Global collaboration action for the development of vaccines for reducing the disease burden of Tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa
HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-TB-01-two-stage
- Programme
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-two-stage
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- January 30, 2025
- Deadline
- March 20, 2025
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €30,900,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €10,300,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €10,300,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 3
- Keywords
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-TB-01-two-stageHORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-two-stageChild healthClinical trialsGlobal healthImmunologyInfectious diseasesPoverty related diseasesPublic healthRespiratory systemsStatistics in clinical trials, Phase IStatistics in clinical trials, Phase IIStatistics in clinical trials, Phase IIITuberculosisVaccines
Description
Expected impact
The actions funded under this topic should contribute to increased international cooperation among researchers and funders, catalyse research synergies, and leverage resources and investments in order to achieve the reduction of disease burden in SSA through the development of vaccines.
Proposals are expected to include the effective in-kind and/or financial contribution of contributing partners, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the impact of the related researchactivities.
Applicant consortium
The contributions from contributing partners should correspond to the amounts they have committed in the letter of endorsement requesting to become a contributing partner (Article 9 Council Regulation (EU) 2021/2085). Their contributions can consist of financial contributions and/or in-kind contributions. Applicant contributing partners must submit the endorsement letter for approval by the Global Health EDCTP3 Governing Board before the deadline for submission of the second-stage applications. It is recommended that the draft letter is submitted to the Global Health EDCTP3 Programme Office sufficiently ahead of deadline for submission of proposals to allow the review[1].
In case of in-kind contribution (even combined with financial contribution), contributing partners become a part of the applicant consortium and participate in the project, as appropriate i.e. as beneficiaries orAffiliated entities in the meaning of Article 8 of the Horizon Europe model grant agreement.
[1] The Global Health Programme Office will ask the applicant contributing partner to revise the letter in case it significantly departs from the template letter published on the Global Health EDCTP3 JU website or is missing any compulsory elements. The preliminary assessment by the Programme Office does not consider the merits of the application. The final decision as to acceptance or rejection of a new contributing partner rests with the Global Health EDCTP3 JU Governing Board
Expected Outcome:Background
Tuberculosis (TB) is a preventable and usually curable disease. Yet in 2022, TB was the world’s second leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, after coronavirus disease (COVID-19), and caused almost twice as many deaths as HIV/AIDS. More than 10 million people continue to fall ill with TB every year. Moreover, adolescents and adults account for over 80% of the TB burden and are the main source of transmission, including to children.
The main health care intervention available to reduce the risk of TB infection progressing to active TB disease, is TB preventive treatment. Other preventive interventions include vaccination of children with the bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine, which can confer protection, especially from severe forms of TB in children. Whereas TB vaccination is the most cost-effective and efficient approach in tackling this challenge, no new vaccines for prevention of all forms of TB have been licensed for over 100 years. BCG offers inconsistent protection against TB in adolescents and adults. Several TB vaccines are currently in clinical development, including some in phase III.
As part of the 2023 United Nations (UN) Declaration on TB, world leaders adopted a historical declaration with ambitious commitments to universal access to TB services in both high and low burden countries, with time-bound targets of reaching, with health services, at least 90% of people with or at risk of TB between 2023 and 2027, to increased investments in the TB response (including for research and innovation), and to fast-tracking the development and availability of new tools to prevent, diagnose and treat TB, particularly new TB vaccines. This includes USD 5 billion by 2027 for TB research and innovation, especially to high- burden countries. The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria remains the main international donor (USD 9,2 billion for the three epidemics) and the Gates foundation the main contributor from the non- governmental sector. Among others, the other main funders include: Biofabri, company X, EDCTP, European Commission, Germany Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Global Affairs Canada, Indian Council of Medical Research, Innovative Health Initiative, L’Initiative, Novo Nordisk Foundation, Open Philanthropy, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Oxford Immunotec, Unitaid, US Agency for International Development, US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, US National Institutes of Health and Wellcome Trust.
This investment will build on and complement the previous EDCTP2 investments which involved at least two TB vaccine candidates in late-stage clinical development and played a pivotal role in the development of the Global TB Vaccine R&D roadmap. This call for proposals is part of the implementation of this roadmap that prioritises diversifying the TB vaccines pipeline and accelerating clinical development ofvaccine candidates with an end-to-end approach to maximise public health impact.
