Access to health and care services for people in vulnerable situations
HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage
- Programme
- Ensuring access to innovative, sustainable and high-quality health care (Two stage - 2024)
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- March 30, 2023
- Deadline
- September 19, 2023
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €30,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €4,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €6,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 5
- Keywords
- HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stageHORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-two-stageChild healthDemographyElderlyEmpowermentEquityGender in health sciencesGlobal healthHealth behaviourHealth careHealth dataHealth educationHealth inequalitiesHealth literacyHealth outcomesHealth policiesHealth services, health care researchHealthcare systemIntegrated carePopulation dynamics, aging, health and societyPoverty related diseasesPublic healthSocial structure, inequalities, social mobility, interethnic relationsSocioeconomic stressors
Description
This topic aims at supporting activities that are enabling or contributing to one or several expected impacts of destination 4 “Ensuring access to innovative, sustainable and high-quality health care”. To that end, proposals under this topic should aim for delivering results that are directed, tailored towards and contributing to several of the following expected outcomes:
- Decision- and policymakers, service providers, and health and care workers have better availability to and make use of knowledge on barriers to access to health and care services[1] experienced by people in vulnerable situations and at risk of stigma or discrimination (from now on referred to as people in vulnerable situations)[2].
- Decision- and policymakers, providers and health and care workers have access to innovative solutions to promote and improve access to health and care services for people in vulnerable situations.
- Decision- and policymakers and providers have access to reliable quantitative data on health inequalities in access to health and care services for people in vulnerable situations.
- People in vulnerable situations are better equipped in terms of health and digital literacy, knowledge about their rights etc. when it comes to access to health and care services.
- People in vulnerable situations are involved in the design and implementation of research and innovation activities concerning access to health and care services.
Equal and needs-based access to health and care services are important values of the EU, as well as central principles within the Member States (for example 2006 Council Conclusions on Common values and principles in European Union Health Systems, European Pillar of social rights). At the same time, plenty of evidence indicates that there is unmet need for health and care services. Although financial barriers are an important part of the explanation[3], it is also evident that even in countries where co-payment is low or even zero, access to health and care services differs between groups. Certain groups are more at risk of not accessing all the health and care services they need, depending among other factors, on their socio-economic and legal status, age, sex and gender identity, (dis)ability, ethnicity and geographical location.
For example, the life expectancy for the Roma people – the largest ethnic minority in the EU – is on average ten years shorter than the general population. This is because, due to poor socio-economic conditions and ethnic segregation, many Roma people live in enclaves where equal opportunities to services including infrastructure are lacking. Due to these inequalities that are also rooted in antigypsysim[4], Roma people are facing much greater difficulties accessing and receiving standard health and care services including prevention compared to other citizens[5].
There are significant health inequalities between the LGBTIQ community and the population as a whole. One part of the explanation is reluctance to seek health and care services because they have experienced or fear hostile reactions. Trans- and intersex people still struggle to access quality and affordable medication and care, both related to general health services and specific health care relating to transition, such as a lack of relevant medication or surgical procedures[6].
Compared to men, older women have a higher poverty risk also due to lower pay and lower pensions. They face a higher risk to live longer in poorer health, so their overall need for health and especially care services is therefore higher. People living in difficult socio-economic situations, such as homeless people or people at the risk of poverty may experience similar issues. For migrants and refugees, uncertain legal status, fear of public authorities, or language difficulties may cause additional barriers to seeking adequate health and care services.
Whilst factors outside the health and care sector also have an impact on people’s access to health and care services, health and care systems can influence and facilitate access through accessibility, costs, referrals and attitudes.
Another aspect concerns access to data regarding certain groups. Whereas data on access to health and care when it comes to factors related to socio-economic characteristics, geographical barriers, sex, and age is more accessible, data on people in vulnerable situations (often due to the problem of sensitivity of data) is often less accessible, contributing to making the situation of these groups less visible.
Activities under this call should focus on groups that are in vulnerable situations from a social, financial or health perspective, or at risk of discrimination, such as migrants, Roma people, trans and intersex people, specific age and gender groups (that intersects with other aspects of vulnerability, such as elderly women), indigenous people, homeless people, people in poverty or at risk of poverty, people with disabilities or patients with complex conditions. Where relevant, activities should use intersectional approaches to consider, inter alia, socioeconomic factors, geography, citizenship, age, sex and gender identity, and ethnicity.
