Closed

Sustainability Lighthouse

HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-07
Programme
HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
January 16, 2024
Deadline
April 18, 2024
Deadline Model
single-stage
Budget
€10,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€10,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€10,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
1
Keywords
HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-07HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024Communication engineering and systems telecommunications

Description

Expected Outcome:

The Lighthouse project expected outcomes on both “Sustainable 6G” and “6G for sustainability” dimensions include:

  • Technologies and architectures enabling to offer and manage a systemic approach to sustainability covering at least energy, climate and environmental aspects, considering trust and security, availability, coverage, and accessibility, while targeting economic viability. It includes characterisation of AI/ML technologies design, development and use and the related impact on sustainability also including sustainable AI/ML mechanisms. An end-to-end perspective is considered including specific focus on the design phase and the complete life cycle where appropriate.
  • Consolidation of the work started in the SNS Phase 1 (e.g., Stream B System/Flagship Hexa-X-II project and Enablers projects) and early Phase 2 projects (use cases, KPIs/KVIs, dedicated technologies) and integration of their outcomes. Development of synergies with potentially any results from other R&I sources (e.g., other European and national projects) into a sustainability end-to-end set of tools, solutions and best practices.
  • In liaison with the SNS Call 2023 Societal Challenges CSA (HORIZON-JU-SNS-2023-STREAM-CSA-01: SNS Societal Challenges), contribution to the 6G social and societal acceptability with identification of key stakeholders to be engaged in specific interactions / expert groups (e.g., organisation of specific targeted workshops).
  • Co-development of “6G for sustainability” use-cases and business models that consider local, regional, and national economics, jointly with different stakeholders, including verticals, demonstrating and ideally quantifying how 6G contributes to the various aspects of sustainability in non-telecom sectors, including public sector and aspects related to citizen engagement. Contribution on standardized evaluation methodology on how the use of information and communication technology solutions impact greenhouse gas emissions / environmental impact/ trust and security, cost performance of other sectors.
  • Reference benchmarking scenarios, especially for implementation and operations, and for both sustainable 6G and 6G for sustainability, in view of further assessing sustainability gains of specific implementations and operations. It takes an E2E perspective, from service platform to devices.
  • Co-definition of specific 6G implementation models with stakeholders and end-users that considering technical performance, sustainability, economic trade-offs (including e.g., physics laws, network densification, architectural aspects, infrastructure sharing, neutral hosts, brokers…) and societal perspectives, raising sustainability awareness including improved sustainability literacy and education for use of applications, services and platforms and developing related recommendations for 6G implementation, operation and usage.
  • Derived methodologies, recommendations, guidelines and standardisation requirements covering the full life cycle where appropriate (energy and security in particular) and taking into account existing harmonisation perspectives originating from e.g. the EU Commission, GSMA, ETNO, NGMN.
  • Integration testing, evaluation and end-to-end validation of the key technical solutions.
  • Proof of concept on specific promising SNS Phase 1 technologies that will provide tangible results on environmental, societal and economic sustainable objectives.
  • A strategic roadmap and a European strategy towards sustainability as integral part of the 6G standardisation (“sustainability by design”), furthering the characterisation of KVIs, ideally as quantitative indicators, of various projects and aiming at contributing to the global 6G vision. This includes the development of solutions and inputs to standardisation bodies (including 3GPP, ETSI) and worldwide fora (e.g., NGMN, GSMA).
Objective:

Please refer to the "Specific Challenges and Objectives" section for Stream B in the Work Programme, available under ‘Topic Conditions and Documents - Additional Documents’.

Scope:

The Lighthouse project addresses both the “sustainable 6G” dimension and the “6G for sustainability” aspect as two related work areas. Sustainable 6G covers 6G system design with respect to related KPIs and KVIs with the objectives of working out quantitative (scientific) measures for sustainability assessment where appropriate, to define benchmarking scenarios that allow to assess sustainability performance for specific 6G implementation scenarios, taking into account the contemplated 6G architectures. As a baseline, sustainable 6G deals with 6G capability to optimise the energy and resource consumption both from operational and non-operational perspectives (sustainable 6G) of 6G platform, to maximise security/trust performances, to optimise economic accessibility and coverage and to minimise use case operation costs. These are though not limitative.

