Community-led actions to restore our ocean, seas and waters
HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01
- Programme
- Support to communities of actors for the Mission Restore our ocean and waters by 2030
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- April 23, 2024
- Deadline
- October 1, 2024
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €50,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €12,500,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €12,500,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 4
- Keywords
- HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02Agriculture, Rural Development, FisheriesAquacultureAquaculture policiesAquaculture, fisheriesBiodiversity conservationBlue Skills AgendaBlue biotechnologyCatchment scale planningCatchment scale water managementCitizen cooperation and reportingClimate change adaptationCoastalCoastal AdaptationCoastal And Environmental ProtectionCoastal And Maritime TourismCoastal EngineeringCoastal ErosionCoastal ecosystemsCoastal tourismCross-Cutting Marine/Maritime AreasEcosystem managementEcosystem services provided by catchment areasEffects of climate change on aquacultureEffects of climate change on fisheriesEnvironment, Pollution & ClimateEnvironment, fisheries and aquaculture interactionsEnvironment, resources and sustainabilityEnvironmental ConservationEnvironmental and Green TechnologiesEnvironmental and marine biologyEnvironmental impacts of aquacultureEnvironmental impacts of fisheriesEnvironmental protectionEnvironmental sciencesEnvironmental sciences (social aspects)European Maritime and Fisheries FundFeasibility analysisFish SpeciesFisheriesFisheries policiesFisheries scienceFood and nutritionFreshwater ecologyGlobal WarmingGovernance in aquacultureGovernance in fisheriesGreen and blue infrastructureGreenhouse gasesHabitat and species restoration and rehabilitationHydrologyHydrology (Water science)Hydrosphere - FreshwaterHydrosphere - Marine and OceanImpacts of environment on aquacultureIntegrated Maritime PolicyIntegrated Multi-Trophic AquacultureIntegrated coastal zone managementIntegrated management of waterInternational Ocean GovernanceInvasive Alien Marine SpeciesIslandsKnowledge and Technology transferLife cycles of farmed aquatic speciesMangrove restorationMarine EcologyMarine EcosystemsMarine Ecosystems RestorationMarine EnvironmentMarine Environmental PoliciesMarine Knowledge and ResearchMarine LitterMarine Protected Areas/MpasMarine ReservesMarine Social SciencesMarine and Maritime Data Processing And AnalysisMarine and Ocean ManagementMarine biodiversity conservationMarine biofuelsMarine biorefineriesMarine ecosystem managementMarine energyMarine, Coastal And Ocean PollutionMaritime Cooperation at Sea Basin levelMaritime IndustryMaritime PolicyMaritime Regional CooperationMaritime SkillsMaritime transportMicroalgaeNatureNature-based solutionsOceanOcean AcidificationOcean Observation and MonitoringOcean and Climate ChangeOcean observing systems and operational forecastingOffshore Wind EnergyOffshore renewable energyPlastics, Marine Litter and Circular EconomyPollution (water, soil), waste disposal and treatmentPort/HarbourPrivate investmentPublic participationRelated to regional developmentRiver basin management Sea-Basin StrategiesSeafood biotechnologySeafood economySeaweed / AlgaeSkills for the Blue EconomySocial innovationSustainable innovationTechnology commercialisationValorisation and capacity buildingWater Framework DirectiveWater cycleWater managementWater policyWater resourcesWater technologyWater-climate interactionsWaterborne transport
Description
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- Demonstration of measurable, verifiable and ambitious progress towards reaching one or several interlinked objectives and targets of the Mission “Restore our Ocean and Waters by 2030”, as set out in the Mission Implementation Plan[1] through implementation of effective and well-managed community-led pilot actions and other types of support to Mission communities of actors.
- A concrete contribution to support Member States/Associated countries, their national, regional and/or local authorities, as well as all concerned stakeholders, to implement EU legislation related to marine and freshwater ecosystems[2] and reach the biodiversity, pollution and climate targets of the European Green Deal.
