Closed

Expanding translational knowledge in minipigs: a path to reduce and replace non-human primates in non-clinical safety assessment

HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-01-two-stage
Programme
Innovative Health Initiative JU Call 4
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
July 26, 2023
Deadline
November 7, 2023
Deadline Model
two-stage
Budget
€83,350,000
Min Grant Amount
€33,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€33,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
1
Keywords
HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-01-two-stageHORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-two-stageAnimal behaviourAnimal housingAnimal immunologyAnimal welfareGenetically modified organismsLaboratory animal scienceMachine learning, statistical data processing and applications using signal processing (e.g. speech, image, video)Safety PharmacologyToxicology

Description

Expected Impact:

EU legislation1 makes it a legal obligation to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in research (the ‘3Rs’ principle), including a specific focus on restricting the use of the non-human primates (NHPs) unless scientifically justified. The development of in vitro models for human safety assessment is still challenging due to complex biological responses in various organ systems following drug treatment. Therefore, laboratory animals will still be requested in the safety testing of new therapeutics and innovative medical technologies until non-animal approaches have reached the necessary level of maturity and validation to ensure that only safe treatments reach patients, and that patients get timely access to the most innovative therapeutics.

A substantial amount of work has already been conducted to increase the scientific knowledge and understanding of the role of minipigs in toxicity testing2 and the pig is often used e.g., in the toxicological evaluation of small molecules. Replacing NHPs with minipigs in the safety testing of new therapeutic modalities has been, however, more difficult, due to lack of translational knowledge, but will be an important ethical step towards minimising the use of NHPs. New drug modalities are often designed to engage human targets with high specificity, which is the rationale for selecting NHPs in the safety testing of this kind of drug candidates. By expanding the translational knowledge in minipigs versus NHPs and humans, the scientific justification for selecting pigs as an alternative to NHPs can be improved.

The project funded under this topic adheres to the principles of the 3Rs by: i) closing the current translational knowledge gaps regarding minipigs versus NHPs and humans, offering the opportunity to replace NHPs with pigs, improve the reproducibility of pig studies, and advance the underlying knowledge of biological processes to facilitate the development of non-animal alternatives (reduce, refine and replace); ii) creating scientific and technological opportunities in animal housing facilities to collect, digitalise and generate more reproducible data in freely moving, undisturbed animals with the potential to reduce the total number of animals, and improve animal welfare and data quality (reduce, refine).

Closing the translational knowledge gap regarding minipigs versus NHPs and humans will enable the development of new, refined, and digital research tools, which will contribute to:

  • reducing and replacing the overall number of NHPs in research without compromising human safety.
  • improving disease understanding that will open up new research pathways, and enhanced use of non-invasive digital technologies that can improve animal welfare (refinement), and furthermore, are potentially applicable to humans.
  • improving the sustainability and quality of biomedical research and development (R&D) in areas of unmet medical need by ensuring access to well-characterised minipig models in R&D of new therapeutics and innovative medical technologies.
  • optimising knowledge sharing between academia, regulators, and the health care industry to accelerate the generation of knowledge and medical innovation.
  • fostering the development and validation of non-animal models and approaches by implementing translational data obtained in the future project, which could pave the way to such models. Data generation will be based on early discussions with regulatory authorities and academic partners, thereby ensuring the contribution to the development and validation of non-animal approaches.

1 DIRECTIVE 2010/63/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes; https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0063

2 The RETHINK project on minipigs in the toxicity testing of new medicines and chemicals: Conclusions and recommendations. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2010.05.008

Expected Outcome:
  • Obtain and share biological knowledge of minipigs, thereby facilitating the development of innovative solutions by improving the translational understanding between minipigs versus NHPs and humans, including further understanding of the minipig immune system, with the overall aim to replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in non-clinical safety assessment.
  • A regulatory pathway for nonclinical safety assessment of biologicals and other new therapeutic modalities in minipigs with the potential to impact regulatory strategies.
  • Publicly available databases and software for physiological, genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, proteomic and epigenetic minipig data to understand underlying mechanisms of disease/toxicities and find new mode of actions for pharmaceutical interventions.
  • Characterised and validated genetically modified minipig models:
    • genetically modified minipig models based on the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology.
    • minipigs with ‘humanised’ immune system components and effectors for testing biologicals.
    • small–sized micropig for efficacy/safety assessment to facilitate compound availability in pharmaceutical R&D.
  • Assessment of the utility of the minipig as a relevant toxicology species for immuno-safety testing using therapeutics which have been tested preclinically and clinically. Assisting and synergising the already existing translational and regulatory efforts related to immunological safety evaluation. Developing validated antibodies and in vitro immunoassays to characterise the immune system and assess the immuno-safety of therapeutics in minipigs.
  • Minipig-specific technology for automated study data: validated medical devices, biosensors, algorithms, software, and digital animal housing. Machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools to monitor abnormalities in behaviour and physiological systems in undisturbed animals.