“6G for sustainability” addresses the contribution (benefits and challenges) of 6G to the various aspects of sustainability in vertical sectors (also referred as enablement effect). It focuses on how 6G can enable the verticals to be more sustainable, how to measure it and what research aspects still need to be tackled. This requires a deep knowledge of selected use-cases and their processes with potentially conflicting requirements (e.g. performance vs minimisation of energy consumption). Needed expertise should come from the selected sectors and stakeholders to make their processes more sustainable by means of 6G. Additional expertise beyond telecommunication and verticals sectors is expected.

Scientific/technological analyses of sustainability may then be used to define sustainability benchmarking or reference scenarios to validate specific implementation in a sustainability context. It is expected that the work under the Lighthouse project can then fuel industry recommendation, guidelines or standards.

“Sustainable 6G” and “6G for sustainability” should be equally addressed and will be considered through three dimensions of which: (i) environmental sustainability, targeting the minimisation of environmental impact, as a prominent issue (ii) societal sustainability, aiming at providing value to people and society also thanks to new use cases powered by 6G as well as the need to offer such services in a trustworthy, privacy-safeguarding and accessible way, and (iii) economic sustainability, where 6G will be an enabler for business value and could enable new business models. The targeted project scope includes:

  • Environmental Sustainability (including energy, climate and environmental aspects)
    • Sustainable 6G: (1) Improving energy efficiency and total energy consumption. It includes network and device side, e.g. enabling more energy efficient network operations covering power usage monitoring, multi-criteria optimisation, self-diagnose & healing. Minimization of EMF effects (2) Investigating network-device performance versus energy consumption trade-offs, (3) Evaluation from a system and life cycle perspective, using environmental metrics and (4) Developing strategies to ensure that AI/ML technique to be used in future 6G networks are environmentally sustainable, (5) Address energy resilience where the network and services adapt dynamically to the availability of renewable energy. This work of technological nature will be complemented by an analysis on how to improve material efficiency and circularity.
    • 6G for Sustainability: (1) Technologies and architectures enabling use cases to be “service aware” vis a vis the network platform, such that intelligent sustainability decisions may be made at use case level (2) Propose guidelines, recommendations and good practices and (3) Evaluate potential CO2 and other GHGs reductions as well as any other (and other environmental impacts reduction) in other sectors. Such reduction, enabled by 6G, might be related, for example, to more efficient operation of large infrastructure or industrial process leading to energy reduction and/or natural resource impact. Another example could be a better lifecycle management, enabled by 6G and leading to increased lifetime and improved re-use, upcycling and recycling of specific goods. It includes benchmark and quantified indicators for selected representative use cases. It considers the broader governance and policy needs to support such actions towards sustainability.
    • Note that attention maybe paid to the rebound effects connected to the design and development of 6G systems, while considering e.g., inclusivity-coverage/production-emissions, economic viability/TCO-affordability aspects.
  • Societal Sustainability
    • Improve the social footprint of 6G, such as: (1) Ensure key democracy values are preserved (Privacy, Trust, Resilience, Fairness, Digital Inclusion, Accessibility), (2) Focus on value for society and people, (3) Perform state-of-the-art analysis about the extent to which current networks and platforms address societal perspectives and (4) Elaborate on trends and drivers of societal digital inclusion with efficient solutions in all contexts.
    • Investigate how 6G can create added value for the society: (1) Considering different gender perspectives & citizens’ concerns and/or needs, (2) Answer how 6G does support social aspects, (3) Indicate 6G benefits for the end users & society and (4) Focus on inclusion and trustworthiness.
  • Economic Sustainability
    • Improve the economic viability of 6G by ensuring its ability to operate with controlled deployment and operational cost to enable stakeholder to adapt themselves in accordance with foreseen value of 6G services: (1) Provide flexibility in infrastructure and resources management, (2) Evolutivity and ability to adapt to news services/requirements, (3) Follow modular architectures to ease evolutions.
    • Evaluate economic aspects of 6G to support long-term economic development of society: (1) Evaluation of 6G ability to impact economy at large considering cost and value associated with 6G, (2) Identify economic trends and drivers for 6G market disruptions, opportunity and risks, (3) Identify key stakeholders, roles, relation and business potential for 6G ecosystem in selected verticals, (4) Define business and revenue models and total cost of ownership of 6G for key stakeholders and (5) Assess business impact of social aspects and environmental sustainability, as mentioned in the above text.

