Citizen Engagement For Sustainable Land Management Through Local And Regional Authorities
HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09
- Programme
- Supporting the implementation of the Soil Deal for Europe Mission
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- May 6, 2025
- Deadline
- September 30, 2025
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €5,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 1
- Keywords
- HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09HORIZON-MISS-2025-05AgricultureDemocratic engagement and civic participationSocial sciences, interdisciplinarySoil managementSoil scienceValorisation and capacity building
Description
Expected Outcome:
Activities under this topic contribute to the implementation of the Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’, in particular to its specific objective 8 “improve soil literacy in society”, and to strengthening the capacities of local and regional authorities in line with the proposal for a Directive on Soil Monitoring and Resilience.
Activities should also contribute to meeting the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 15 on Life on land and SDG 11 on Sustainable Cities and Communities.
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Substantially increased awareness and understanding among citizens and local and regional policy makers of the value of soils, soil health challenges and drivers (both bio-physical and socio-economic dimensions) across Europe.
- An increased number of regions and municipalities across Europe have adopted Territorial Management Agreements[1] co-designed with citizens and stakeholders to foster sustainable land management practices.
- Local and regional authorities[2] have improved access to capacity building activities on how to implement solutions for the protection and restoration of soil health and enhance citizen engagement in sustainable land management.
Scope:
Citizen engagement is one of the building blocks of the Mission Soil but despite the advances in recognising the importance of soil health and the momentum for soil in the political agenda, active participation in soil protection and restoration and understanding of soil health importance often remain limited among non-experts. Activities under this topic should involve local and regional authorities in the protection and restoration of soil health and establish participatory processes that take into account citizens’ priorities. Local and regional participatory processes should result in Territorial Management Agreements[3] aimed at the protection and restoration of soil health for the provision of ecosystem services, including biodiversity, and climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Proposed activities should:
- Provide training and technical support to public authorities to design and run inclusive and effective participatory processes at local and regional level that lead to the adoption of Territorial Management Agreements to foster sustainable land management and contribute to climate change adaptation and mitigation.
- Launch the implementation of at least 40 Territorial Management Agreements, one per local or regional authority involved, and provide guidelines and resources to sustain and monitor their implementation in the long term.
- Organise capacity-building activities for representatives of local and regional authorities including training, peer-to-peer learning and knowledge-sharing activities to promote the adoption of solutions for the restoration of soil health at their level of governance.
Proposals should actively involve local and regional authorities as beneficiaries or through the use of financial support to third parties. If making use of financial support to third parties, the support should be provided in the form of grants following an open call of European dimension for local or regional authorities to run participatory processes to co-design with citizens Territorial Management Agreements and launch their implementation. The maximum amount to be granted to each third party is EUR 60 000.
The local and regional authorities involved in the project are expected to engage citizens and stakeholders at the local and regional level for the protection and restoration of soil health.
Proposals should bring together expertise on environmental and soil sciences, as well as transdisciplinary expertise on spatial planning and social sciences and humanities (SSH), including gender studies, to design and organise training and successful capacity building activities for local and regional authorities and support them in the implementation of effective participatory processes. The engagement of citizen and stakeholders in the design of Territorial Management Agreements should be representative of the local community and stakeholders and be inclusive. Thus, proposals must incorporate gender perspectives and give attention to the inclusion of people in vulnerable situations.
Proposals should include dedicated tasks and appropriate resources for coordination measures and joint activities with other relevant projects and initiatives funded under the Mission “A Soil Deal for Europe”, including engagement with the relevant cluster activities.
Proposals should demonstrate a route towards open access, longevity, sustainability and interoperability of knowledge and outputs through close collaboration with the European Union Soil Observatory (EUSO) and SoilWise.
[1] Territorial Management Agreements is the terminology used by the Horizon Europe project Healthy Municipal Soils (HuMuS). For consistency, proposals should use the same terminology.
[2] In the context of this topic, regional authorities refer to legal entities responsible for managing regions, geographical areas at sub-national level, defined as NUTS 2 and 3, corresponding to actual administrative units with their own representation/government. For more information about NUTS (Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics), see https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts
[3] Territorial Management Agreements are co-designed pacts between a public authority, relevant stakeholders and citizens aimed at the protection and restoration of soil health. The Agreement should define roles, responsibilities and actions of the parties involved, as well as monitoring and evaluation mechanisms to keep track of the progress made towards the desired results.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Beneficiaries may provide financial support to third parties. The support to third parties can only be provided in the form of grants. The maximum amount to be granted to each third party is EUR 60 000.
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE CSA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 12. Missions
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 14. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Frequently Asked Questions About Citizen Engagement For Sustainable Land Management Through Local And Regional Authorities
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
Published: 06/05/2025
Deadline: 30/09/2025
Available budget: EUR 73.00 million
Budget per topic with separate ‘call-budget-split’:
Topic code | Type of action | Budget (EUR million) |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01 | RIA | 12.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-02 | RIA | 11.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-04 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-05 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-06 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-07 | RIA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-08 | CSA | 6.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09 | CSA | 5.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-10 | CSA | 3.00 |
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11 | RIA | 6.00 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-02 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-04 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-05 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-06 | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 12 | 8 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 11 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR million) | 47.9 | 16.4 | 29.9 | 6.0 | 12.0 | 42.8 |
Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Funding threshold | 14.5 | 13 | 12.5 | 11.5 | 14 | 14.5 |
Ranking distribution | ||||||
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-07 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-08 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-10 | HE-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11 | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals (EUR million) | 18.0 | 6.0 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 18.0 |
Number of proposals retained for funding | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Funding threshold | 13 | 12.5 | 13.5 | 12.5 | 13 |
Ranking distribution | |||||
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Summary of observers’ report:
This report by the Independent Observers documents the fulfilment of all quality standards and an assessment of the appropriateness of the evaluation procedures. The principles of transparency, impartiality, and fairness guided the evaluation process which was managed by clearly defined evaluation procedures which were tightly monitored by external observers. The selected experts demonstrated competences and complementarity. The Consensus discussions focused exclusively on the published assessment criteria. Exclusion of any conflicts of interests at all steps of the evaluation was monitored by multiple actors and at various stages of the evaluation. Before the start of the individual evaluations, evaluators were trained and familiarised with the evaluation contents and standards while enabling multidisciplinary evaluation perspectives. After individual evaluation by three to four independent external experts, their reports were integrated by external rapporteurs. In dedicated consensus discussions, each proposal was discussed with the help of the Agency’s moderators and frequently monitored by Independent Observers. To enable homogeneity in the application of the evaluation principles, all Consensus Reports were independently reviewed by quality checkers, providing detailed feedback on any potential deviation from the quality standards and any risks of inconsistencies. For topics involving more than one panel, dedicated calibration meetings with quality checkers took place to implement the quality standards homogeneously and to ensure consistency. Based on their observations, analysis of written documentation, feedback from experts, analysis of research on grant peer review and a comparative analysis of national and international grant peer review procedures, the observers estimate that this evaluation process was of comparably excellent quality, constituting the state of the art in terms of ensuring a thorough, fair and transparent evaluation.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Flash information on proposal numbers
Call HORIZON-MISS-2025-05 has closed on 30/09/2025.
76 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-01: 12 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-02: 8 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-03: 20 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-04: 1 proposal
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-05: 3 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-06: 11 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-07: 5 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-08: 4 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-09: 5 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-10: 4 proposals
HORIZON-MISS-2025-05-SOIL-11: 3 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in January 2026.