To ensure long-term sustainability, all the interdisciplinary science-based knowledge obtained and generated in the project arising from this topic will be shared, integrated, digitalised, and published in peer-reviewed journals, encouraging industry and academia to develop innovative medical science solutions and technologies, such as scientifically and ethically sound animal models, assays, biomarkers, monitoring devices, biosensors for normal physiological behaviour, and algorithms. Based on the close collaboration with regulatory bodies, the knowledge generated in the project is further expected to impact regulatory guideline strategies. All outputs will require long-term sustainability and maintenance to fulfil the scope of the project.

Scope:

Challenges

  • Increasing need to find alternatives to testing in NHPs in line with EU legislation.
  • Almost no precedence in minipig use for safety testing of biologicals and new therapeutic modalities [e.g., oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs (SiRNAs), crystallisable fragments (Fcs), antigen-binding fragments (Fabs), single-chain variable fragments (scFvs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), vaccines, gene-editing and cell-based therapies].
  • Lack of scientific knowledge to scientifically justify a de-selection of NHPs in the non-clinical safety assessment of new therapeutics. Lack of public minipig reference ’omics’ with good quality annotation: Full genome sequencing, in parallel with baseline transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and epigenetic information.
  • Lack of ‘humanised” and genetically modified models available for efficacy/safety testing, including genetically modified smaller micropigs to address cases of limited substance supply.
  • Significant knowledge gap on the minipig immune system and reduced number of laboratory tools and reagents when compared to other toxicology species (rodent and non-rodent).
  • Lack of widespread use of biosensors, medical devices, ‘intelligent’ animal housing for automated data collection and analysis in minipig studies.

Objectives

The overall objective of this topic is to characterise the minipig for use in R&D of new therapeutics and innovative medical technologies. The knowledge generated in this proposal may facilitate innovative health solutions and improve disease understanding and human predictions. The goal is to advance biomedical R&D by generating background scientific data to evaluate if the minipigs could be a viable and feasible alternative to NHPs in key therapeutic areas, with a special focus on translatability from minipigs to humans.

Key activities

  1. Compile and publish existing historical safety data in minipig biomedical R&D and discuss data with regulators.
  2. Evaluate the translatability of minipigs in human risk assessment following treatment with biologicals and new therapeutic modalities, and discuss future perspectives of the minipigs with regulatory agencies, e.g., by requesting regulatory interactions with European Medicines Agency (EMA) such as scientific advice and/or novel methodology qualification advice to understand possible regulatory hurdles in using minipigs for safety assessment.
  3. Minipigs multi-omics and imaging: Generate omics reference data (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenetic information) to enable translational research in minipigs. To further characterise the minipig, imaging technologies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) scans are also of interest.
  4. Genetically modified pig models including the micro-pig: Characterise and validate humanised and genetically modified minipig models, including the micropig to generate translatable animal models in non-clinical safety assessment.
  5. iPig: Digital technologies, clinical data collection and AI: Create, validate, qualify, and benchmark digital solutions that can objectively measure clinically relevant and functional biomarkers in minipigs for use in preclinical toxicity studies in line with the regulatory agencies’ requirements.
  6. Minipig immune system: validate reagents, assays, and biomarkers for immunological investigations: Conduct investigative studies in minipigs to support their translational significance in immuno-safety assessments and validate reagents/assays.
  7. Project management: Compile, digitalise, and publish existing and newly-produced data.

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility conditions: described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System

  • at stage 1 of a two-stage Call, the limit for RIA short proposals is 20 pages;
  • at stage 2 of a two-stage Call, the limit for RIA full proposals is 50 pages.