Expected Outcome
This topic aims at supporting activities that contribute to one or several of the expected impacts for this call. To that end, proposals submitted under this topic should aim for delivering results that are directed, tailoredtowards and contributing to at least two of the following expected outcomes, with the first being mandatory:
- Obtain evidence of immunogenicity, efficacy, safety or clinical utility on vaccine candidates under development and licensed vaccine(s);
- Generate clinical data on TB prophylactic vaccines serving adolescents and adults, and including where appropriate pregnant and lactating women, new-borns, children, other vulnerable and neglected populations, and people with co-infections and co-morbidities at risk in SSA;
- Contribute to the data package related to immunisation/vaccination enabling public health authorities and policy makers to recommend on vaccination strategies, publish updated or new evidence-based clinical guidelines and best practices or design tailor-made TB policies targeting SSA.
Scope
The objective of the topic is to progress the development of vaccine candidates under development and licensed TB vaccines, especially targeting the population in low-middle countries, particularly in SSA.
Proposals should carry out early and/or late-stage clinical studies to evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, efficacy and/or clinical utility on vaccine candidates under development and licensed vaccines in SSA. Proposals are to generate clinical data on TB prophylactic vaccines in adults and adolescents, and including where appropriate, pregnant and lactating women, new-borns, children, other vulnerable and neglected populations, and people with co-infections and co-morbidities at risk in SSA when relevant. A comparative arm with BCG and an assessment of overall health outcomes may be included when appropriate.
Implementation research is not in the scope of this topic.
Proposals submitted against this topic are expected to leverage financial and/or in-kind contribution from contributing partners. Proposals should define the activities of their project in its entirety, including details of the component(s) for which Global Health EDCTP3 JU funding is requested and the component(s) that are to be financed by contributing partners. Proposals should carefully consider WHO's Product Profile Characteristics and/or Evidence Considerations for Vaccine Policy framework. Applicants need to concisely describe any prior relevant research findings and explain how the proposal builds on available data (including data generated in scope of earlier EDCTP programmes if available). Full details of the development milestones, including specific go/no-go criteria for the implementation of the proposed clinical trial(s) must be included, as well as specific plans for the subsequent regulatory approval process, which should aim at obtaining relevant market authorisation. and an access strategy that will allow patients in low- resource settings to access the final product.
The applicants are encouraged to consider new adaptive trial designs and lessons learnt from COVID-19 potentially allowing for shorter development timelines.
Proposals should engage communities and relevant stakeholders, most notably (local) key opinion leaders, researchers or clinical Investigators, health care professionals, policy makers, public health authorities and end-users. Applicants should provide methodologies for translating research findings into public health practice and policy guidelines.
Where possible, collaboration and coordination with the Team Europe Initiative on Manufacturing and Access to Vaccines, medicines and health products (TEI-MAV+) or similar African initiatives is encouraged. The applicants could show, for example, willingness to enter into technology transfer agreements with their counterparts - including the provision of patents, technical knowledge and know-how -, or early engagement with regulators or with African manufacturers to support the translation into affordableproducts adapted to the regional market.
Applicants are reminded of the expectation that proposals should come from research consortia with a strong representation of institutions and researchers from sub-Saharan African countries, including active participation of Franco/Lusophone countries, if possible. Collaboration with other international research groups with relevant experience is very much encouraged. Applicants are also reminded of the expectation of reaching out to institutions/organisations in countries with high disease burden but with relatively lower research capacities.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
The conditions are described in General Annex B except for the specific conditions for the Global Health EDCTP3 JU funding as regards entities eligible for funding and consortium composition, the specific rule for countries where the coordinator may be established and the obligation to designate a scientific project leader as below.
Specific conditions replacing the relevant sections in General Annex B to the Horizon Europe Work Programmes.
A. Entities eligible for funding
This section applies to both Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) and Coordination and Support Actions (CSA).
To become a beneficiary, legal entities must be eligible for funding. To be eligible for funding, applicants must be established in one of the following countries:
- The Member States of the European Union, including their outermost regions: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden;
- The Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) linked to the Member States: Aruba (NL), Bonaire (NL), Curação (NL), French Polynesia (FR), French Southern and Antarctic Territories (FR), Greenland (DK), New Caledonia (FR), Saba (NL), Saint Barthélemy (FR), Sint Eustatius (NL), Sint Maarten (NL), St. Pierre and Miquelon (FR), Wallis and Futuna Islands (FR);
- Countries associated to Horizon Europe[1]: Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Georgia, Iceland, Israel, Kosovo[2], Moldova, Montenegro, New Zealand (associated to Pillar II 'Global Challenges and European Industrial Competitiveness' as from the Work Programmes 2023 onwards, including for the institutionalised European partnerships), North Macedonia, Norway, Serbia, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom;
- Until association agreements start producing legal effects either through provisional application or their entry into force, transitional arrangements apply. The transitional arrangements apply, at the time of the adoption of this Work Programme, with regard to the following countries and legal entities established in these countries, with which association negotiations are being processed or where association is imminent):Morocco, South Korea, Switzerland
- The following countries which are constituent states of the EDCTP Association [3]: Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Eswatini, Gabon, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea-Conakry, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Republic of the Congo, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Legal entities which are established in countries not listed above will be eligible for funding if provided for in the specific call/topic conditions, or if their participation is considered essential for implementing the action by the granting authority.
