Open

Integration Of Control & Monitoring Tools And Strategies For Improved Fuel Cell System Durability & Reliability

HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-01
Programme
HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Open (31094502)
Opening Date
February 10, 2026
Deadline
April 15, 2026
Deadline Model
single-stage
Budget
€105,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€5,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€5,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
1
Keywords
HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-01HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026Hydrogen

Description

Expected Outcome:

The transition to sustainable mobility is accelerating the adoption of hydrogen-based powertrains, integrating fuel cells, batteries, electric motors and power electronics. In particular, fuel cells (low and high temperature) represent a very promising technology for decarbonising various sectors of mobility, including maritime applications, heavy-duty vehicles and aeronautics. However, remaining aspects that hamper the large-scale diffusion of Fuel Cell Systems (FCS) include their limited lifetime and operational reliability. Moreover, higher fuel cost puts even more stringent requirements and emphasis on system efficiency.

To increase the useful life and reliability of FCS, not only improvements in material and designs are required, but also on control, diagnostic, failure prediction and energy management strategies. It is thus key to integrate advanced prognostic and health management strategies into real operating FCS, suitable not only to enable the detection of anomalies, but also the real-time assessment of the current state of health, developing and integrating proper adaptive recovery strategies to mitigate FCS components’ deterioration. These considerations are generally valid for different technologies (PEMFC, SOFC…), which need to be optimally managed: all the components, both in the stack and Balance of Plant (BoP), should be continuously monitored to maximise the FCS lifetime, reliability as well as efficiency.

Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:

  • Improvements of control and energy management that enable increased lifetime and operational reliability at system level, while retaining high system efficiency;
  • Providing new product ideas and solutions addressing monitoring and diagnostics of FCS, including hardware and software;
  • Enhanced durability and reliability of fuel cell systems, including Balance-of-Plant (BoP) components, through predictive maintenance and operational optimisation;
  • Development of specific hardware and software platforms, with modular and adaptable architecture enabling application across multiple FCS technologies, to implement diagnostic methodologies for identifying technology-related issues;
  • Developing a European open-source platform for sharing data, simulation models, and strategies for control and diagnostics of different FCS technologies (PEMFC, SOFC…) in maritime transport, heavy-duty vehicles, and aviation;
  • Building confidence in FC technology for all of the mobility applications, thus accelerating the market uptake;
  • Supporting manufacturers, researchers, system integrators, and policymakers and promote technological sovereignty, industrial innovation, and decarbonisation in Europe.

Project results are expected to contribute to the following objectives and KPIs of the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA:

  • Reduction of FCS OPEX through predictive maintenance and improved fault detection coupled with fault mitigation;
  • Improvement in dynamic operation and efficiency of the FCS, with high durability and reliability, especially when operating dynamically following an established load profile (representative of the application considered);
  • Development of tools and methods for monitoring, diagnostics and control of fuel cell systems;
  • Increase in FCS durability with regards to the established KPI targets (depending on the selected application) for the End-of-Life (30,000 hours for heavy duty vehicles, 80,000/100,000 hours for marine applications or 50,000 hours for aeronautics);
  • Increase in Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) of critical components and FCS;
  • Increase in lifetime of the fuel cell stack or Balance-of-Plant (BoP) components by 15%, directly attributable to the implementation of predictive maintenance and anomaly mitigation strategies, supported by diagnostic tools capable of identifying and isolating at least 95% of degradation mechanisms and malfunctions under representative operating conditions;
  • Contribute to increased deployment and adoption of fuel cell technologies by demonstrating long-term system robustness;
  • Enable cross-sectoral applicability of solutions across different fuel cell technologies (e.g., PEMFC, SOFC) and fuel types.

Scope:

The scope of this topic is on the development, integration and validation of robust online monitoring and control algorithms for FCS, targeting prediction and mitigation of degradation, faults and failures throughout the system lifetime. Focus shall be on Balance of Plant (BoP) components rather than fuel cell stack. Activities should combine experimental testing, digital modelling and may use AI-based techniques to develop and validate predictive tools for health management. Proposals should clearly explain how they go beyond the achievements of previous projects (namely Ruby [1] and Giantleap [2]), identifying specific technical or methodological advances.

Proposals should address the following aspects:

