Pre-normative Research On Hydrogen Odorisation: Enhancing Safety And Detection Along The Hydrogen Value Chain
HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02
- Programme
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Open (31094502)
- Opening Date
- February 10, 2026
- Deadline
- April 15, 2026
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €105,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 1
- Keywords
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026Hydrogen
Description
Expected Outcome:
In the European Union, depending on the Member State, natural gas is odorised, primarily for safety reasons, according to ISO16922[1]. This standard provides guidelines for odorising natural gas and other methane rich gases. However, with a switch to hydrogen, new risk mitigation strategies need to be developed or existing adapted.
With the switch from natural gas to 100 % hydrogen, especially in hard-to-abate industries, safety measures have to be established. Historically, odorisation proved to be an easy applicable safety measure.
Due to different requirements for hydrogen, such as purity and physical properties of the molecule, different odorants have to be used for hydrogen than the ones currently used for natural gas. Therefore, odorants, that are non-toxic and environmentally benign and that provide sufficient olfactory warning, need to be developed and tested. The olfactometric properties should be similar to what is already known and trigger a similar reaction as to natural gas. Especially with sensitive end-users in mind, possible de-odorisation might be needed as well, if the applied odorant is not tolerated by the end-use applications.
A thorough data analysis based on literature as well as already conducted research, such as for example Ready4H2[2], Hy4heat[3], Met4H2[4], sets the basis for testing new and old odorants. The focus should be on the odorant in hydrogen, for example masking effects, degradation and other technical aspects.
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following outcomes:
- Providing data on different odorants or chemical families of odorants to regulatory bodies to ensure that hydrogen gas grids and appliances meet safety and performance standards throughout the European Union, including the tolerance of materials used that come in touch with odorants (and its degradation products if any);
- Harmonised standards and guidelines to reduce over-conservatism and ensure consistent safety measures;
- Standard methods for odorisation and de-odorisation of hydrogen.
Project results are expected to contribute to the following objectives of the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA:
- By 2030 hydrogen safety is understood and lived holistically and odorisation is one of the applied safety measures;
- By 2030 public awareness of odorised hydrogen is enhanced and the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier widely accepted in the EU, as a target group especially the non-experts.
Scope:
While the goal is to have an entirely decarbonised gas grid by the end of 2030, safety measures are needed when switching to 100 % hydrogen. For a safe operation, pipeline components not only need to be checked for hydrogen tolerance, but also whether they tolerate the odorants themselves. Pre-Normative Research (PNR) and the development of regulations, codes and standards (RCS) require an open communication and knowledge transfer across project boundaries and beyond project terms. Generation of experimental data, collaboration and coordination with international partners and stakeholders are essential to ensure that this goal is achieved in the EU and even worldwide.
The warning scent of an odorant should be detectable at very low concentrations. Therefore gas-air-mixtures in indoor areas should reliably be olfactorily detectable at 20% of the lower flammability limit in air250. The lower flammability of hydrogen is 4%, therefore the odorised hydrogen should be detectable at 0,8% in air. Olfactory tests in laboratory scale should therefore be executed to ensure the desired detectability.
The development and characterisation of new odorants is encouraged but not mandatory. Additional to this data analysis, literature research for hydrogen detection methods shall be provided, assessing general application possibilities to give a full picture of available leak detection methods. The odorants found suitable for testing should be subjected to tests according to DIN EN ISO 13734[5] and the gathered data publicly shared according to FAIR principles. Additionally, the odorant(s) should be thoroughly analysed and characterised including, but not excluding any other analysis, such as the following:
- Chemical characterisation of the odorant molecule (if already known, based on literature) for example by using GC-MS/MS, NMR and elemental analysis for new compound;
- Provide analytical methods to quantify the lowest concentration (ppb/ppt levels) of the odorant/s detectable by olfactory test, as well as methods suitable for controlling fraud in the odorant employed at hydrogen (i.e. using tracing analysis);
- Stability tests of the odorising molecule and characterisation of possible degradation and transformation products while providing tracing methods to quantify the degree of degradation of the odorising molecule by relevant analytical methods;
- Assessment of in-silico toxicity of the odorant/s at different concentrations, and eventually of the transformation products/degradants;
- Absorption/permeation tests for the odorant (including the degradation molecules (differentiation for example via chromatography)) in hydrogen for different polymers (pipes or seals) and examination of possible material alterations ;
- Impact on end users’ system in term of performance or environmental impact (i.e., fuel cell, combustion, chemical use as for fertiliser etc.).