Entities established in low- and middle-income countries that are not members of the EDCTP Association and listed in the Horizon Europe List of Participating Countries on the Funding & Tenders Portal [4] are not eligible for funding unless the specific country in which the entity is established, is associated to Horizon Europe or if the participation of the entity is considered essential for implementing the action by the granting authority.
B. Consortium composition
Unless otherwise provided for in the specific call conditions, for all actions, due to the policy objectives of the Global Health EDCTP3 JU, legal entities forming a consortium are eligible to participate in actions under the programme provided that the consortium includes as beneficiaries:
- At least three legal entities independent from each other and each established in a different country, where legal entities are eligible to receive funding;
- At least one independent legal entity established in a Member State, or in an associated country to Horizon Europe that is a member of the EDCTP Association; and
- At least one independent legal entity established in a sub-Saharan African country that is a member of the EDCTP Association.
This condition applies to both Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) and Coordination and SupportActions (CSA).
For the two CSA topics, i.e. topic HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-02-FELLOW-01-two-stage and topic HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-03-NETWORKS-01-two-stage - according to which the EDCTP Association is obligatorily part of the consortium as coordinator, the EDCTP Association must not be counted as one of the three independent legal entities necessary to ensure the eligibility of the consortium composition.
Specific cases:
Affiliated entities — Affiliated entities are eligible for funding if they are established in one of the countries listed above, or in a country identified in the specific call/topic conditions.
Associated partners — Entities not eligible for funding and therefore not able to participate as beneficiaries or affiliated entities (i.e. entities which participate in the action without signing the grant agreement, and without the right to charge costs or claim contributions) are allowed, subject to any conditions regarding associated partners set out in the specific call conditions.
International organisations – International European research organisations are eligible to receive funding. Other international organisations are not eligible to receive funding unless their participation is considered essential for implementing the action by the granting authority. International organisations with headquarters in a Member State or associated country are eligible to receive funding when provided for in the specific call conditions.
Specific rules regarding legal entities that may be the coordinator of an indirect action
In accordance with Article 110(2) of the Council Regulation 2021/2085 establishing the Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe[5], where entities established in a third country without an agreement to protect the financial interests of the Union participate with funding in an indirect action, the coordinator of the indirectaction must be established in a Member State or associated country, or South Africa.
Scientific project leader
If the coordinator is not established in a country in SSA (please see previous paragraph), the designation of a scientific project leader established in a SSA country member of the EDCTP Association with the roles as described below is mandatory. A work package on ‘scientific project leadership’ must be included in the proposals and budget needs to be provided for this activity. The scientific project leader oversees the project scientific governance and leadership. For this purpose, proposals must include a work package where the details of scientific project leadership are laid down. The scientific project leader should indicatively perform the following tasks:
- During the call for proposals and selection process, coordinate meetings on and drafting of the full project proposal;
- Work with the coordinator and other beneficiaries on the drafting and negotiation of the consortium agreement and other legal agreements among the beneficiaries;
- Act as the key contact point for the Global Health EDCTP3 JU regarding all scientific action governance issues, steer and provide oversight in the development of the scientific actions, without prejudice to the tasks entrusted directly to the coordinator as per the Model Grant Agreement;
- Support and collaborate with the coordinator on its monitoring activities and the adoption of appropriate internal measures, to ensure that beneficiaries are fulfilling their obligations regarding budget, timeline, deliverables, and scientific quality;
- Review the action’s deliverables and reports before their submission by the coordinator;
- Lead the work packages(s) related to the tasks of scientific project leadership.
Annex 1 to the grant agreement and the consortium agreement should address the relationship of the scientific project leader with the coordinator regarding their respective tasks, for example sharing of the information received from or sent to the Global Health EDCTP3 JU on all issues of interest for the proper scientific management of the action.