  • Develop innovative control, monitoring and diagnostic strategies to enhance FCS durability and reliability, leveraging predictive tools;
  • Contribute to the development of standardised protocols for State of Health (SoH) diagnostics and components interoperability in FCS;
  • Integrate developed strategies in an open framework, with adaptable hardware/software platforms as core systems for diagnostics and prognostics, adaptable to different types of FCs and other components of the powertrain (i.e., battery, motors, etc.)
  • Identify and quantify how BoP components influence FCS durability and reliability, and integrate measures to mitigate degradation and FCS fault and failures;
  • Improve the FCS reliability (e.g. increasing Mean Time Between Failures, MTBF) through approaches such as predictive maintenance and condition monitoring applied to key components, using additional (e.g. vibration) or standard (e.g., current/voltage, temperature measurements) or virtual sensors (e.g., estimation of local compositions/conditions);
  • Use of artificial intelligence and data-driven methods is encouraged, especially when combined with physics-based modelling. Physical modelling can be used both to develop real-time diagnostic/prognostic strategies and to implement reference models that justify the adoption of specific diagnostic/prognostic strategies;
  • As far as possible, all tools and methodologies developed should be made available through open data infrastructure, using common/open data formats and providing interfaces for data access and visualisation.
  • Regardless of the type of diagnostic/prognostic algorithm developed (model-based or data-driven), these should be validated using experimental data obtained from real demonstrators. As in previously funded projects such as Helenus [3], experimental data could be obtained from small-scale components (down to low power levels, around 5–25 kW), which may be subjected to specific duty cycles and stress tests (corresponding to at least 1000 hours of accelerated aging tests, run in a laboratory environment or in real vehicles).
  • Development of two power system demonstrators integrating FCS, software/hardware for diagnostic/prognostic functionalities and power electronics. Each demonstrator should be based on a relevant FC technology (e.g., one based on a PEMFC and the other on a SOFC system, with single or multiple stacks), with a power output representative of at least 100 kW and taking into account environmental and duty cycle constraints coming from potential OEMs involved. If aging and malfunction models are available (validated on real components of a specific FCS technology), one demonstrator could be replaced by a Hardware-in-the-Loop (HiL) system. In this case, diagnostic/prognostic methodologies should be run on a dedicated real-time target (the same used to monitor the real application);
  • Demonstration of the versatility of the methodologies for different fuel cell technologies and with different fuels (when applicable); The demonstrators should be tested under representative duty cycles and operating conditions, providing sufficient evidence to support the achievement of TRL6.
  • Creation of an open-access, anonymised datalake, integrating both experimental and high-fidelity simulated datasets (e.g., from digital twins), organised with open standards and anonymised metadata, to enable reproducible research, AI-based diagnostics training, and broad industrial adoption.

Projects should build on the results obtained in previous projects funded in this area of research, such as Ruby[1], GiantLeap[2], Helenus[3] or Virtual-FCS[4], developing and testing (on real systems) innovative methodologies that can be adapted to different FCS technologies.

Furthermore, depending on the application addressed, synergies with the relevant partnerships such be explored, e.g EU-Rail JU (rail), 2ZERO Partnership (road) or Zero Emission Waterborne Transport Partnership (waterborne).

For activities developing test protocols and procedures for the performance and durability assessment of fuel cell components proposals should foresee a collaboration mechanism with JRC[5] (see section 2.2.4.3 "Collaboration with JRC"), in order to support EU-wide harmonisation. Test activities should adopt the already published EU harmonised testing protocols[6] to benchmark performance and quantify progress at programme level.

For additional elements applicable to all topics please refer to section 2.2.3.2

Activities are expected to start at TRL 4 and achieve TRL 6 by the end of the project - see General Annex B.

The JU estimates that an EU contribution of maximum EUR 4.00 million would allow these outcomes to be addressed appropriately.

Technology Readiness Level - Technology readiness level expected from completed projects

Activities are expected to start at TRL 4 and achieve TRL 6 by the end of the project - see General Annex B.

[1] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/875047

[2] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/700101

[3] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101056784

[4] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/875087

[5] https://www.clean-hydrogen.europa.eu/knowledge-management/collaboration-jrc-0_en

[6] https://www.clean-hydrogen.europa.eu/knowledge-management/collaboration-jrc-0/clean-hydrogen-ju-jrc-deliverables_en

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout

described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.

Page limit for Innovation Actions: For all Innovation Actions the page limit of the applications are 70 pages.

2. Eligible Countries

described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

3. Other Eligible Conditions

described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.

Additional eligibility condition: Maximum contribution per topic

For some topics, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, an additional eligibility criterion has been introduced to limit the Clean Hydrogen JU requested contribution mostly for actions performed at high TRL level, including demonstration in real operational environment and with important involvement from industrial stakeholders and/or end users such as public authorities. Such actions are expected to leverage co-funding as commitment from stakeholders. It is of added value that such leverage is shown through the private investment in these specific topics. Therefore, proposals requesting contributions above the amounts specified per each topic below will not be evaluated

  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 5.00 million
  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 8.00 million
  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 17.00 million
  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 8.00 million

Additional eligibility condition: Membership to Hydrogen Europe / Hydrogen Europe Research

For the topics listed below, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, an additional an additional eligibility criterion has been introduced to ensure that one partner in the consortium is a member of either Hydrogen Europe or Hydrogen Europe Research. This concerns topics targeting actions for large-scale demonstrations, flagship projects and strategic research actions, where the industrial and research partners of the Clean Hydrogen JU are considered to play a key role in accelerating the commercialisation of hydrogen technologies by being closely linked to the Clean Hydrogen JU constituency, which could further ensure full alignment with the SRIA of the JU. This approach shall also ensure the continuity of the work performed within projects funded through the H2020 and FP7, by building up on their experience and consolidating the EU value-chain. In the Call 2026 this applies to: development and demonstration of flexible and standardised hydrogen storage systems and demonstration and operation of reversible solid oxide cell systems operation for local grid-connected hydrogen production and utilisation. This will also apply to the Hydrogen Valleys (flagship) topics as they are considered of strategic importance for the European Union ambitions to double the number of Hydrogen Valleys by 2025 as well as to the more recent European Commission’s inspirational target to have at least 50 Hydrogen Valleys under construction or operational by 2030 across the entire EU. For the Hydrogen Valleys topics a large amount of co-investment/co-funding of project participants/beneficiaries including national and regional programmes is expected.