Next to the above-mentioned, research and innovation activities under this topic should address several of the following:
- Different types of barriers - different barriers to study could be financial, geographic, social, marginalisation and discrimination. When relevant, health and digital literacy aspects should be analysed. The selection of factors should be context specific as groups suffering from access barriers vary a lot across EU countries and at subnational level. The principle of needs-based health and care should be taken into account.
- Access to what? – for example: what part of the health and care system (from prevention, primary care and long-term care to tertiary care, any specific services, e.g. mental care) do different groups have access to? Is integrated care provided for these groups taking into account their particular needs? How much health and care services do different groups access?
- Solutions - What measures are needed to counter inequalities in health and care access and make sure that vulnerable groups access health and care services and that access is based on needs (measures to educate, support and empower vulnerable groups can be included here)? What are the costs, at different levels, to develop these solutions? Piloting of measures could be included. Community-based and/or co-created initiatives and peer-support approaches: what works and how can these be supported, sustained and/or integrated in the wider service landscape.
- Better data – improving access and quality of data will contribute to identify people in vulnerable situations’ health needs and implement targeted measures corresponding to the challenges that each group experiences. The data could for example explore effectiveness of provided care (metrics helping to assess if provided care addresses the root causes of inequalities) or new valid methodologies to identify the unmet health related needs of people in vulnerable situations. Quantitative and qualitative data on inequalities in prevention, prevalence and treatment of different morbidities.
- Cost analyses - The cost of inequalities in access to health and care services: Quantitatively and/or qualitatively measure the negative impact on not taking measures for helping people in vulnerable situations have access to health and care services including prevention.
Proposals are expected to involve the people/groups studied in the design and implementation of the research and innovation activities and where relevant service providers and other stakeholders.
This topic requires the effective contribution of social sciences and humanities (SSH) disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities.
All projects funded under this topic are strongly encouraged to participate in networking and joint activities, as appropriate. Therefore, proposals should include a budget for the attendance to regular joint meetings and may consider covering the costs of any other potential joint activities without the prerequisite to detail concrete joint activities at this stage. The details of these joint activities will be defined during the grant agreement preparation phase.
When relevant, funded actions should build on the work done by the European Joint Action on Health Equity Europe (JAHEE) and the upcoming activities under the EU4Health Programme (Direct grants to international organisations (WHO): supporting Member States in improving access to healthcare and effectiveness of health coverage, taking into account vulnerabilities of specific groups and targeted intervention and access to mental health for people in vulnerable situations).
Also, when relevant, projects should build on, and are encouraged to consider how their proposals can contribute to, the Commission’s LGBTIQ Equality Strategy 2020-2025, the EU Strategy for the rights of persons living with disabilities, EU strategy on the rights of the child the Child Guarantee, the Gender Equality Strategy, the EU Roma Strategic Framework and the EU Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021-2030[7].
Projects are encouraged to coordinate their activities with the planned European Partnership on Transforming Health and Care Systems, the Cancer Mission, the Cancer Inequalities Registry and the EU Non-Communicable Diseases Initiative.
Projects may explore the Health Systems Performance Assessment (HSPA) Report on more effective ways of measuring access to healthcare, published in 2021. The report provides a collection of tools used on the ground to better understand needs of people in vulnerable situations and adapt the health coverage to ensure more effective care.
2021 Country Profiles published in the framework of the State of Health in the EU can be used as a source of basic comparable data on health inequalities.
Applicants invited to the second stage and envisaging to include clinical studies should provide details of their clinical studies in the dedicated annex using the template provided in the submission system. See definition of clinical studies in the introduction to this work programme part.
[1] “Health and care systems” implies a broader notion than “health systems” or “healthcare systems” notably encompassing all parts of health systems and health related parts of social care systems.
[2] Groups of people and/or patients vulnerable from a social, financial, or health perspective, or at risk of discrimination, such as migrants, Roma people, trans and intersex people, specific age and gender groups (that intersects with other aspects of vulnerability, such as elderly women), indigenous people, homeless people, people in poverty or at risk of poverty, people with disabilities or patients with complex conditions.
[3] See for example OECD Health at a glance 2021.
[4] Antigypsyism (a form of racism against Roma people) is a historically rooted structural phenomenon that appears at institutional, social and interpersonal levels.