- Mobilised and engaged Mission communities of actors (regions, ports, cities, islands, etc.) through effective support designed to accelerate the progress to achieve the Mission objectives and targets;
- Leveraging of resources and investments from communities of actors to restore our ocean, seas and waters.
- Increased readiness at local level to deploy at scale innovative solutions to restore the ocean, seas and waters.
As stated in the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan, the deployment and upscaling phase (phase 2 of the Mission starting in 2026) aims to “enable broad participation in the Mission across the EU” with “a strong citizen, stakeholder and community governance element”. In the second phase of the Mission implementation, the solutions developed and piloted in the first phase (development and piloting phase) to deliver on the Mission and Green Deal objectives will be further deployed, replicated, and scaled up. Therefore, in the last years of phase 1, a transition to the deployment and upscaling phase needs to be well prepared.
Reaching the ambitious Mission objectives and targets is dependent on mobilising a broad set of actors to take meaningful action to restore our ocean, seas and waters. Practical, easily accessible support is needed for established or emerging communities of actors to facilitate the deployment at scale of innovative actions, measures and initiatives contributing to the EU Mission’s objectives, and the transformations required at national, regional, and local level.
Each proposed action under this topic should address one of the four basins covered by the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030'[3] and should foresee all of the following types of support to Mission communities of actors of the respective basin: financial support to third parties (also referred to as cascading grants) to community-led pilot actions; cascading grants for transition agendas; and technical assistance, to be provided by the consortium.
Cascading grants to community-led pilot actions
Each proposal under this topic should foresee awarding at least 5 cascading grants of EUR 200 000 - EUR 2 million[4] per grant to community-led pilot actions that are implementing innovative solutions towards achieving one or several interlinked Mission objectives in the respective basin addressed by the proposal. The Commission estimates that the total budget for the cascading call to support community-led actions could be in the order of EUR 7 million. These third-party community-led actions may be implemented by a consortium of several participants. The size of the consortium and the budget requested should reflect the specific local needs addressed by the third-party action.
The proposals must ensure that the selection process of the third parties to which financial support would be granted is based on principles of transparency, objectivity and fairness, in accordance with Annex B of the general annexes to this work programme.
The proposals are expected to provide a detailed plan for the cascading grant call for the community-led pilot actions, in particular planning the launch of the call no later than the end of month 3 of the project. The proposals should describe appropriate means to promote the cascading grant call at lighthouse, national and regional levels that would allow them to reach as many of the potential applicants as possible.
The third-party actions supported through the cascading call should demonstrate measurable, verifiable, and ambitious progress towards reaching at least one or, whenever possible and applicable, several interlinked objectives and targets set out in the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan. The chosen focus of the third-party actions should depend on which objective(s) are most urgent for the communities dealing with specific conditions and realities in a particular area. However, addressing several objectives, in the case that this is feasible, may provide an added value and should thus be seen as advantage for the applications in the cascading calls.
The third-party actions should focus on implementing innovative solutions that go beyond the state of the art and that combine, as appropriate, technological, nature-based, social, cultural, regulatory, and financial innovation, and new governance models. The actions should foster a participatory approach that empowers local stakeholders, builds on their local know-how and application of sustainable practices, and encourages their long-term commitment to the protection, restoration and de-pollution of our ocean, seas and waters and to making the sustainable blue economy carbon-neutral and circular. With the help from the project consortia selected under this topic, the community-led third-party actions should promote the deployment and upscaling of innovative solutions to restore the ocean and waters, including through the preparation of deployment plans.
The community-led third-party actions should be encouraged to cooperate with scientific institutions to stimulate transdisciplinary innovation activities, which are based on best available science practices. Transdisciplinary activities denote cooperation of diverse societal stakeholder groups (administration, civil society, business & industry, finance, etc.), not only across academic disciplines (‘interdisciplinary’).
These community-led actions should also consider an effective contribution of SSH (Social Sciences and Humanities) disciplines as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related innovation activities. Social innovation should also be considered in order to match innovative ideas with social needs.
The proposals should encourage the third-party actions to build on research and innovation developed by projects financed under the current and/or previous EU framework programmes and other relevant EU and national programmes, linking also to the Mission Implementation Platform[5], and where applicable, make use of Copernicus/Galileo/EGNOS and Emodnet.