[1] The list is correct at the time of adoption of this work programme. Please see the Horizon Europe List of Participating Countries on the Funding & Tenders Portal for up-to-date information on the current list and on the position for Associated Countries: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/common/guidance/list-3rd-country-participation_horizon-euratom_en.pdf
[2] This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
[3] The list is correct at the time of adoption of this work programme. For an update, please check the EDCTP Association website www.edctp.org
[4] Horizon Europe List of Participating Countries on the Funding & Tenders Portal https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/common/guidance/list-3rd-country-participation_horizon-euratom_en.pdf
[5] Council Regulation (EU) 2021/2085 of 19 November 2021 establishing the Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe and repealing Regulations (EC) No 219/2007, (EU) No 557/2014, (EU) No 558/2014, (EU) No 559/2014, (EU) No 560/2014, (EU) No 561/2014 and (EU) No 642/2014. OJ L 427, 30.11.2021, p. 17–119; Regulation - 2021/2085 - EN - EUR-Lex (europa.eu).
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
Specific conditions related to Scores and weighting
Replacing the scores and weighting section in General Annex D to the Horizon Europe Work Programmes as regards second stage of two-stage evaluations, for both Research and Innovation Actions (RIA) and Coordination and Support Actions (CSA)
Evaluation scores will be awarded for the criteria, and not for the different aspects listed in the table. For full applications, each criterion will be scored out of 5. The threshold for individual criteria 1 (Excellence) and 2 (Impact) will be 4 and for criterion 3 (Quality and Efficiency of the implementation) will be 3. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 12.
Proposals that pass the individual threshold and the overall threshold will be considered for funding, within the limits of the available call budget. Other proposals will be rejected.
Nota bene, for the first stage of the two-stage evaluation of both RIAs and CSAs, the scores and weightingas indicated in Annex D of the General Annexes of the Horizon Europe work programme 2023/2025 apply.
In addition to the aspects of award criteria included in General Annex D, the following aspects are taken into consideration during the evaluation of second-stage proposals:
- For the ‘impact’ criterion: Production of meaningful and significant effects enhancing the impact of the relevant research activities via the inclusion of effective in-kind and/or financial contribution of contributing partners.
- For the ‘quality and efficiency of the implementation’ criterion: Leveraging of financial and/or in-kind contributions from contributing partners that are equal or greater than the requested JU contribution, in order to ensure the necessary resources and effort for the action.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Implementing the provision on affordable access as defined in Article 114 of the Council Regulation 2021/2085 establishing52, grants awarded under this topic will have to include in their Plan for the exploitation and dissemination of results including communication activities to be submitted during the project as a deliverable also the following:
Access plan
Participants must include in their Plan for the exploitation and dissemination of results an appropriate and proportionate access plan that demonstrates their strategies to ensure that the products and services that they develop based or partly based on the results of clinical studies undertaken by their project are affordable, available and accessible to the public (market and end-users) at fair and reasonable conditions. This covers registration targets, plans to meet demand, flexible approaches to IP, engagement with regulators and manufacturers where relevant and other strategies that reflect ability to pay and ensures that economic barriers to access are low. In addition, participants should add, if relevant, as part of the plan, an outline on how to achieve the optimal use of an intervention including, for example, how to avoid irrational use, overuse or abuse (e.g. antimicrobials).
In addition to any updates during the project, a final version of the Plan for the exploitation and dissemination of results including the above access plan, must also be submitted with the final report of the project.
Also in line with Article 114 of the Council Regulation 2021/2085, participants will be subject to the following additional exploitation obligations:
- Participants must – up to four years after the end of the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1) – use their best efforts to ensure that resulting health technologies and services will be broadly available and accessible, as soon as possible and at fair and reasonable conditions. In this respect, if, despite a participants’ best efforts, the results are not exploited within one year after the end of the action, participants must (unless otherwise agreed in writing with the granting authority) use the Horizon Results Platform to find interested parties to exploit the results.
- In case the participants cannot fulfil the preceding obligation, the participants must (if requested by the granting authority) grant non- exclusive licences - under fair and reasonable conditions - to their results to legal entities that commit to rapidly and broadly exploiting the resulting health technologies and services and ensure that they are broadly available and accessible, as soon as possible and at fair and reasonable conditions.
- In case of transfer of the ownership or licensing of results, participants must pass on such additional exploitation obligations to the legal entities exploiting the results.
- For up to four years after the action (see Data Sheet, Point 1), the funding body must be informed every year about the status of the development of the product and any other exploitation of the results through an annual report that is due on each anniversary of the end of the grant agreement.
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
JU right to object to transfer/exclusive licensing
The Global Health EDCTP3 JU may, up to 4 years after the end of the action, object to a transfer of ownership or to the exclusive licensing of results, as set out in the specific provision of Annex 5 of the Model Grant Agreement. In addition, in accordance with Article 24(3) of Council Regulation 2021/2085 establishing the Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe [1] and the Model Grant Agreement, the right toobject applies also to participants that have not received funding from the JU.