[5] The EU Roma strategic framework for equality, inclusion and participation sets up the ambitious goal to lessen the life expectancy gap and ensure that by 2030 Roma women and men live 5 years longer. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/eu_roma_strategic_framework_for_equality_inclusion_and_participation_for_2020_-_2030_0.pdf
[6] stateofart_report_en.pdf (europa.eu) The Commission’s Health4LGBTI project concluded that trans and intersex-focused research is needed that addresses health inequalities and healthcare.
[7] (under the European Pillar of Social Rights) Delivering on the European Pillar of Social Rights - Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion - European Commission (europa.eu) Union of equality: Strategy for the rights of persons with disabilities 2021-2030 - Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion - European Commission (europa.eu) https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=23598&langId=en
Destination & Scope
Calls for proposals under this destination are directed towards the Key Strategic Orientation KSO-D ‘Creating a more resilient, inclusive and democratic European society’ of Horizon Europe’s Strategic Plan 2021-2024. Research and innovation supported under this destination should contribute to the impact areas ‘Good health and high-quality accessible health care’ and ‘A resilient EU prepared for emerging threats’, and in particular to the following expected impact, set out in the Strategic Plan for the health cluster: ‘Health care systems provide equal access to innovative, sustainable and high-quality health care thanks to the development and uptake of safe, cost-effective and people-centred solutions, with a focus on population health, health systems resilience, as well as improved evidence-based health policies’. In addition, research and innovation supported under this destination could also contribute to the following impact areas: ‘Climate change mitigation and adaptation’, ‘High quality digital services for all’ and ‘A Competitive and secure data economy’.
Health systems are affected by limitations in sustainability and resilience, challenges which have been reinforced by the COVID-19 crisis that has also revealed inequalities in access to high-quality health care services. Our health systems need to become more effective, efficient, accessible, fiscally and environmentally sustainable, and resilient in order to cope with public health emergencies, to adapt to environmental challenges like climate change and to contribute to social justice and cohesion. Therefore, the transformation and modernisation of our health systems will be one of the biggest challenges in the economic recovery-bound future, but it will also be a time of opportunity for generating evidence, taking advantage of digital and data-driven innovation and developing more flexible and equitable health systems.
Under this destination, research and innovation aims at supporting health care systems in their transformation to ensure fair access to sustainable health care services of high quality for all citizens. Funded activities should support the development of innovative, feasible, implementable, financially sound and scalable solutions in the various dimensions of health care systems (e.g. governance, financing, human and physical resources, health service provision, and patient empowerment). Ultimately, these activities should improve governance and provide decision-makers with new evidence, methods, tools and technologies for uptake into their health care systems and supporting health care professionals and providers and allocating resources according to citizens’ health needs and preferences, while ensuring fiscal and environmental sustainability to assure those needs can be met on the long-term. Funded activities should adopt a patient-centred approach that empowers patients, promotes a culture of dialogue and openness between citizens, patients, caregivers, health care providers and other relevant stakeholders, and unleashes the potential for social innovation.
In this work programme, destination 4 will focus on the following issues:
- Accelerating the development of personalised medicine in the EU and Associated Countries, especially through a public-public cofunded partnership on personalised medicine
- Increasing access to health and care services for patients and citizens, and especially for people in vulnerable situations and at risk of discrimination
- Improving the resilience and mental wellbeing of the health and care workforce, including informal carers
- Enhancing development and uptake of research and innovation in health and care systems, including environmental transformation of the systems and contributions to the European Green Deal.
In view of increasing the impact of EU investments under Horizon Europe, the European Commission welcomes and supports cooperation between EU-funded projects to enable cross-fertilisation and other synergies. This could range from networking to joint activities such as the participation in joint workshops, the exchange of knowledge, the development and adoption of best practices, or joint communication activities. Opportunities for potential synergies exist between projects funded under the same topic but also between other projects funded under another topic, cluster or pillar of Horizon Europe (but also with ongoing projects funded under Horizon 2020). In particular, this could involve projects related to European health research infrastructures (under pillar I of Horizon Europe), the EIC strategic challenges on health and EIT-KIC Health (under pillar III of Horizon Europe), or in areas cutting across the health and other clusters (under pillar II of Horizon Europe). For instance, with cluster 2 “Culture, Creativity and Inclusive Society” such as on health economics and economic models, on cost-effectiveness, fiscal sustainability and accessibility of health care, or on adaptation of public health systems to societal challenges (climate change, environmental degradation, migration, demographic change, emerging epidemics and One Health AMR) thereby contributing to building resilience; with cluster 3 “Civil Security for Society” such as on security of health care infrastructures, incl. digital health infrastructures, health systems preparedness and response to disasters and other emergencies, and quality and safety of medicine (counterfeit and substandard medicine, illicit drugs, One Health AMR); with cluster 4 “Digital, Industry and Space” such as on cybersecurity of (public) health systems, products and infrastructures of digitalised health and care, or on health impact assessment (e.g. related to consumer products, working place innovation); with cluster 5 “Climate, Energy and Mobility”; and cluster 6 “Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment”.