Attracting additional financing from Structural Funds or any national, regional, local programmes or private funding at any stage of the community-led pilot actions is strongly encouraged.
The types of Mission communities relevant to the cascading grants may include at least the following:
- ports (including inland ports);
- islands;
- fishing communities, aquaculture producers and other representatives of blue economy;
- operators of various vessels;
- Local Action Groups described by the Community-Led Local Development strategies[6]
- waterfront cities or regions / communities (avoiding overlaps with Cities’ Mission);
- conservation communities;
- representatives of the tourism sector;
- maritime infrastructure operators (incl. offshore platforms and their operators).
Various types of actors in the communities listed above could apply for the support. These could include for example:
- regional and local authorities;
- NGOs, foundations, professional associations, and other entities engaged in local development and nature conservation activities;
- educational establishments;
- locally based companies (provided this is not in conflict with the State Aid rules);
- research performing organisations, etc.
Cascading grants for transition agendas
Each proposed action should also foresee awarding at least 20 cascading grants for transition agendas of up to EUR 100 000 each, addressing the types of Mission communities described above. The proposed actions should ensure that the selection process of the third parties to which financial support for transition agendas would be granted is based on principles of transparency, objectivity, and fairness, in accordance with Annex B of the general annexes to this work programme.
A transition agenda for this call is understood as a strategic roadmap towards reaching all objectives and targets of the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030' in the applicant communities, with a particular focus on the objectives that are most relevant to the specific community. The roadmaps could cover processes needed to ensure the protection and restoration of marine/coastal/inland waters, biodiversity and ecosystems, the reduction/elimination of pollution and the achievement of decarbonisation and circularity targets, as well as include a plan for a defined number of years concerning the objectives set, covering, for example, expected outcomes, results, impact, ways to achieve them and ways to bring in financing to support the achievement of these objectives.
The transition agenda should indicate how specific results and ideally also their impacts are expected to materialise in order to ensure the actual achievements of the objectives. These agendas would serve as a basis for further planning of follow-up activities by the actors involved, particularly actions to meet the Mission Ocean and Waters objectives/targets, to be subsequently implemented with the financial support of various funds (e.g., EU structural funds/national/regional funds).
All entities establishing transition agendas should commit to report to the project that had issued the third-party financing within 6 months after finalisation of the agendas on the progress of implementing its results in practice.
Technical assistance to Mission Communities of actors
The proposals should also foresee technical assistance to Mission Communities of actors in the basin addressed by the respective action. Such assistance should address the needs of the Mission communities of actors in the particular basin and may include support and advice needed for the preparation of business plans, feasibility studies, impact assessments, and needs assessment, as well as long-term sustainability planning to help the communities of actors develop sustainable financing strategies to ensure longevity of the efforts to achieve healthy oceans, seas and waters; capacity building to empower communities of actors with the knowledge and skills needed to undertake effective pollution prevention and elimination, conservation and restoration initiatives, as well as making the sustainable blue economy carbon-neutral and circular; and other Mission-related actions that would require direct counselling, written guidance, online materials, webinars, in-depths sessions, deep dives, peer-to-peer support, twinning etc.).
It is essential to tailor the support provided to the specific needs and context of each community of actors, including through the use of local languages, as well as fostering a participatory approach that empowers local stakeholders and encourages their long-term commitment to the protection and restoration of our ocean, seas and waters.
The proposals under this topic should also work on clustering of and support to the third-party community-led actions. The proposals should help create a network of these community-led actions to enhance communication, collaboration and sharing of knowledge and best practices to maximise their combined impact, and create links to the networks similarly created by the other three projects selected under this topic in other Mission lighthouse areas.
Furthermore, the proposals should assist each community-led action in using its experiences and solutions to establish new networks and collaborations in their respective areas. The proposals should provide guidance and support to the third-party actions in forming partnerships with local communities, NGOs, government agencies, or relevant stakeholders to expand the impact of the actions and create a collaborative ecosystem for knowledge sharing, resource optimisation, and wider adoption of successful solutions.