The odorant itself should be tested in a close to real-world environment or conditions (test bed), to ensure it is tolerated by the materials used for example in pipes, compressors, valves and other materials getting in touch.
With regards to safety, proposals should ensure that the odorant and or its degradation molecules do not enhance hydrogen embrittlement, hydrogen permeability through polymers or other ways of hydrogen corrosion or be corrosive themselves. Tests could be performed for example after ASME B31.12[6] or be tackled via modelling / numerical studies.
Due to some sensitive hydrogen appliances, at least a validated strategy for the removal of odorant molecules for sensitive appliances, either with fitting absorbents, adsorbents, membranes, PSA or other, should be demonstrated. The purity of the de-odorised hydrogen should meet the requirements according to ISO 14687[7].
Hydrogen odorisation takes place in specific parts of the transmission and distribution network, usually at feed-in of the gas, but sometimes at compressor and pressure regulator stations. To ensure safety throughout the entire hydrogen supply chain, it's important to study the quality of the hydrogen-odorant mixture, especially how it moves through the pipes of the different networks e.g., transportation or distribution. This involves modelling and simulating how the mixture flows under different pressures and different flow velocities. By doing this, it can be understood how the odorant spreads, including how its concentration changes over time and how much of it is lost at different points in the network.
The expected results, aim to support the definition of regulatory standardisation frameworks. Given the scope of this topic, the involvement of formal standardisation bodies as part of the consortia is encouraged, with the aim of facilitating the uptake of the project results. Furthermore, participation of gas distributors and regulatory institutions, with practical experiences concerning the odorisation of hydrogen, is encouraged.
Proposals should pay special attention to the dissemination of the results and enhance exchanges with relevant stakeholders mentioned above, e.g via annual workshops and by working in synergies with others as follows.
The proposal should complement, built and create synergies with relevant projects. In particular, synergies should be foreseen with the project supported by the European Partnership on Metrology, EURAMET, Met4H2[4], where standards for sulfur-free odorants were developed with support of the hydrogen distribution sector.
Furthermore, proposals should create synergies and collaborate with relevant recent and new developments on regulation, codes and standards including but not only, the project HyQualNet, whose results should be taken into account [9].
For additional elements applicable to all topics please refer to section 2.2.3.2
[1] https://www.iso.org/standard/83835.html
[5] https://www.iso.org/standard/56767.html
[6] https://www.asme.org/codes-standards/find-codes-standards/b31-12-hydrogen-piping-pipelines
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.
Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
Page limit for Innovation Actions: For all Innovation Actions the page limit of the applications are 70 pages.
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Additional eligibility condition: Maximum contribution per topic
For some topics, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, an additional eligibility criterion has been introduced to limit the Clean Hydrogen JU requested contribution mostly for actions performed at high TRL level, including demonstration in real operational environment and with important involvement from industrial stakeholders and/or end users such as public authorities. Such actions are expected to leverage co-funding as commitment from stakeholders. It is of added value that such leverage is shown through the private investment in these specific topics. Therefore, proposals requesting contributions above the amounts specified per each topic below will not be evaluated
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 5.00 million
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 8.00 million
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 17.00 million
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 8.00 million
Additional eligibility condition: Membership to Hydrogen Europe / Hydrogen Europe Research
For the topics listed below, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, an additional an additional eligibility criterion has been introduced to ensure that one partner in the consortium is a member of either Hydrogen Europe or Hydrogen Europe Research. This concerns topics targeting actions for large-scale demonstrations, flagship projects and strategic research actions, where the industrial and research partners of the Clean Hydrogen JU are considered to play a key role in accelerating the commercialisation of hydrogen technologies by being closely linked to the Clean Hydrogen JU constituency, which could further ensure full alignment with the SRIA of the JU. This approach shall also ensure the continuity of the work performed within projects funded through the H2020 and FP7, by building up on their experience and consolidating the EU value-chain. In the Call 2026 this applies to: development and demonstration of flexible and standardised hydrogen storage systems and demonstration and operation of reversible solid oxide cell systems operation for local grid-connected hydrogen production and utilisation. This will also apply to the Hydrogen Valleys (flagship) topics as they are considered of strategic importance for the European Union ambitions to double the number of Hydrogen Valleys by 2025 as well as to the more recent European Commission’s inspirational target to have at least 50 Hydrogen Valleys under construction or operational by 2030 across the entire EU. For the Hydrogen Valleys topics a large amount of co-investment/co-funding of project participants/beneficiaries including national and regional programmes is expected.