Expected impacts:
Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to ensuring access to innovative, sustainable and high-quality health care, and more specifically to one or several of the following impacts:
- Health and social care services and systems have improved governance mechanisms and are more effective, efficient, accessible, resilient, trusted and sustainable, both fiscally and environmentally. Health promotion and disease prevention will be at their heart, by shifting from hospital-centred to community-based, people-centred and integrated health care structures and successfully embedding technological innovations that meet public health needs, while patient safety and quality of services are increased.
- Health care providers are trained and equipped with the skills and competences suited for the future needs of health care systems that are modernised, digitally transformed and equipped with innovative tools, technologies and digital solutions for health care. They save time and resources by integrating and applying innovative technologies, which better involve patients in their own care, by reorganising workflows and redistributing tasks and responsibilities throughout the health care system, and by monitoring and analysing corresponding health care activities.
- Citizens are supported to play a key role in managing their own health care, informal carers (including unpaid carers) are fully supported (e.g. by preventing overburdening and economic stress) and specific needs of more vulnerable groups are recognised and addressed. They benefit from improved access to health care services, including financial risk protection, timely access to quality essential health care services, including safe, effective, and affordable essential medicines and vaccines.
- Health policy and systems adopt a holistic approach (individuals, communities, organisations, society) for the evaluation of health outcomes and value of public health interventions, the organisation of health care, and decision-making.
The actions resulting from the calls under this destination will also create strong opportunities for synergies with the EU4Health programme and in particular to contribute to the goals under the general objective “protecting people in the Union from serious cross-border threats to health and specific objective 4 “to strengthen health systems, their resilience and resource efficiency”.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
Applicants submitting a proposal under the blind evaluation pilot (see General Annex F) must not disclose their organisation names, acronyms, logos, nor names of personnel in Part B of their first stage application (see General Annex E).
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
In recognition of the opening of the US National Institutes of Health’s programmes to European researchers, any legal entity established in the United States of America is eligible to receive Union funding.
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
This topic is part of the blind evaluation pilot under which first stage proposals will be evaluated blindly.
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
For the second stage, the thresholds for each criterion will be 4 (Excellence), 4 (Impact) and 3 (Implementation). The cumulative threshold will be 12.
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025). [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme.
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form (HE RIA IA Stage 1) - call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA) - call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA and CSA Stage 1)
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Lump Sum MGA v1.0
Information on clinical studies (HE)
Guidance: "Lump sums - what do I need to know?"
Detailed budget table (HE LS)
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 4. Health
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 13. General Annexes
HE Programme Guide
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Funding & Tenders Portal Terms and Conditions
Funding & Tenders Portal Privacy Statement
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Published: 07.12.2022
Deadline: 11.04.2024
Available budget: EUR 30,000,000
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
The results of the evaluation for the topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage are as follows:
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 20
Number of inadmissible proposals: 0
Number of ineligible proposals: 0
Number of above-threshold proposals: 8
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: EUR 50,180,270.85
Number of proposals retained for funding: 4
Number of proposals in the reserve list: 2
Funding threshold: 13.5
Ranking
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14: 3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13: 4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 12: 1
Summary of observers’ report:
Two independent observers were asked to assist the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA) in the evaluation of proposals submitted to 9 single and two-stage calls (covering 14 topics) with deadline on 11 April 2024, which were discussed during 2.5 weeks of consensus meetings. They followed the evaluation in order to assess and report on the implementation of the evaluation procedures, on the conduct and fairness of the evaluation process and on the application of the evaluation criteria. Based on the analysis conducted, the observers give independent advice for improvement of the evaluation process.
The evaluation process was fully transparent. The rules and guidelines to be followed were clearly communicated by documents provided to experts, by online and on-site briefings and by instructions given and, where necessary, repeated by the moderators. This ensured a fair and transparent procedure. The evaluation was conducted in an extremely fair and professional way, thanks to a thorough and meticulous preparation and to the helpful and competent HaDEA staff involved, including the quality checkers and the assistant team.
