Thematic networks to compile and share knowledge ready for practice
HORIZON Coordination and Support Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-9
- Programme
- Innovative governance, environmental observations and digital solutions in support of the Green Deal
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- October 16, 2023
- Deadline
- February 27, 2024
- Deadline Model
- single-stage
- Budget
- €4,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €2,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 2
- Keywords
- HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-9HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01Agriculture, Rural Development, FisheriesCommon agricultural policy (CAP)Knowledge transfer
Description
In support of the European Green Deal, the EU climate policy, the common agricultural policy (CAP) and the farm to fork strategy objectives and targets, the successful proposals will focus on knowledge sharing in a language that is easy to understand and targeted to farmers and foresters. They will address the necessity of primary producers for impartial and tailored knowledge on the management choices related to the needs, challenges or opportunities they experience.
They will also speed up innovation and the uptake of results, and will be key to improving sustainability. They will contribute to effective Agriculture Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS[1]), thereby adding value to the knowledge and cost-effectiveness of innovative practices and techniques in and across primary production sectors, food and bioeconomy systems, and lead to more informed and engaged stakeholders and users of project results.
Despite the continued funding of scientific projects, new knowledge, innovative ideas and methods from practice are not sufficiently captured and spread. The research findings are often not integrated into agricultural and forestry practice. Proposals, acting at EU level to remedy this situation, are essential because national and sectoral AKISs are insufficiently connected and organised to fully meet the challenge of intensifying thematic cooperation between researchers, advisors and farmers/foresters. This exchange of knowledge will foster economically viable and sustainable agriculture and forestry and build trust between the main AKIS actors.
Project results are expected to contribute to all of the following outcomes:
- Contribution to the cross-cutting objective of modernising the sector by fostering and sharing knowledge, innovation and digitalisation in agriculture and rural areas, and encouraging their uptake[2] , as well as to the European Green Deal, including climate change, and farm to fork strategy objectives and targets.
- Collection and distribution of easily accessible practice-oriented knowledge on the thematic area chosen, in particular the existing innovative solutions, best practices and research findings that are ready to be put into practice, but not sufficiently known or used by practitioners.
- Maintenance of practical knowledge in the long-term – beyond the project period – in particular by using the main trusted dissemination channels that farmers/foresters most often consult.
- Increased flow of practical information between farmers/foresters in the EU in a geographically balanced way, creating spill-overs and taking account of the differences between territories.
- Greater user acceptance of collected solutions and a more intensive dissemination of existing knowledge, by connecting actors, policies, projects and instruments to speed up innovation and promote the faster and wider co-creation and transposition of innovative solutions into practice.
Proposals should address the following activities:
- Tackle the most urgent farmers’ or foresters' needs by summarising, sharing and presenting – in a language that is easy to understand and is targeted to farmers and foresters – the existing best practices and research findings that are ready to be put into practice, but not sufficiently known or used by practitioners. The specific themes of the networks can be chosen in a 'bottom-up' way on the condition that they contribute to the relevant EU policy objectives, including climate change mitigation or adaptation;
- Compile a comprehensive description of the state of current farming/forestry practices on the chosen theme to explain the added-value of the proposal and the relevance of the theme. Proposals should focus on the cost/benefit aspects of the practices collected and summarised, and clarify how the project avoids duplication with ongoing or completed projects and networks;
- Deliver an extensive range of useful, applicable and appealing end-user material for farmers and foresters. This info should be easy to access and understand, making use of audio-visual material wherever possible, including also materials serving education and training and automatic translation services that allow dissemination beyond language barriers;
- This range of material should feed into the existing dissemination channels most consulted by farmers and foresters in the countries;
- As many “practice abstracts” in the common EIP-AGRI format as possible, as well as other types of materials should be provided to the European Innovation Partnership (EIP-AGRI) 'Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability', as well as to national/regional/local AKIS channels and to the EU-wide interactive knowledge reservoir (HORIZON-CL6-2021-GOVERNANCE-01-24);
- Besides giving the details on the EIP Operational Groups whose involvement is strongly recommended[3], wherever possible and relevant to the chosen theme, provide also details on how further synergies will be built with future EIP Operational Groups and interactive innovation groups operating in the context of the EIP-AGRI;
- Proposals must implement the 'multi-actor approach', with a consortium based on a balanced mix of actors with complementary knowledge clearly activating farmers/foresters, farmers' groups and advisors; and run for a minimum of 3 years;
- In order to better reach and capture knowledge from the targeted farmers/foresters, the networks may organise 'cross-fertilisation' through sub-networks covering, for example, a region, a language or a production system.
