Climate change, coupled with increased evaporation and irrigation, is likely to exacerbate salinization, potentially leading to uncertain consequences for carbon storage and water cycling because of soil degradation induced by salinity. Salinity is one of the descriptors in the proposal for a Directive on Soil Monitoring and Resilience and is recognized as one of the major drivers of soil degradation. The extent of soil salinization in Europe remains uncertain. Currently, there is no quantitative model capable of predicting future soil salinization in Europe under changing climate conditions at the resolution necessary for local management action and policy development.
Proposed activities should:
- Investigate the relationship between soil salinity, vegetation, soil biodiversity and drought (climate conditions) across all relevant land use types, and in the specific case of agricultural lands also including the relationship between crop production, plant adaptation mechanisms and crop resilience.
- Develop a harmonised assessment of soil salinity in Europe. This should include integration of high-resolution remote sensing data (earth observation techniques) with quantification techniques to enhance spatial resolution and accuracy in soil salinity monitoring, harmonisation of laboratorial procedures and monitoring systems, and testing the feasibility of statistical methods to combine soil salinity data collected by different protocols.
- Develop a quantitative model to predict future soil salinization in Europe under changing climate conditions.
- Assess the impact of saltwater intrusion on soil salinity and soil health in coastal regions to gauge vulnerability within climate change and rising sea levels.
- Identify hotspots of soil salinization and areas at risk across Europe to inform policy formulation, action planning, and sustainable land management strategies.
- Formulate innovative land management strategies that address both mitigation and adaptation to soil salinization, in co-creation with relevant stakeholders.
Proposals should include dedicated tasks and appropriate resources for coordination measures and joint activities with other relevant projects and initiatives funded under the Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’, including engagement with the relevant cluster activities.
Proposals should demonstrate a route towards open access, longevity, sustainability and interoperability of knowledge and outputs through close collaboration with the European Union Soil Observatory (EUSO) and SoilWise. Particular efforts should be made to ensure that the data produced in the context of this topic is FAIR[1]. Proposals are encouraged to consider, where relevant, the data, expertise and services offered by European research infrastructures[2].
[1] Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable
[2] The catalogue of European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) research infrastructures portfolio can be browsed from ESFRI website https://ri-portfolio.esfri.eu/.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025). [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 12. Missions
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 14. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Frequently Asked Questions About Soil Salinity In Europe: Drivers, Indicators, Current Levels And Temporal Changes
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
Published: 06/05/2025
Deadline: 30/09/2025
Available budget: EUR 73.00 million
Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:
Topic code | Type of action | Budget (EUR million) |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01 | RIA | 12.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-02 | RIA | 11.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-04 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-05 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-06 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-07 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-08 | CSA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09 | CSA | 5.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-10 | CSA | 3.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11 | RIA | 6.00 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-02 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-04 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-05 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-06 | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 12 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR million) | 47.9 | 16.4 | 29.9 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 42.8 |
Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Funding threshold | 14.5 | 13 | 12.5 | 11.5 | 14 | 14.5 |
Ranking distribution | ||||||
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-07 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-08 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-10 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11 | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR million) | 18.0 | 6.0 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 18.0 |
Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Funding threshold | 13 | 12.5 | 13.5 | 12.5 | 13 |
Ranking distribution | |||||
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Summary of observers’ report:
This report by the Independent Observers documents the fulfilment of all quality standards and an assessment of the appropriateness of the evaluation procedures. The principles of transparency, impartiality, and fairness guided the evaluation process which was managed by clearly defined evaluation procedures which were tightly monitored by external observers. The selected experts demonstrated competences and complementarity. The Consensus discussions focused exclusively on the published assessment criteria. Exclusion of any conflicts of interests at all steps of the evaluation was monitored by multiple actors and at various stages of the evaluation. Before the start of the individual evaluations, evaluators were trained and familiarised with the evaluation contents and standards while enabling multidisciplinary evaluation perspectives. After individual evaluation by three to four independent external experts, their reports were integrated by external rapporteurs. In dedicated consensus discussions, each proposal was discussed with the help of the Agency’s moderators and frequently monitored by Independent Observers. To enable homogeneity in the application of the evaluation principles, all Consensus Reports were independently reviewed by quality checkers, providing detailed feedback on any potential deviation from the quality standards and any risks of inconsistencies. For topics involving more than one panel, dedicated calibration meetings with quality checkers took place to implement the quality standards homogeneously and to ensure consistency. Based on their observations, analysis of written documentation, feedback from experts, analysis of research on grant peer review and a comparative analysis of national and international grant peer review procedures, the observers estimate that this evaluation process was of comparably excellent quality, constituting the state of the art in terms of ensuring a thorough, fair and transparent evaluation.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Flash information on proposal numbers
Call HORIZON-MISS-2025-05 has closed on 30/09/2025.
76 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01: 12 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-02: 8 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03: 20 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-04: 1 proposal
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-05: 3 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-06: 11 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-07: 5 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-08: 4 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09: 5 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-10: 4 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11: 3 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in January 2026.