Open

Demonstrating In-line Inspection (ILI) To Monitor Cracks Assuring Compatibility For Operation With Hydrogen In New And Re-purposed Offshore Natural Gas Pipelines

HORIZON JU Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-02
Programme
HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Open (31094502)
Opening Date
February 10, 2026
Deadline
April 15, 2026
Deadline Model
single-stage
Budget
€105,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€5,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€5,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
1
Keywords
HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-02HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026Hydrogen

Description

Expected Outcome:

Current existing natural gas grids are expected to form a substantial part of the future hydrogen transport and distribution system. Current industry initiatives such as the European Hydrogen Backbone Initiative of major TSOs and Ready4H2[1] of the European DSOs is showcasing how this could progress.

While the work to assure the integrity of the pipelines and components in the grid have progressed in previous projects and activities, the main focus has been on onshore infrastructure. Offshore pipelines have specific design rules and different operating conditions and cannot be excavated for maintenance or service purposes in the same manner as onshore pipes. This means that existing infrastructure should maintain longer, without service or exchange of segments. The consequences of fatigue and cracks could endanger the complete business case of the pipeline. Similarly, it is very expensive to retrieve inspections tools if they get stuck and this situation should be avoided by design and by the way of operating and handling the tool. Also, the offshore pipelines have a larger diameter and are operated under higher pressure. Although, it is in the common interest of both onshore and offshore transport grid operators to have In-line Inspection tools that can operate in hydrogen pipelines, higher standards apply for the offshore use case. It has been observed that the most critical points in offshore pipeline integrity are the circumferential welds and seam welds. Therefore, their accurate detection is a key factor in advancing research on the repurposing of gas pipelines for hydrogen transport.

The integrity of offshore pipelines for hydrogen transport cannot currently be guaranteed due to hydrogen's detrimental effect on fracture toughness, ductility as well as the increase of fatigue crack growth rate, especially in regard to stress concentration areas and required performance of ILI-tools are not fully established.

The project results are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:

  • Safe operation of repurposed and new offshore pipelines with hydrogen;
  • Maintain European technology leadership in ILI-systems;
  • Improve ILI efficiency in stress concentration areas, such as welds and crack like defects;
  • Extend the lifetime and reduce costs of pipeline operation (also onshore);
  • Support the progress of standardisation of gas grid operation and maintenance.

Project results are expected to contribute to the objectives of the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA.

Scope:

The scope of this topic is to demonstrate In-Line Inspection (ILI) tools to qualify existing natural gas pipelines for hydrogen service and to operate in future offshore hydrogen pipelines (new or re-purposed) by validating that the tool is suitable for detecting crack-like defects, especially in stress concentration areas.

Proposals should consider and build on relevant existing work in this area and results from projects related to hydrogen integrity of high-pressure pipelines, ILI-systems and sensor development, such as from Pipeline Operator Forum (POF), European Pipeline Research Group (EPRG), Pipeline Research Conference International (PRCI) and including projects funded by the Clean Hydrogen JU such as HIGGS[2], SHIMMER[3], PilgrHYm[4], etc. and also relevant national projects on the topic, such as TransHyDe[5]. Successful projects are also expected to review the state of the art during their implementation and to identify additional synergies with these and other ongoing relevant projects.

Proposals should develop acceptance criteria for defects, considering the type and size of defects, loading conditions and hydrogen environment. This will be used to prove that inspection methods have sufficient probability of detection and sizing accuracy to ensure the integrity and to determine acceptance criteria for the inspection. Proposals should demonstrate the ability to detect or monitor crack-type defects with satisfactory resolution and detection probability through In-line Inspection (ILI) in offshore high-pressure pipelines, as well as safe and reliable operation of In-Line Inspection tools reaching TRL 6 or higher.

Validation consists of demonstration of the increased performance of the ILI-tools by conducting test-runs in high pressure pipelines.

The validation should be conducted in a hydrogen environment but may take place onshore. Detection results, modus operandi and the in-line inspection device, as such, should be prepared and as far as possible qualified to operate in the hydrogen conditions of the future offshore pipelines, while the dimensions of the tool may be different. The development should consider the securement of the needed material integrity and safety of operation, while also considering the costs of the tool and inspections of the relevant stakeholders. In order to be able to fulfil this scope, proposals should include at least one In-Line-Inspection tool provider and one gas transport grid operator.