[1] AKIS means the organisation and knowledge flows between persons, organisations and institutions who use and produce knowledge for agriculture and interrelated fields (Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation).
[2] Art 5 of the post 2020 CAP regulation.
[3] According to the requirements of the multi-actor approach.
Destination & Scope
Taking advantage of the use, uptake, and deployment of environmental observations as well as digital and data-based green solutions, assessed through the European Green Deal’s ‘do no harm’ principle, is key for innovative governance models and for designing, implementing and monitoring science-based policy. To maximise impacts of R&I on the ground and spark behavioural and socio-economic change, the knowledge and innovation produced throughout the whole cluster should be widely disseminated to and exchanged between the key stakeholders and end users. In particular, the Agricultural Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS) need to be strengthened in line with the 2023-2027 CAP to accelerate the required transformative changes.
Innovating with governance models and supporting policies
Transformative changes such as those required within the European Green Deal are dynamic processes that require appropriate governance. At the same time, to ensure coordination and for collaborative and informed decision-making, governance requires multiple channels and networks that provide readily available and robust data and information from different sources.
R&I activities under this destination aim to both: experiment with new ways to govern the transition process and strengthen the governance, in particular by ensuring i) appropriate and inclusive engagement with stakeholders, e.g. civil society and regional and local actors, ii) environmental observations coverage, and iii) that information and knowledge is made available and accessible. R&I for governance to support the European Green Deal should provide insights into the opportunities to overcome potential institutional barriers such as lock-ins, path dependency, political and cultural inertia, power imbalances and the ways to strengthen the effectiveness and efficiency of regulatory pathways. It should also help create synergies and linkages between different policy instruments and funding opportunities.
Innovative governance supporting the European Green Deal objectives needs to recognise, cope with and promote resilience and inclusiveness in the face of on-going shocks and disruptions across Europe and the world, whether these be climatic, ecological, economic, social, geopolitical or related to agricultural inputs and resources, food, health, bio-based sectors or the wider bioeconomy. The creation of networks with the public (citizen engagement) and researchers, including also through digital technologies, can step up transformation and enhance resilience in different areas, such as food. Critical risk assessment and reduction strategies need to be incorporated, including the diversification of infrastructures, resources and knowledge through more self-sufficiency and autonomy. Innovative governance will: i) support social innovation in the bioeconomy and bio-based systems (e.g. revitalisation of local communities with innovative bio-based business models and social innovation, or with co-creation and trust-building measures for biotechnology and bio-based innovation systems); ii) assess existing and emerging trade-offs of land and biomass; and iii) strengthen the national bioeconomy networks in countries taking part in the Central-Eastern European Initiative for Knowledge-Based Agriculture, Aquaculture and Forestry in the Bioeconomy (BIOEAST Initiative)[1].
The new partnership ‘Agriculture of Data’ will help improve the sustainability performance of agricultural production and strengthen policy monitoring and evaluation capacities through using the full potential of Earth and environmental observation and data technologies. It will address public and private sector interests in a synergetic way. This will be done through responsible R&I delivering data-based green solutions and through establishing governance structures which allow for systemic approaches to capitalising and using data. The partnership for a ‘Climate-neutral, sustainable and productive Blue Economy’ will enable a just and inclusive transition to a climate-neutral, sustainable and productive blue economy providing for a healthy ocean, people’s wellbeing, and a blue economy that is in harmony with nature and whose benefits are distributed fairly.
Deploying and adding value to environmental observations
Data and information obtained through environmental observation is of great value when assessing the state of the planet and is crucial to supporting the European Green Deal and the climate and ecological transitions. Integrating this information from different sources (space-based, airborne including drones, in-situ and citizens observations) with other relevant data and knowledge while ensuring (better) accessible, interoperable or deployable information, provides the information necessary for shaping the direction of policy development in the broad context of Cluster 6A strong link to Copernicus, the European Earth observation and monitoring part of the EU Space programme (in Cluster 4 - Digital, Industry and Space) and the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Earth observation programme, as well as support to the Group on Earth Observation (GEO), its European regional initiative (EuroGEO), the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) and the European Commission initiative DestinationEarth[2], is foreseen for topics on environmental observations under this destination. R&I activities relevant to the ocean, seas and coastal waters will complement and support the UN Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development and the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, the G7 Future of the Seas and Oceans Initiative, the European Global Ocean Observing System (EOOS) and the GOOS 2030 strategy.