The proposals should provide help and guidance to the selected community-led actions regarding access to additional funding. The proposals should also identify, evaluate, and showcase feasible and scalable solutions demonstrated by the community-led actions, and provide guidance on deployment of these solutions.
Furthermore, the proposals should set aside funds for clustering and collaboration among four projects selected under this topic, including for a joint monitoring and evaluation framework to track the progress of each third-party community-led action project and assess their collective impact.
In order to ensure complementarities and avoid overlaps concerning the provision of all three types of support described above, the proposals should work closely with other Horizon Europe projects, particularly Prep4Blue, the relevant Mission lighthouse CSA projects (EcoDaLLi[7], BlueMissionAA[8], BlueMissionMed[9], BlueMissionBANOS[10]), the project selected under HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-02, the public procurement prepared under Other Actions of WP 2022 “Studies to support communities of actors to achieve the EU Mission: Restore our Ocean and Waters objectives”, and the Mission Implementation Platform (MIP), notably with the work MIP does on deployment and upscaling of solutions. The proposals may also collaborate with and build on the experience of relevant existing networks, partnerships and initiatives[11], as well as take into account relevant strategic research and innovation agendas and regional strategies.
The projects resulting from this call should be implemented in close collaboration with the relevant EC service(s) and the Mission Ocean and Waters Secretariat[12] to ensure a coherent and timely implementation of the Mission.
Proposals should be flexible enough to accommodate for some adjustments that may be requested by the Commission before the grant agreement signature to ensure complementarity of activities between the lighthouse CSA projects, Prep4Blue, the Mission Implementation Platform, and the project selected under topic HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-02.
[1] See pages 12-13 of the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-09/ocean_and_waters_implementation_plan_for_publication.pdf
[2] The Birds, Habitats, Marine Strategy Framework and Water Framework Directives
[3] The four basins covered by the Mission ’Restore our ocean and waters by 2030’: 1. Danube river basin, 2. Atlantic and Arctic sea basin, 3. Mediterranean Sea basin, 4. Baltic and North Sea basin
[4] This range of funding refers to the amount awarded as a cascading grant to a community-led action (third-party action) which we envision to be implemented by a consortium of several participants (third parties). Please note that this is different from the specific condition concerning Legal and financial set-up of the Grant Agreements, where the stipulated maximum amount applies to each individual third party (please see the relevant footnote under the specific conditions).
[5] Mission Ocean and Waters service portal | Research and Innovation (europa.eu)
[9] https://bluemissionmed.eu/
[10] https://bluemissionbanos.eu/
[11] These could include networks and initiatives such as BIOEAST (https://bioeast.eu/), AAORIA (https://allatlanticocean.org/), BlueMed Initiative (http://www.bluemed-initiative.eu/ ), etc
[12] Mission secretariat consisting of European Commission staff, is located within the European Commission services and is managed by the Mission Manager, for details on Mission governance see Commission Decision C(2021) 4472 final of 24.06.2021.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions:
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other eligibility conditions:
In addition to the standard eligibility conditions, the consortium must include beneficiaries from at least two regions[[ Represented by the relevant public authorities.]] or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area (also referred to as basin) covered by the proposal.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion:
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5. Evaluation and award:
Evaluation carried out by EU staff
To ensure a balanced portfolio covering all four basins covered by the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030' (1. Danube river basin, 2. Atlantic and Arctic sea basin, 3. Mediterranean Sea basin, 4. Baltic and North Sea basin), grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but also to at least one proposal that is the highest ranked within each basin, provided that the applications attain all necessary thresholds.
- Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
- Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
Evaluation committee partially composed of EU representatives
To ensure a balanced portfolio covering all four basins covered by the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030' (1. Danube river basin, 2. Atlantic and Arctic sea basin, 3. Mediterranean Sea basin, 4. Baltic and North Sea basin), grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but also to at least one proposal that is the highest ranked within each basin, provided that the applications attain all necessary thresholds.
- Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
Beneficiaries may provide financial support to third parties. The support to third parties can only be provided in the form of grants. The financial support to third parties may only be awarded to Mission community[[ For this call, a Mission community refers to a group of individuals, public or private sector entities or other actors who are actively involved in activities relevant for the achievement of Mission objectives. Examples of such communities include waterfront cities or regions, islands, ports, fishing communities, etc. and other groups that are engaged in addressing Mission objectives. We consider that such communities can consist of various types of actors specific to each particular type of community. Some examples of such actors include, among others, public authorities, NGOs, associations, companies, research organisations, etc.]] actors, located in Member States and Associated Countries, for:
- community-led[[ For this call, community-led actions refer to initiatives, projects, or activities that are defined by meaningful engagement, contribution and shared decision-making by individuals, groups, or organisations within a specific community or geographical area. To foster a sustainable Blue Economy, applicants can also take inspiration from the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund (EMFAF) 2021-2027, where coastal areas have the opportunity to support Community-Led Local Development (CLLD, https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/funding/local-partnerships_en) through Local Action Groups (LAGs) in fisheries and aquaculture areas (European Commission, Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, Community-led local development and the blue economy, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2771/392).]] actions.
- transition agendas[[ For this call, we define a transition agenda as a strategic roadmap towards reaching all objectives and targets of the Mission 'Restore our ocean and waters by 2030'.]].
Due to the nature of the work to be supported under the calls for community-led actions piloting innovative solutions, and transition agendas requiring high quality expertise, and because the financial support to third parties is one of the primary activities of this action enabling it to achieve its objectives, the contribution to a third party may go beyond EUR 60 000. The maximum amount to be granted to each third party is EUR 500,000[[In the case of a community-led action resulting from a cascading grant call, this applies to each beneficiary in the consortium of the community-led action, rather than the consortium as a whole.]] but may be higher if duly justified in the proposal.
A recipient may only benefit from the financial support to third parties once within the duration of the project.
6.Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
7.Specific conditions: described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard application form (HE CSA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2025 – 12. Missions
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2025 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2018/1046
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
17 proposals have been submitted under this call. The results of the evaluations are expected to be released by end of December 2024.
Following several topic updates published on the Funding and Tenders Portal for HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01, please be informed that the call deadline has been extended to 1st of October 2024 (17:00 Brussels time). In case you submitted your application, please check again the alignment with the clarifications published and re-submit your proposal.
We regret any inconvenience that might has been created and wish you a lot of success with your application.
Please note that “Other cost category (Financial Support to Third Parties, FSTP)” is missing from budget table in PART A of the submission forms. Works are in progress to correct the topic configuration and unhide the FSTP column. You will be promptly informed when the issue is resolved. It is recommended to postpone submissions until after the correction of the budget table.
Q: Can NCPs (National Contact Points) participate as beneficiaries in Horizon Europe projects?
A: At the Info Day where this topic was presented, the question was raised whether Horizon Europe or Mission NCPs can participate as beneficiaries in this topic. In this regard it should be pointed out, that for NCPs it is important to avoid situations that could later give rise to potential conflicts of interest, particularly where the host organisation of a NCP may itself become an applicant in a proposal or use its NCP status to gain or grant undue advantage. To this end, all NCPs upon nomination have confirmed to DG RTD in writing that they have read and accepted the Minimum Standards and guiding principles for setting up systems of National Contact Points (NCP systems) under Horizon Europe, and in particular the sections on confidentiality and avoidance of conflict of interest (7. Confidentiality and 8. Conflict of Interest).
Accordingly, we would like to underline that in line with section 8, letter d) “An NCP must not participate in a proposal or in a project in relation to the work programme part where it provides NCP services, unless, in exceptional circumstances, the Commission allows such participation, due to the specific nature of a given call (e.g. , European Partnerships, dedicated CSAs for transnational cooperation between NCPs or collaboration between research funders).”
Participation, according to section 8, letter c) of the Minimum Standards means: “[…] In this context “participation in a proposal or in a project” means a named NCP identified as either carrying out the R&I activities, or in an advisory or supporting role (e.g. project advisory board). NCPs, acting in that capacity, shall not provide letters of support or similar documents in relation to specific proposals.”