The lump sum method was used in this evaluation. Despite that the budget tables provided detailed information and that guidance was provided, many experts found it challenging assessing the proposed budgets.
The independent observers were impressed by the high quality of the evaluation, and made some further recommendations, for consideration in setting up the rules for the next framework programme. The most important advice is that a higher weight should be assigned to the Excellence criterion. It has at present a weight of 1/3 of the final score. This should be increased, as scientific excellence is the most important factor that determines the quality of a project. Such a change would be in line with international practices.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Published: 07.12.2022
Deadline: 11.04.2024
Available budget: EUR 30,000,000
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
The results of the evaluation for the topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage are as follows:
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 20
Number of inadmissible proposals: 0
Number of ineligible proposals: 0
Number of above-threshold proposals: 8
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: EUR 50,180,270.85
Number of proposals retained for funding: 4
Number of proposals in the reserve list: 2
Funding threshold: 13.5
Ranking
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14: 3
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13: 4
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 12: 1
Summary of observers’ report:
Two independent observers were asked to assist the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA) in the evaluation of proposals submitted to 9 single and two-stage calls (covering 14 topics) with deadline on 11 April 2024, which were discussed during 2.5 weeks of consensus meetings. They followed the evaluation in order to assess and report on the implementation of the evaluation procedures, on the conduct and fairness of the evaluation process and on the application of the evaluation criteria. Based on the analysis conducted, the observers give independent advice for improvement of the evaluation process.
The evaluation process was fully transparent. The rules and guidelines to be followed were clearly communicated by documents provided to experts, by online and on-site briefings and by instructions given and, where necessary, repeated by the moderators. This ensured a fair and transparent procedure. The evaluation was conducted in an extremely fair and professional way, thanks to a thorough and meticulous preparation and to the helpful and competent HaDEA staff involved, including the quality checkers and the assistant team.
The lump sum method was used in this evaluation. Despite that the budget tables provided detailed information and that guidance was provided, many experts found it challenging assessing the proposed budgets.
The independent observers were impressed by the high quality of the evaluation, and made some further recommendations, for consideration in setting up the rules for the next framework programme. The most important advice is that a higher weight should be assigned to the Excellence criterion. It has at present a weight of 1/3 of the final score. This should be increased, as scientific excellence is the most important factor that determines the quality of a project. Such a change would be in line with international practices.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
Call HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-two-stage has closed on 11 April 2024.
20 proposals have been submitted under topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage.
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in July 2024 at the earliest.
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
- The proposals should address all the individual sub-criteria in each appropriate section of the proposal (Excellence, Impact, Implementation). E.g., the state of the art should be clearly referenced, the methodology and - where relevant – the technical robustness of AI should be clearly described, the pathways to the expected outcomes and impacts, the scale and significance of project’s contributions to the expected outcomes, and all other aspects need to be addressed.
- Please be reminded, as per the topic text, that proposals are expected to involve the people/groups studied in the design and implementation of the research and innovation activities and where relevant service providers and other stakeholders.
- Multidisciplinary and social sciences and humanities (SSH) aspects should be duly considered and integrated in the methodology.
- If your proposal contains clinical studies, please read carefully the definition and guidance on the template ‘Information on clinical studies' published on the call page in the Participant Portal (Information on clinical studies (HE)) and remember to upload the template filled in when submitting your proposal.
- In stage 2 the eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum contribution as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme. To get started, please read lump sum funding and the guide Lump sum funding - what do I need to know, with details on how to complete the Excel workbook. Recommended: Excel 2013 (Windows) / Excel 2016 (Mac OS) or more recent.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of external experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set at 9.0 points for topic HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget of EUR 30 000 000 (and not below 2.5 times the budget).
The results of the evaluation are as follows:
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): 93
Number of inadmissible proposals: 5
Number of ineligible proposals: 3
Number of above-threshold proposals: 20
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: EUR 116 190 167
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
First stage of call HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-two-stage closed on 19 September 2023. 93 proposals were submitted. The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage: 93 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated on 24 January 2024 at the earliest.
First stage of call HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-two-stage closed on 19 September 2023. 93 proposals were submitted. The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-HLTH-2024-CARE-04-04-two-stage: 93 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated on 24 January 2024 at the earliest.