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
STEP (Sovereignty) Seal
For the Hydrogen Valleys topics, as shown below, STEP Seal (so called “Sovereignty Seal” under the STEP Regulation) will be awarded to proposals exceeding all of the evaluation thresholds set out in this Annual Work Programme. The STEP Seal is a label, which aims to increase the visibility of quality projects available for funding and help attract alternative and cumulative funding for quality projects, and simultaneously to provide a potential project pipeline for regional and national programmes.
STEP (Sovereignty) Seal is applicable to the following topics:
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
In addition to the standard provisions, the following specific provisions in the model grant agreement will apply:
1. Lump Sum
This year’s call for proposals will take the form of lump sums as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021- 2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025)[2].
Lump sums will be used across all topics in the Call 2026.
[2] DECISION authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) ls-decision_he_en.pdf (europa.eu)
2. Full capitalised costs for purchases of equipment, infrastructure or other assets purchased specifically for the action
For some topics, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, mostly large-scale demonstrators or flagship projects specific equipment, infrastructure or other assets purchased specifically for the action (or developed as part of the action tasks) can exceptionally be declared as full capitalised costs. This concerns the topics below:
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02
3. Subcontracting
For all topics: an additional obligation regarding subcontracting has been introduced, namely that subcontracted work may only be performed in target countries set out in the call conditions.
The beneficiaries must ensure that the subcontracted work is performed in the countries set out in the call conditions.
The target countries are all Member States of the European Union and all Associated Countries.
4. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), background and results, access rights and rights of use (article 16 and Annex 5 of the Model Grant Agreement (MGA))
An additional information obligation has been introduced for topics including standardisation activities: ‘Beneficiaries must, up to 4 years after the end of the action, inform the granting authority if the results could reasonably be expected to contribute to European or international standards’. These concerns the topics below:
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-03
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
- HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02
Specific conditions
described in the chapter 2.2.3.2 of the Clean Hydrogen JU 2026 Annual Work Programme
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Application form - Part B (HE CleanH2 RIA, IA)
Application form - Part B (HE CleanH2 CSA)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Clean Hydrogen JU - Annual Work Programme 2026 (AWP 2026)
Clean Hydrogen JU - Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA)
Lump Sums Guidance
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Comprehensive information on lump sum funding in Horizon Europe
FAQ on Call HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2026-2027 – 15. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Decision authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Frequently Asked Questions About Pre-normative Research On Hydrogen Odorisation: Enhancing Safety And Detection Along The Hydrogen Value Chain
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
FAQ document from call HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026
Latest Updates
Topic Update:
- In section "Get support" the FAQ document has been updated
Topic Update: Explanation of Costs in the Lump-Sum "Detailed Budget Table"
If your lump sum budget contains any cost items in cost category C and/or D, please make sure to justify these items in the ‘Any comments’ sheet of the Excel detailed lump sum budget table.
The reason is that we simplified the proposal template, removing this information from Part B and bringing it closer to the relevant budget items.
Specifically, you must include justification in the ‘Any comments’ sheet if you are in any of the following situations:
- If the sum of the costs for ’travel and subsistence’, ‘equipment’, and ‘other goods, works and services’ (i.e. the purchase costs) exceeds 15% of the personnel costs for a participant. If this is the case, justify the most expensive cost item(s) up to the level that the remaining costs are below 15% of personnel costs.
- If other cost categories (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services) are used.
- If in-kind contributions are used (non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties, which must be included as direct costs in the corresponding cost category, e.g. personnel costs or purchase costs for equipment).
Topic Update:
- In section "Get support" the FAQ document has been updated
- Please note that due to a technical issue, some information displayed on the Portal was incorrect for topics HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-01 (TRL) and HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02 (Maximum funding and EU13 text in expected outcomes and scope). The correct information is now reflected, and this notice supersedes the previously displayed information.