[1] Council Regulation (EU) 2021/2085 of 19 November 2021 establishing the Joint Undertakings under Horizon Europe and repealing Regulations (EC) No 219/2007, (EU) No 557/2014, (EU) No 558/2014, (EU) No 559/2014, (EU) No 560/2014, (EU) No 561/2014 and (EU) No 642/2014; OJ L 427, 30.11.2021, p. 17.
Access to information and involvement of contributing partners.
Evaluation
Global Health EDCTP3 may invite any contributing partners providing financial contributions under a certain topic to propose one representative as observer to participate in the evaluation process under confidentiality safeguards. This possibility does not apply to contributing partners that are part of a consortium submitting a proposal under the relevant topic.
Reports and deliverables
By applying under any topic, participants consent that the JU reserves the right to share their project reports and deliverables with contributing partners providing financial contributions under the relevant topic. Global Health EDCTP3 may consult the relevant contributing partners for the purpose of assessing the reports and deliverables. The reports and deliverables will be shared under confidentiality safeguards.
Other requirements
For all projects under this topic, if the coordinator is not from a country in SSA, the designation of a scientific project leader with the roles as described in the introduction is mandatory. A work package on ‘scientific project leadership’ must be included in the proposals and budget needs to be provided for this activity.
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Note: despite blind evaluation being mentioned in the standard application form for stage 1 proposals, available in the Funding and Tenders Portal (at the stage of adoption of this Work Programme), please note that this call is not part of the ‘blind evaluation pilot’, therefore no anonymisation is required for stage 1proposals of the two-stage calls.
Standard application form (HE RIA IA Stage 1)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA and CSA Stage 1)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2025 – 4. Health
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2025 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-two-stage has closed on 03.09.2025.
27 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-TB-01-two-stage:6
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-MALARIA-02-two-stage:9
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-NTD-03-two-stage:12
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in January 2026.
EVALUATION RESULTS (STAGE 1)
Published: 10/01/25
Deadline: 20/03/25
Available budget: EUR 122.700.000
In accordance with the call conditions, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria 'Excellence' and 'Impact'. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-TB-01-two-stage: 8 points
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-MALARIA-02-two-stage: 8.5 points
- HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-NTD-03-two-stage: 9 points
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-TB-01-two-stage | HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-MALARIA-02-two-stage | HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-NTD-03-two-stage | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 8 | 27 | 18 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 6 | 9 | 12 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 111.343.463,11 € | 84.744.823,5 € | 175.977.587,13 € |
Summary of observer report:
The evaluations were in the estimation of both observers impartial, fair and equitable. No issues of confidentiality were seen to arise.
This was, in particular, enabled by a careful selection of experts and recorders as well as ensuring that any experts or recorders with a COI were excluded from the discussions of the proposal in question. The use of the SEP platform for all aspects of the reports (IER, CR and QC) also reinforced the confidentiality of the evaluation.
No issues of non-conformity were observed and the evaluation followed all the applicable rules. The eligibility of proposals was determined by the Unit prior to the assignment of experts to proposals. Any issues of proposals being not being “in scope” were discussed by the experts during the consensus meetings.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact [email protected]
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Unlike in first stage proposals, the budget table included in second stage proposals should indicate the total costs of the project and not only the contribution requested from Global Health EDCTP3 Joint Undertaking. You should therefore include in your costs (in each cost category and in the total costs) the amounts that are covered by contributions from contributing partners. Please also specify clearly and separately in your proposal the amounts covered by contributing partners for each contributing partner involved. If such amounts are not provided for the project as a whole but only a specific work package/activities, please indicate it too.
In the explanation of resources allocation, please keep in mind that the evaluation of “Quality and efficiency of the implementation” will be based on the following award criteria:
- Quality and effectiveness of the work plan, assessment of risks, and appropriateness of the effort assigned to work packages, and the resources overall.
- Capacity and role of each participant, and the extent to which the consortium as a whole brings together the necessary expertise
Join the networking platform and find the right partners and co-funders to maximise the chances of your proposal at the second stage. Discover more and register.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
Call HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-two-stage_stage1 has closed on the 20/03/2025.
53 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
• HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-TB-01-two-stage: 8 proposals
• HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-MALARIA-02-two-stage: 27 proposals
• HORIZON-JU-GH-EDCTP3-2025-01-NTD-03-two-stage: 18 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in July 2025.