This threefold approach will drive the design and integration of technical solutions into a sustainability end-to-end set of tools and solutions. The work hence covers:

  • Validated technologies, systems and architectures needed to develop 6G as a sustainable platform, covering at least environmental sustainability, resource efficiency, cost, trust, security, and accessibility. Performance of key technologies in the sustainability context may be characterized as “standalone” but should preferably be demonstrated from an end-to-end perspective.
  • Definition of sustainability framework as part of the network management functions capable of monitoring and piloting sustainable operations and service implementations.
  • Reference sustainability scenarios and benchmarks, both for the 6G platform and for the targeted/supported use cases.
  • Characterisation of sustainability KPI and KVI’s, in view of their potential use at standardization level.
  • Validation of critical technologies for the sustainability solutions in experimental platforms and use case pilots.
  • Definition of the SNS approach towards sustainability.
  • Definition of downstream recommendations and guidelines towards sustainability implementation and operations in deployment contexts.

The project should work complementary and take into consideration the breakthroughs and results from the projects under the HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-D-01-01: SNS Large Scale Trials and Pilots (LST&Ps) with Verticals call.

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

General conditions

This topic deviates from the general conditions and includes additional conditions, which are explicitly stated in the Appendix 1 of the SNS R&I Work Programme 2024 ‘Additional Conditions of the SNS 2024 Call’

1. Admissibility conditions: described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System

The page limit for a full application is 100 pages for RIAs and IAs.

2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

At least half of the budget should be implemented by the SNS JU member (other than the Union) and their constituent or affiliated entities.

Applicants will be invited to fill a mandatory table of compliance at proposal stage in the Application Form Technical Description (Part B). Proposals that do not fulfil the above conditions, including the mandatory table of compliance, at the time of the proposal submission, will be considered ineligible and, therefore, will not be evaluated

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes

Part D of the General Annexes to the Horizon Europe Work Programme 2023-2024 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the SNS call 2024 covered by this Work Programme with the following complements:

The award criteria table is complemented as follows:

  • Introduction in the impact section of a sub criterion assessing the proposal contribution to the reinforcement of an EU added value, with particular attention to EU economic security objectives as well as economic security risks and the role of certain suppliers, as mentioned in the Commission Communication C(2023) 4049, in R&I activities. For the assessment of this sub criterion, the mandatory security declaration annexed to the proposal (see Appendix A, section 1.9 ii)) will also be taken into consideration. If this sub criterion is not addressed in a sufficiently effective way, this shall be considered as a significant weakness.
  • Introduction in the impact section of a sub-criterion assessing the proposal contribution to the overall SME objective as appropriate;
  • Introduction in the impact section of a sub-criterion assessing the proposal contribution to the IKOP objectives; 

 
  • Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual

Part F of the General Annexes to the Horizon Europe Work Programme 2023-2024 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the SNS call 2024 covered by this Work Programme with the following amendment related to the procedure to rank proposal with equal scores, used to establish the priority order:

  • When two RIA proposals are equally ranked and that it has not been possible to separate them using first the coverage criterion, second the excellence criterion, and third the generic Impact criterion (i.e., after step 2 of the procedure outlined in part F of the General Annex), the level of SME participation will be taken as the next criterion to sort out the ties and if still un-conclusive, the level of IKOP will be considered as appropriate. If still inconclusive, the procedure outlined in part F of the General Annex will be resumed from step 3 onwards.