Digital and data technologies as key enablers
Digital and data-based innovation, in complementarity with activities supported by Cluster 4 and the Digital Europe Programme, should bring benefits for citizens, businesses, researchers, the environment, society at large and policymakers. The potential of the ongoing digital transformation, and its wider impacts – both positive and negative – need to be better understood and monitored in view of future policy design and implementation, governance, and solution development. The potential for digital and data technologies, including AI-, IoT-, and augmented reality-based solutions, to increase the sustainability and resilience of production and consumption systems, as well as industry and services, in sectors covered by this Cluster will be exploited. This destination will contribute to the development, support and take up of innovative digital and data-based solutions to support communities, economic sectors relevant for this cluster and society at large to achieve sustainability objectives. The focus is on overall sustainable solutions tailored to the needs of end-users and/or the systems. More specifically, R&I activities will contribute to economic circularity by promoting reuse of materials and waste reduction, adding value to existing knowledge and increasing cost-effectiveness, safety and trustworthiness of innovative environmentally-friendly technologies in and across primary production sectors, food systems, bio-based sectors, bioeconomy, and sectors related to the oceans and biodiversity.
It will also increase attention given to precision and collaborative technologies and contribute to the human-centric twin green and digital transitions. This is a key policy objective that is also supported by the cross-cutting objective pursued by the CAP, the EU digital strategy, the European industrial strategy, the circular economy action plan, the SME strategy and the European data strategy.
Strengthening agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS)[3]
Knowledge and advice to all actors relevant to this cluster are key to improving sustainability. For instance, primary producers have a particular need for impartial and tailored advice on sustainable management choices. Agriculture Knowledge and Innovation Systems (AKIS, which are at the heart of the 2023-2027 CAP’s cross-cutting objective, go beyond agriculture, farming and rural activities and cover environment, climate, biodiversity, landscape, bioeconomy, consumers and citizens, i.e. all food and bio-based systems including value chains up to the consumer. R&I actions under this destination will support effective AKIS as a key driver to bridge the gap between science and practice and to enhance co-creation. This will speed up innovation and the take-up of results needed to achieve the European Green Deal objectives and targets.
This includes promoting interactive innovation and co-ownership of results by users as well as strengthening synergies with other EU funds, especially the CAP, boosting the multi-actor approach and setting up structural networking within national/regional/local AKIS. In addition, social innovation also has the potential to achieve the objectives set in this destination, as it strengthens the resilience of communities, increases the relevance, acceptance and uptake of innovation, and helps bring about lasting changes in social practices, therefore acting as a system changer.
Where appropriate, proposals are encouraged to cooperate with the European Commission Knowledge Centre on Earth Observation (KCEO)[4], in order to e.g. disseminate and exploit results.
Expected impact
Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway contributing to innovative governance and sound decision-making on policies for the green transition and more specifically to one or more of the following impacts:
- innovative governance models enabling sustainability and resilience notably to achieve better informed decision-making processes, societal engagement and innovation;
- areas related to the European Green Deal benefit from further deployment and exploitation of environmental observation data, products and “green” solutions;
- a strengthened Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)[5];
- sustainability performance and competitiveness in the areas covered by Cluster 6 are improved through further deployment of digital and data technologies as key enablers;
- stakeholders and end users including primary producers and consumers are better informed and engaged thanks to effective platforms such as AKIS;
- strengthened EU and international science-policy interfaces to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.
When considering their impact, proposals also need to assess their compliance with the “Do No Significant Harm” principle according to which the project’s R&I activities should not support or carry out activities that cause a significant harm to any of the six environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy Regulation [6].
Topics under this destination will have impacts in the following areas:
- “Climate change mitigation and adaptation”;
- “Clean and healthy air, water and soil”;
- “Enhancing ecosystems and biodiversity on land and in water”;
- “Sustainable food systems from farm to fork on land and sea”;
- “High quality digital services for all”;
- “A Competitive and secure data-economy”.