It should also be reminded that according to section 8, letter e) of the minimum Standards separate provisions apply when an host organisations of NCPs act as an applicant and in the case NCPs participate in a proposal or in a project in relation to a work programme part other than the one where they provide NCPs services.
These provisions are included in the Minimum Standards to avoid the situation of NCPs receiving on the one hand from the Commission “[…] in-time general and specialist in-depth information for the appropriate performance of the NCPs at the earliest(7) on: […] b. Roadmaps, work programmes and upcoming calls;” – Footnote (7) “Before the release to the general public when possible.” In addition to the information that they receive from the potential applicants they assist, and on the other hand making use of this “privileged” information to gain undue competitive advantage over other applicants, if they apply.
Concerning the consequences for the breach of these provisions, according to the final paragraph of section 8 of the Minimum Standards “[…] Non-compliance may also lead to the consequences set in Articles 136 and 141 of the Financial Regulation (e.g. exclusion or rejection of a person or entity from participating in an award procedure or in an application/action).”
This means concretely potential consequences both for the NCPs themselves (e.g. “de-recognition” according to section 6 of the Minimum Standards and exclusion according to Article 136 of the Financial Regulation) and for the proposals with the rejection of the participant who was previously involved in the preparation of award procedure documents (e.g. the Work Programme) where this entails a breach of the principle of equality of treatment, including distortion of competition, that cannot be remedied otherwise, according to Article 141(1)(c) of the Financial Regulation.
Therefore, for the reasons explained above and to avoid consequences both for the NCPs and for the proposals, it is recommended that NCPs providing services to this part of the work programme (i.e. EU Missions) are not participating in this Call.
In case of doubt, the NCPs are kindly requested to use the channels communicated to them in order to contact the relevant DG R&I service.
Q: Which are the ‘Mission community actors’ eligible for financial support?
A: ‘Mission community actors’ are defined broadly and could be various types of individuals, public or private sector entities or other actors, located in Member States and Associated Countries, as long as they are proposing activities contributing clearly to the Mission objectives.
Q: From which countries should beneficiaries come from for the purpose of the additional condition requiring the consortium to include beneficiaries from at least two regions294 or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area?
A: Since the Mission Ocean and Waters Implementation Plan defines basins as “larger naturally, economically, societally, culturally and politically interconnected areas comprising multiple regions (as administrative entities) and extending over multiple Member States or associated countries along a river, or a sea’”, only regions of Member States and/or Associates Countries or associations including such regions shall be considered for the geographical delimitation of the respective lighthouse areas. This means that, in addition to the standard eligibility conditions described in General Annex B, the consortium must include as beneficiaries at least two regions from the respective lighthouse areas in Member States and/or Associates Countries or associations thereof. Provided that the conditions on the minimum consortium composition are met, any legal entity, regardless of its place of establishment, is eligible to participate.
Q: What is the definition of ‘associations thereof’ in the condition ‘the consortium must include beneficiaries from at least two regions or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area’?
A: In the context of topic HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01, ‘associations thereof’ refers to ‘associations of at least two regions’. It concerns a group of two or more regions registered as members of an association whose scope of activity falls within one of the eligible basins.
Q: Who should be a beneficiary for the purpose of the additional condition requiring the consortium to include beneficiaries from at least two regions294 or associations thereof from the respective lighthouse area?
A: Beneficiaries should be either 1) regions represented by the relevant public authorities, or 2) associations of the regions
Q: What is the definition of ‘regions’?
A: In the context the topic HORIZON-MISS-2024-OCEAN-02-01, ‘regions’ refers to geographical areas at sub-national level, defined as NUTS 2 and 3, corresponding to actual administrative units with their own representation/government: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/overview
Please note that the specific condition on the procedure: “Evaluation carried out by EU staff” should be interpreted to mean “Evaluation committee partially composed of EU representatives” in accordance with Article 29(1) of the HE Regulation and by extension General Annex F of the General Annexes.