The following aspects are to be addressed in the scope of the project:

  • Determine acceptance criteria for defects including critical flaw characteristics and sizes. This will set the required detection sensitivity for the in-line inspection method and device differentiate between categorising the effectiveness in seam welds, girth welds and pipe body according to the wall thickness. However, it should be the minimum ambition that the tool can detect internal surface-breaking circumferential flaws and surface defects not larger than 3×20 mm in the pipeline. The minimum acceptable performance with respect to axially oriented cracks and crack-like defects are:
    • Minimum depth at a Probability of Detection (POD) = 90% of a crack of a length of 25 mm: 1 mm or 10% of the wall thickness, whichever value is greater and a minimum crack opening: < 0.1 mm
    • Depth sizing accuracy at 90% certainty: ± 0.5 mm or 5% of the wall thickness, whichever value is greater and a length sizing accuracy at 90% certainty: ± 5 mm
    • Orientation limits for detectability: ± 10°
  • Determine required conditions for the tool and its operation:
    • The tool should have long term hydrogen compatibility/stability and consider the operational condition (acceleration, mechanical impact, etc.) of the future offshore hydrogen pipelines. One may consider an increased exchange rate of components by design, in a deliberate trade-off between performance and minimisation of costs, considering tool preparation for inspection and all required maintenance on the tool in preparation of a tool run.
    • The tool should be able to negotiate at least 1,5D 90° bends, can collapse and pass bore restriction to 75% of the inside diameter, can pass 1:1 offtakes without pig bars and generally have a low tool drag and friction.
    • Furter criteria such as: Low cost by design, be easy to handle and have low risk of failure, should also be considered
  • Develop and test ILI-tools to the specifications defined;
  • Define guidelines and protocols for the execution, including launch and receive, of in-line-inspections for qualifying existing offshore pipeline and for maintaining pipelines with hydrogen, including velocity control of the ILI tool. Pipeline cleanliness level and cleaning pigging launch protocol between crack detection pigs. Combining other methodologies such as MFL- A/C;
  • Identify and provide suggestions for amendments of existing RCS for the secure monitoring of offshore high-pressure grids;
  • Validate the reliable operation of the ILI tool according to defined specification, guidelines and protocols under real conditions to qualify the design at TRL 6. It is assumed that validation in hydrogen environment and in high pressure pipelines between NPS 16”/DN 400 and NPS 32”/DN 800 are sufficient with controllable pressure and flow conditions to adapt to requirements for testing.

For additional elements applicable to all topics please refer to section 2.2.3.2

Activities are expected to start at TRL 4 and achieve TRL 6 by the end of the project - see General Annex B.

The JU estimates that an EU contribution of maximum EUR 3.50 million would allow these outcomes to be addressed appropriately.

Technology Readiness Level - Technology readiness level expected from completed projects

Activities are expected to start at TRL 4 and achieve TRL 6 by the end of the project - see General Annex B.

[1] https://www.ready4h2.com/

[2] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/875091

[3] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101111888

[4] https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/101137592

[5] https://www.get-h2.de/en/geth2-transhyde/

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout

described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.

Page limit for Innovation Actions: For all Innovation Actions the page limit of the applications are 70 pages.

2. Eligible Countries

described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

3. Other Eligible Conditions

described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.

Additional eligibility condition: Maximum contribution per topic

For some topics, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, an additional eligibility criterion has been introduced to limit the Clean Hydrogen JU requested contribution mostly for actions performed at high TRL level, including demonstration in real operational environment and with important involvement from industrial stakeholders and/or end users such as public authorities. Such actions are expected to leverage co-funding as commitment from stakeholders. It is of added value that such leverage is shown through the private investment in these specific topics. Therefore, proposals requesting contributions above the amounts specified per each topic below will not be evaluated

  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 5.00 million
  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 8.00 million
  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 17.00 million
  • HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02: The maximum Clean Hydrogen JU contribution that may be requested is EUR 8.00 million

Additional eligibility condition: Membership to Hydrogen Europe / Hydrogen Europe Research

For the topics listed below, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, an additional an additional eligibility criterion has been introduced to ensure that one partner in the consortium is a member of either Hydrogen Europe or Hydrogen Europe Research. This concerns topics targeting actions for large-scale demonstrations, flagship projects and strategic research actions, where the industrial and research partners of the Clean Hydrogen JU are considered to play a key role in accelerating the commercialisation of hydrogen technologies by being closely linked to the Clean Hydrogen JU constituency, which could further ensure full alignment with the SRIA of the JU. This approach shall also ensure the continuity of the work performed within projects funded through the H2020 and FP7, by building up on their experience and consolidating the EU value-chain. In the Call 2026 this applies to: development and demonstration of flexible and standardised hydrogen storage systems and demonstration and operation of reversible solid oxide cell systems operation for local grid-connected hydrogen production and utilisation. This will also apply to the Hydrogen Valleys (flagship) topics as they are considered of strategic importance for the European Union ambitions to double the number of Hydrogen Valleys by 2025 as well as to the more recent European Commission’s inspirational target to have at least 50 Hydrogen Valleys under construction or operational by 2030 across the entire EU. For the Hydrogen Valleys topics a large amount of co-investment/co-funding of project participants/beneficiaries including national and regional programmes is expected.