2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes and in the ''Conditions of the Calls for proposals and Calls management rules'' section of the IHI JU Work Programme (WP)

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes and in the ''Conditions of the Calls for proposals and Calls management rules'' section of the IHI JU Work Programme (WP)

  • Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual

  • Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

Specific conditions

7. Specific conditions: described in the described in the ''Conditions of the Calls for proposals and Calls management rules" section of the IHI JU Work Programme (WP)

- specific conditions on Availability, Accessibility and Affordability (3A) do not apply for this topic

- JU's right to object to transfer/exclusive licensing

Documents

 

The IHI JU 4th Call for proposals full topics text is available here

 

Evaluation form (single and two-stage Calls)

- IHI JU Evaluation form for Research and Innovation Actions (single and two-stage Calls)

  

Proposal Templates Part A and Part B (Research and Innovation Actions – stage one of two-stage procedure) 

- Proposal template - Part A of the proposal is generated by the IT system in the submission environment (for more information see the HE Part A template here). In Part A of the proposal applicants insert general information on their proposal (e.g. proposal acronym), details on the participants and the overall proposal budget. Please note that only Part A of this template is applicable for this Call. For Part B, see point below.

- IHI JU Proposal template (RIA/SP) - Part B

- IHI JU Proposal template (RIA/FP) - Part B (Only applicable to the second stage of two-stage Calls)

  

Proposal Annexes

- Annex: Type of Participants

The “type of participants” is an IHI specific annex. The excel template can be found here and the instructions on how to fill in this template can be found here.

This is a compulsory annex, and it must be uploaded as a separate document in the submission system.

This annex is applicable to single-stage and two-stage Calls.

- Annex: Declaration of in-kind contribution commitment

The “Declaration of in-kind contribution commitment” is an IHI specific annex.

The word document template can be found here.

This is a is a compulsory annex and it must be uploaded as a separate document in the submission system.

This annex is applicable to the second stage of two-stage Calls.

- Annex: In-kind contributions to additional activities (IKAA)

The ‘’In-kind contributions to additional activities (IKAA)’’ is an IHI specific annex. The excel template can be found here and the instructions on how to fill in this template can be found here.

This is an optional annex and it is applicable to the second stage of two-stage Calls.

- Annex: Essential information for clinical studies

The information on clinical studies is a Horizon Europe annex.

This is a is a compulsory annex and it must be uploaded as a separate document in the submission system.

If your proposal does not include clinical studies, please upload a statement declaring your proposal does not include clinical studies.

The information on clinical studies annex can be found here:

The annex is applicable to the second stage of two-stage Calls.

- Annex: Ethics

This is a HE annex. Ethics self-assessment should be included in proposal part A. However, in Calls where several serious ethics issues are expected, the characters limit in this section of proposal part A may not be sufficient for participants to give all necessary information. In those cases, participants may include additional information in an annex to proposal part B. 

This is an optional annex and it is applicable to the second stage of two-stage Calls.

- Annex to the budget for the Full Proposal 

This is a compulsory Annex, which complements the budget figures already included in the proposal budget in PART A. Its purpose is to correctly guide the consortium in providing IHI-specific budget items (e.g. IKOP, IKAA, FC PAID, FC RECEIVED, etc.) and to comply with IHI additional eligibility criteria (e.g. 45% industry contribution).

The annex is applicable to the second stage of two-stage Calls.

 

 Model Grant Agreement (MGA)

 - HE General MGA v1.0

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.  

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

Latest Updates

Last Changed: January 25, 2024

An overview of the evaluation results of the first stage of IHI Call 4, can be found in the Flash Call Info Report

Last Changed: November 9, 2023

Call HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-two-stage Stage 1 submission has closed as of the 8th November 2023.

17 proposals have been submitted in total. The breakdown per topic is:

HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-01: 3 proposals

HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-02: 4 proposals

HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-03: 2 proposals

HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-04: 5 proposals

HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-05: 1 proposals

HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-06: 2 proposals

Last Changed: July 27, 2023
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-01-two-stage(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-06-two-stage(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-02-two-stage(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-04-two-stage(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-03-two-stage(HORIZON-JU-RIA), HORIZON-JU-IHI-2023-04-05-two-stage(HORIZON-JU-RIA)
Expanding translational knowledge in minipigs: a path to reduce and replace non-human primates in non-clinical safety assessment | Grantalist