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02
  3. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
  4. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion

described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.

5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds

are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.

5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes

are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.

5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement

described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.

STEP (Sovereignty) Seal

For the Hydrogen Valleys topics, as shown below, STEP Seal (so called “Sovereignty Seal” under the STEP Regulation) will be awarded to proposals exceeding all of the evaluation thresholds set out in this Annual Work Programme. The STEP Seal is a label, which aims to increase the visibility of quality projects available for funding and help attract alternative and cumulative funding for quality projects, and simultaneously to provide a potential project pipeline for regional and national programmes.

STEP (Sovereignty) Seal is applicable to the following topics:

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants

Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].

described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.

In addition to the standard provisions, the following specific provisions in the model grant agreement will apply:

1. Lump Sum

This year’s call for proposals will take the form of lump sums as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021- 2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025)[2].

Lump sums will be used across all topics in the Call 2026.

[2] DECISION authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) ls-decision_he_en.pdf (europa.eu)



2. Full capitalised costs for purchases of equipment, infrastructure or other assets purchased specifically for the action

For some topics, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, mostly large-scale demonstrators or flagship projects specific equipment, infrastructure or other assets purchased specifically for the action (or developed as part of the action tasks) can exceptionally be declared as full capitalised costs. This concerns the topics below:

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02
  3. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
  4. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02



3. Subcontracting

For all topics: an additional obligation regarding subcontracting has been introduced, namely that subcontracted work may only be performed in target countries set out in the call conditions.

The beneficiaries must ensure that the subcontracted work is performed in the countries set out in the call conditions.

The target countries are all Member States of the European Union and all Associated Countries.



4. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), background and results, access rights and rights of use (article 16 and Annex 5 of the Model Grant Agreement (MGA))

An additional information obligation has been introduced for topics including standardisation activities: ‘Beneficiaries must, up to 4 years after the end of the action, inform the granting authority if the results could reasonably be expected to contribute to European or international standards’. These concerns the topics below:

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-03
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
  3. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02

Specific conditions

described in the chapter 2.2.3.2 of the Clean Hydrogen JU 2026 Annual Work Programme

Frequently Asked Questions About Integration Of Control & Monitoring Tools And Strategies For Improved Fuel Cell System Durability & Reliability

HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026 (2021 - 2027).
Per-award amount: €5,000,000. Total programme budget: €105,000,000. Expected awards: 1.
Deadline: April 15, 2026. Deadline model: single-stage.
Eligible organisation types (inferred): SMEs, Research organisations.
Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout described in Annex A  and  Annex E  of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes. Proposal page limits and layout:  described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
Legal and financial set-up of the grants Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf ]].
Such actions are expected to leverage co-funding as commitment from stakeholders.
You can contact the organisers at [email protected].

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

FAQ document from call HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026

Latest Updates

Last Changed: February 26, 2026

Topic Update:

Last Changed: February 16, 2026

Topic Update: Explanation of Costs in the Lump-Sum "Detailed Budget Table"

If your lump sum budget contains any cost items in cost category C and/or D, please make sure to justify these items in the ‘Any comments’ sheet of the Excel detailed lump sum budget table.

The reason is that we simplified the proposal template, removing this information from Part B and bringing it closer to the relevant budget items.

Specifically, you must include justification in the ‘Any comments’ sheet if you are in any of the following situations:

  • If the sum of the costs for ’travel and subsistence’, ‘equipment’, and ‘other goods, works and services’ (i.e. the purchase costs) exceeds 15% of the personnel costs for a participant. If this is the case, justify the most expensive cost item(s) up to the level that the remaining costs are below 15% of personnel costs.
  • If other cost categories (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services) are used.
  • If in-kind contributions are used (non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties, which must be included as direct costs in the corresponding cost category, e.g. personnel costs or purchase costs for equipment).
Last Changed: February 10, 2026
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-06, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-04, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-04, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-05, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-04
Last Changed: February 4, 2026

Topic Update:

  • In section "Get support" the FAQ document has been updated
  • Please note that due to a technical issue, some information displayed on the Portal was incorrect for topics HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-01 (TRL) and HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02 (Maximum funding and EU13 text in expected outcomes and scope). The correct information is now reflected, and this notice supersedes the previously displayed information.
Grantalist - HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-01 - Integration Of Control & Monitoring Tools And Strategies ... | Grantalist