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02
  3. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
  4. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion

described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.

5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds

are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.

5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes

are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.

5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement

described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.

STEP (Sovereignty) Seal

For the Hydrogen Valleys topics, as shown below, STEP Seal (so called “Sovereignty Seal” under the STEP Regulation) will be awarded to proposals exceeding all of the evaluation thresholds set out in this Annual Work Programme. The STEP Seal is a label, which aims to increase the visibility of quality projects available for funding and help attract alternative and cumulative funding for quality projects, and simultaneously to provide a potential project pipeline for regional and national programmes.

STEP (Sovereignty) Seal is applicable to the following topics:

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants

Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].

described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.

In addition to the standard provisions, the following specific provisions in the model grant agreement will apply:

1. Lump Sum

This year’s call for proposals will take the form of lump sums as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021- 2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025)[2].

Lump sums will be used across all topics in the Call 2026.

[2] DECISION authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) ls-decision_he_en.pdf (europa.eu)



2. Full capitalised costs for purchases of equipment, infrastructure or other assets purchased specifically for the action

For some topics, in line with the Clean Hydrogen JU SRIA, mostly large-scale demonstrators or flagship projects specific equipment, infrastructure or other assets purchased specifically for the action (or developed as part of the action tasks) can exceptionally be declared as full capitalised costs. This concerns the topics below:

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02
  3. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01
  4. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02



3. Subcontracting

For all topics: an additional obligation regarding subcontracting has been introduced, namely that subcontracted work may only be performed in target countries set out in the call conditions.

The beneficiaries must ensure that the subcontracted work is performed in the countries set out in the call conditions.

The target countries are all Member States of the European Union and all Associated Countries.



4. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), background and results, access rights and rights of use (article 16 and Annex 5 of the Model Grant Agreement (MGA))

An additional information obligation has been introduced for topics including standardisation activities: ‘Beneficiaries must, up to 4 years after the end of the action, inform the granting authority if the results could reasonably be expected to contribute to European or international standards’. These concerns the topics below:

  1. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-03
  2. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03
  3. HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02

Specific conditions

described in the chapter 2.2.3.2 of the Clean Hydrogen JU 2026 Annual Work Programme

Frequently Asked Questions About Demonstrating In-line Inspection (ILI) To Monitor Cracks Assuring Compatibility For Operation With Hydrogen In New And Re-purposed Offshore Natural Gas Pipelines

HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026 (2021 - 2027).
Per-award amount: €5,000,000. Total programme budget: €105,000,000. Expected awards: 1.
Deadline: April 15, 2026. Deadline model: single-stage.
Eligible organisation types (inferred): SMEs, Research organisations.
Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout described in Annex A &#xa0;and&#xa0; Annex E &#xa0;of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes. Proposal page limits and layout: &#xa0;described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.
Legal and financial set-up of the grants Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025) [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf ]].
Such actions are expected to leverage co-funding as commitment from stakeholders.
You can contact the organisers at [email protected].

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

FAQ document from call HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026

Latest Updates

Last Changed: February 26, 2026

Topic Update:

Last Changed: February 16, 2026

Topic Update: Explanation of Costs in the Lump-Sum "Detailed Budget Table"

If your lump sum budget contains any cost items in cost category C and/or D, please make sure to justify these items in the ‘Any comments’ sheet of the Excel detailed lump sum budget table.

The reason is that we simplified the proposal template, removing this information from Part B and bringing it closer to the relevant budget items.

Specifically, you must include justification in the ‘Any comments’ sheet if you are in any of the following situations:

  • If the sum of the costs for ’travel and subsistence’, ‘equipment’, and ‘other goods, works and services’ (i.e. the purchase costs) exceeds 15% of the personnel costs for a participant. If this is the case, justify the most expensive cost item(s) up to the level that the remaining costs are below 15% of personnel costs.
  • If other cost categories (e.g. internally invoiced goods and services) are used.
  • If in-kind contributions are used (non-financial resources made available free of charge by third parties, which must be included as direct costs in the corresponding cost category, e.g. personnel costs or purchase costs for equipment).
Last Changed: February 10, 2026
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-06, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-04, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-04, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-03-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-05-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-03, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-02, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-04-01, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-05, HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-04
Last Changed: February 4, 2026

Topic Update:

  • In section "Get support" the FAQ document has been updated
  • Please note that due to a technical issue, some information displayed on the Portal was incorrect for topics HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-01-01 (TRL) and HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-06-02 (Maximum funding and EU13 text in expected outcomes and scope). The correct information is now reflected, and this notice supersedes the previously displayed information.
Grantalist - HORIZON-JU-CLEANH2-2026-02-02 - Demonstrating In-line Inspection (ILI) To Monitor Cracks ... | Grantalist