Breeding For Resilience: Enhancing Multi-stress Tolerance In Crops
HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stage
- Programme
- Cluster 6 Call 01 - two stage
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- May 6, 2025
- Deadline
- September 4, 2025
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €10,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 2
- Keywords
- HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stageHORIZON-CL6-2025-01-two-stageAgriculture related to crop production, soil biology and cultivation, applied plant biologyPlant biologyPlant breedingPlant geneticsPlant physiology
Description
In line with the objectives of the European Green Deal, the common agricultural policy, the EU climate policy and the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030, a successful proposal will contribute to the expected impact of this destination by supporting the adaptation of agricultural production to the effects of climate change, increasing biodiversity in agroecosystems, and promoting low-input practices, thereby enhancing the resilience of agricultural systems and safeguarding food security.
Projects are expected to contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:
- deeper knowledge and characterisation of relevant traits for tolerance and resistance to multiple stresses, whether occurring simultaneously or sequentially, are more accessible to researchers and breeders;
- the identification of local varieties with high plasticity to cope with multi-stress conditions is enhanced, along with the development of agro-ecological practices that improve stress tolerance while supporting biodiversity-friendly cropping systems;
- the capacities to evaluate the effects of multiple stresses in crops by researchers and breeders are strengthened;
- information and recommendations on variety performance and practices to cope with multi-stress are available to advisors and farmers.
Crop production faces significant challenges due to climate change and the need to adopt low-input practices, including efficient water use, to reduce the environmental impact while ensuring food security. Issues such as salinity, extreme weather conditions like droughts, waterlogging, high temperatures, and emerging patterns of pests and diseases severely impact crops, resulting in reduced productivity and yield losses. Crop responses to multiple stresses differ from their responses to single stresses. Therefore, attention should be given to enhancing crop tolerance to combinations of multiple abiotic and biotic stresses, thus better reflecting real-life agricultural conditions.
To address these challenges, it is crucial to evaluate local crop varieties, which are often better adapted to specific environmental conditions and stresses. Identifying local varieties with high plasticity enhances crop resilience and agro-biodiversity. Developing agro-ecological practices to improve stress tolerance will further support these efforts, promoting low-input practices and enhancing the overall adaptability of agricultural systems. Additionally, broad-spectrum strategies for improving stress tolerance in crops should be developed. Smart and future-proof breeding programmes need to systematically consider characteristics that enhance crop resilience and adaptation to these demands.
Proposals should:
- provide insight into the range of mechanisms and traits that underpin crop responses to multiple stresses, whether occurring simultaneously or sequentially, guiding the development of varieties and a crop system better equipped to withstand abiotic and biotic stresses, including reduced agricultural inputs;
- increase understanding of the causality between abiotic and biotic stress factors and propose strategies to improve multi-stress tolerance;
- integrate advanced technologies to assist in evaluating GxExM (Genotype x Environment x Management) interactions in the context of multi-stress, combining multiple "omics" data sources, high-throughput phenotyping, computational modelling and artificial intelligence, to evaluate at different levels (e.g. greenhouses, experimental fields, production fields). This integration should assist breeders in developing local varieties optimised for sustainability and climate change adaptation;
- develop location-specific breeding strategies and agroecological practices, incorporating models and artificial intelligence approaches for prediction of cropping systems output, under multiple stress conditions considering climate change scenarios and climate analogues. These strategies should promote agrobiodiversity, soil health, and ecosystem services;
- deliver robust methodologies for benchmarking and communicating the performance of crop varieties when they are challenged by multiple stresses.
Proposals should provide a clear explanation and justification for the selected crop(s) in alignment with the proposal’s objectives and the topic’s expected outcomes, considering as well that activities should be carried out in a range of agronomically relevant pedo-climatic conditions. All farming systems and approaches are in scope. If proposals address organic farming, particular attention should be given to aspects related to organic varieties and organic heterogeneous materials.
Proposals may provide financial support to third parties (FSTP) to, for instance, develop, test and demonstrate tools to evaluate GxExM interactions in the context of multi-stress. A maximum of 20% of the EU funding should be allocated to this purpose. Consortia need to define the selection process of organisations, for which financial support may be granted.
Proposals should ensure coherence and complementarities with ongoing relevant Horizon Europe projects, including the agroecology partnership, and capitalise on existing relevant research findings and tools, included those developed under previous research projects. Collaboration with European research infrastructures such as AnaEE-ERIC, EMPHASIS or other relevant research infrastructures[1] is encouraged.
[1] The catalogue of European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) research infrastructures portfolio can be browsed from ESFRI website https://ri-portfolio.esfri.eu/.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout
Applicants submitting a proposal under the blind evaluation pilot (see General Annex F) must not disclose their organisation names, acronyms, logos nor names of personnel in the proposal abstract and Part B of their first-stage application (see General Annex E).