 
  • Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes

 Funding rates

Please note that the funding rates in this topic are: 100% for non-for-profit organizations and 90% with respect to for-profit organizations. Unfortunately, the maximum funding rate in the budget table is set to 100%. We kindly ask all for-profit organizations to make a manual calculation and request only 90% of the budget.

 

Specific conditions

7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme, and in Appendix 1 to the WP: Additional Conditions of the SNS 2024 Call.

For more call-specific questions, please check the FAQ section

Project collaboration

As part of the call conditions, participants of selected projects will be requested to cooperate in the SNS Programme for topics of common interests by signing the collaboration agreement referred in the specific provisions of the Model Grant Agreement (MGA). 

Security provisions applicable to Streams B, C and D

In order to meet the security requirements specified under the above section Context and Objectives (Cybersecurity and Economic Security), all proposals submitted in Streams B, C and D, shall have to include security declarations, which demonstrate that the economic security risks (e.g. technology leakage and supply chain risks) have been identified and addressed and that the management of project results, technologies and equipment (including software and services) in the proposed project comply with relevant security requirements. In addition, they should indicate that required documents, information and results produced within the proposed project will be duly protected and not lead to exposure of sensitive information in the cybersecurity or economic security context to entities not established in Member States or countries associated to Horizon Europe, or entities controlled from third countries. Particular attention should be paid to mitigating the higher risks associated with certain network suppliers as mentioned in Commission Communication C(2023) 4049. As part of the security declaration the proposal shall contain information that: (a) Demonstrates that any economic security risks including: 1. resilience of supply chains; 2. physical and cyber security of critical infrastructure; 3. technology security and technology leakage; and 4. weaponisation of economic dependencies or economic coercion, are taken into account and are properly addressed. (b) Demonstrates that the infrastructure deployed within the proposed project shall remain, during the action and after its completion, within the beneficiary/beneficiaries and shall not be subject to control or restrictions by entities not established in Member States or countries associated to Horizon Europe, or entities controlled from third countries. (c) Demonstrates that for any equipment to be deployed for the implementation of the proposed project and/or used for the management and operation of the resulting digital connectivity infrastructure, the required documents and information will be duly protected and not exposed to entities not established in Member States or countries associated to Horizon Europe, or entities controlled from third countries. Special care should be taken to satisfy the Commission Communication C(2023) 4049 requirements in relation to higher risks associated with certain network suppliers. Based on this security declaration by the applicant, as well as the evaluation carried out by independent experts, the funding body may require security measures to be implemented in the project and/or carry out a security scrutiny focusing on the exchange of project information, documents and results considered as security-sensitive information among project partners

Support & Resources

 

JU SNS FAQ find the answers to most frequently asked questions on the JU SNS call.

SNS Brokerage Platform- we are offering an online Brokerage service where you can present you profile and interests and/or present your project Ideas for potential participants to see.

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.  

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

 

Latest Updates

Last Changed: April 19, 2024

PROPOSAL NUMBERS

Call HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024 has closed on the 18 April 2024 at 17.00.00

109 proposals have been submitted.

The breakdown per topic is:

  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-01: 26 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-02: 26 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-03: 15 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-04: 15 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-05: 3 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-06: 1 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-07: 2 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-08: 8 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-C-01-01: 2 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-CSA-01: 1 proposals
  • HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-D-01-01: 10 proposals

 

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in July 2024

Last Changed: April 5, 2024

Please note that the deadline to apply for 6G-IA membership is the 31st of March 2024. After that time it cannot be guaranteed that membership applications will be processed in time

Last Changed: January 16, 2024
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-D-01-01(HORIZON-JU-IA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-08(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-03(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-06(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-C-01-01(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-07(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-01(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-CSA-01(HORIZON-JU-CSA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-05(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-04(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-SNS-2024-STREAM-B-01-02(HORIZON-JU-RIA)
Last Changed: December 8, 2023

 Please note that the funding rates in this topic are: 100% for non-for-profit organizations and 90% with respect to for-profit organizations. Unfortunately, the maximum funding rate in the budget table is set to 100%. We kindly ask all for-profit organizations to make a manual calculation and request only 90% of the budget.

Sustainability Lighthouse | Grantalist