Social innovation is recommended when the solution is at the socio-technical interface and requires social change, new social practices, social ownership or market uptake. In this cluster, it is envisaged that topics will be coordinated with European Space Agency (ESA) actions so that ESA space data and science can be proactively integrated into the relevant research actions of the WP.
[1] https://bioeast.eu/.
[2] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/destination-earth.
[3] AKIS refers to the organisation and knowledge flows between persons, organisations and institutions who use and produce knowledge for agriculture and interrelated fields.
[4] https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/earthobservation_en.
[5] The European Commission is a member and co-chair of the Group on Earth Observations (GEO), as such the European Commission adopted the GEO Canberra Declaration and Commission Decision C(2019)7337/F1, and committed to contribute to the GEO objectives, including to the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS).
[6] As per Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (EU Taxonomy Regulation).
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
The following additional eligibility criteria apply: The proposals must use the multi-actor approach. See definition of the multi-actor approach in the introduction to this Work Programme part.
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
-
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025). [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE CSA)
Standard evaluation form — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE CSA)
MGA
Call-specific instructions
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
CALL UPDATE: EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Published: 07/12/2022
Deadline: 28/02/2024
Available budget: EUR 133.50 million
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
|
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-1 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-2 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-3 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-5 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-6 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-7 |
|
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
1 |
7 |
9 |
1 |
8 |
28 |
|
Number of inadmissible proposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of ineligible proposals |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
Number of above-threshold proposals |
1 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
5 |
18 |
|
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals |
31.519.166,00 € |
17.465.691,78 € |
14.917.894,21 € |
18.999.999,25 € |
19.985.077,50 € |
89.756.069,75 € |
|
Number of proposals retained for funding |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
Number of proposals in the reserve list |
|
2 |
1 |
|
2 |
3 |
|
Funding threshold[1] |
12.5 |
15 |
14.5 |
10 |
14.5 |
13.5 |
|
Ranking distribution |
||||||
|
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 |
|
3 |
2 |
|
3 |
2 |
|
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 |
|
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
3 |
|
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
|
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-8 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-9 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-10 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-11 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-12 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-13 |
|
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
5 |
14 |
3 |
5 |
1 |
1 |
|
Number of inadmissible proposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of ineligible proposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of above-threshold proposals |
4 |
8 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
|
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals |
7.942.065,49 € |
23.994.325,83 € |
7.749.329,18 € |
11.693.924,17 € |
3.999.982,04 € |
3.999.999,06 € |
|
Number of proposals retained for funding |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Number of proposals in the reserve list |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
Funding threshold1 |
13.5 |
14 |
14 |
15 |
12.5 |
13 |
|
Ranking distribution |
||||||
|
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
|
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 |
2 |
3 |
|
3 |
1 |
|
Summary of observer report:
An independent observer assessed the evaluation of the call and its topics, in particular focusing on: 1) the quality and correctness of information and guidelines provided to experts; 2) the efficiency and fairness of the evaluation phase; 3) the suitability of the support available throughout the evaluation process. The overall quality of the evaluation was found to be very good, fully meeting the high standards expected by the European Commission and by the applicants. Thanks to the careful organization of manpower, the evaluation proceeded without any difficulty in terms of workload. The evaluation was conducted in a fully transparent and fair way. All experts, rapporteurs, REA staff and independent observer were at each stage of the evaluation process entirely able to review and work with proposals relevant to each individual stage of the process by role. The procedures were applied in a uniform and consistent manner and in accordance with the evaluation protocols for all proposals under consideration in this evaluation, throughout the various phases that were conducted entirely remotely. The experts were provided with clear procedures. All the involved actors were fully available in the allotted timeline, while being focused, cooperative, supportive and, when required, proactive. The evaluation was fully compliant with the applicable rules, including the guidance documents that were made available to all people involved in the evaluation. These documents were all quite clear and included helpful examples for a successful evaluation. Several remarks for further improving the evaluation process were provided by the independent observer at the end of the evaluation.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
[1] Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL SUBMISSION NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01 has closed on February 28.
83 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
TOPIC Proposals Submitted
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-1 1
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-2 7
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-3 9
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-5 1
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-6 8
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-7 28
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-8 5
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-9 14
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-10 3
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-11 5
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-12 1
HORIZON-CL6-2024-GOVERNANCE-01-13 1
TOTAL 83
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in June 2024.