2. Eligible Countries
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other Eligible Conditions
described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion
described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds
This topic is part of the blind evaluation pilot under which first stage proposals will be evaluated blindly.
are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes
are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement
described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants
Beneficiaries may provide financial support to third parties. The support to third parties can only be provided in the form of grants. The maximum amount to be granted to each third party is EUR 60 000.
described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Application and evaluation forms and model grant agreement (MGA):
Application form templates — the application form specific to this call is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard application form (HE RIA IA Stage 1)
Evaluation form templates — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA and CSA Stage 1)
Guidance
Model Grant Agreements (MGA)
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 9. Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment
HE Main Work Programme 2025 – 14. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
EU Financial Regulation 2024/2509
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Frequently Asked Questions About Breeding For Resilience: Enhancing Multi-stress Tolerance In Crops
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation for call topic HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stage for some proposals, are the following:
-The scope of the topic related to understanding the causality between abiotic and biotic stress factors was not sufficiently addressed.
-The identification of local varieties with high plasticity to cope with multi-stress conditions was not sufficiently demonstrated.
-The state of the art was not sufficiently established.
-The R&I maturity was not always well demonstrated; the starting and ending TRLs were not well defined or not credible.
-Open science practices were not sufficiently addressed.
-The scale and significance of the proposal’s contributions to the expected impacts were not sufficiently quantified.
-Potential barriers that may determine whether the desired outcomes and impacts are achieved were not always well addressed
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
EVALUATION results
In accordance with the General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 2 times the available budget (and not below 1.5 times the budget):
Topic ID | Topic short name | Overall threshold applied |
HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-01-two-stage | Living labs and lighthouses co-creating innovative solutions for forests and freshwater ecosystems restoration | 9 |
HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stage | Breeding for resilience: enhancing multi-stress tolerance in crops | 9 |
HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-two-stage | Substances of concern and emerging pollutants from bio-based industries and products: mapping and replacement | 9 |
HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-CIRCBIO-01-two-stage | Open Topic: Innovative solutions for the sustainable and circular transformation of SMEs | 9 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-CIRCBIO-01-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-01-two-stage | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 56 | 31 | 7 | 31 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 1 | |||
Number of ineligible proposals | 1 | |||
Number of above-threshold proposals | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | 49,386,695.59 € | 19,695,000.00 € | 20,000,000.00 € | 27,995,000.00 € |
Summary of observer report:
“This report presents the observers’ review of the evaluation process for the first-stage proposals submitted under the HORZON-CL6-2025-01-two-stage call. The call included four topics which were HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-01-two-stage, HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stage, HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-CIRCBIO-01-two-stage and HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-two-stage. The report outlines how effectively the procedures worked, how user-friendly the tools and systems were (including IT platforms), how fairly and professionally the evaluation sessions were carried out, and whether all applicable guidelines were followed. The purpose is to provide independent advice that can help enhance future EU funding evaluation practices.
In total, 125 proposals were evaluated across the four topics. The fully remote, online evaluation format proved both efficient and suitable for this phase of the two-stage call. The briefings and supporting documents the experts received were of excellent quality. Consensus discussions in SEP generally proceeded smoothly, supported by features such as the task comment box. All proposals were evaluated strictly in line with European Commission requirements and evaluation standards.
Strict confidentiality protocols were upheld throughout the process. The evaluation adhered closely to all published rules, with consistent emphasis on regulatory compliance at every stage. No breaches or irregularities were identified.
Overall, the process was well-structured, transparent, and fair, and the final scores and rankings were considered an accurate reflection of each proposal’s merit.”
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-two-stage has closed on 04/09/2025.
125 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
- HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-01-two-stage: 32
- HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-BIODIV-02-two-stage: 55
- HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-CIRCBIO-01-two-stage: 31
- HORIZON-CL6-2025-01-ZEROPOLLUTION-01-two-stage: 7
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in December 2025.
Please note that due to a technical issue, during the first days of publication of this call, the topic page did not display the description of the corresponding destination. This problem is now solved. In addition to the information published in the topic page, you can always find a full description of the 7 destinations (Biodiversity and ecosystem services; Fair, healthy and environment-friendly food systems from primary production to consumption; Circular economy and bioeconomy sectors; Clean environment and zero pollution; Land, ocean and water for climate action; Resilient, inclusive, healthy and green rural, coastal and urban communities; Innovative governance, environmental observations and digital solutions in support of the Green Deal) that are relevant for the call in the Work Programme 2025 part for “Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment”. Please select from the work programme the destination relevant to your topic and take into account the description and expected impacts of that destination for the preparation of your proposal.