Increasing the circularity in plastics value chains
HORIZON Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage
- Programme
- Circular economy and bioeconomy sectors
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- October 16, 2023
- Deadline
- February 21, 2024
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €10,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €5,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 2
- Keywords
- HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stageHORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02Circular economyClimate change mitigationConsumer products and servicesEcodesign, Life Cycle AnalysisEnvironment, Pollution & ClimateNew business opportunitiesNew industrial value chainsPlastics, Marine Litter and Circular EconomyPolymers and plasticsWaste recycling
Description
A successful proposal will contribute to the following Destination impacts: i) enhance European industrial sustainability, competitiveness and resource independence, and ii) improve on consumer and citizen benefits.
Proposal results are expected to contribute to all of the following outcomes:
- Increased deployment and demonstrated benefits of advanced digital solutions (e.g., through AI, robotics, IoT and blockchain) in circular businesses including waste management and recycling;
- Emergence of new value chains using upcycled and/or recycled resources, e.g. through industrial symbiosis;
- Increased upcycling and recycling rates for the targeted material streams;
- Increased uptake of recycled material and upcycling to new higher-value products;
- Increased resource efficiency along and across value chains, causing a measurable reduction in GHG emissions and other environmental pollution and an increase of carbon removals;
- Increased diffusion of new circular business practices, in particular in the uptake of repair, reuse and remanufacturing, but also practices that form part of the sharing economy.
The new circular economy action plan (CEAP) highlights plastics as one of the four particularly important material and product streams with regard to their circularity potential and their environmental footprint. The circularity deficits for these streams are mainly due to the: lack of trust in secondary raw materials; lack of control over supply chains; lacking focus on material efficiency and design for circularity; unsustainable product lifetimes; lack of repair services; price gap between primary and secondary material; lack of secondary material markets; insufficient collection and sorting systems; insufficient and unpredictable input quality for recycling; insufficient information about quality and quantity of materials, including knowledge about possible microplastics pollution and substances of concern, lack of communication along the lifecycle between manufacturers and recyclers; lack of involvement and empowerment of citizens that would allow environmentally informed purchases.
Proposals should address the priorities set in the CEAP. Beside the continuous implementation of the EU plastics strategy, the CEAP has a strong focus on microplastics, but also calls for mandatory recycled content and the controlled use of bio-based, biodegradable plastics and alternative materials.
Proposals should demonstrate and deploy at large scale innovative solutions and designs for increased quality, non-toxicity and durability of secondary materials and increased share of secondary materials in new products. Proposals should demonstrate increased recovery, recycling and upcycling rates and a higher uptake of secondary materials for high value applications. Special attention should be given to the increased circularity of critical raw materials186. Proposals should also demonstrate circular business practices, in particular in the uptake of repair and reuse, remanufacture, product-service-systems, and in the full lifetime of products or services. To achieve this, targeted market size, economic feasibility, cost efficiency and social acceptance need to be addressed. To break down the barriers for this transition, it is important that proposals involve and address the different perspectives of all relevant actors, e.g., manufacturers, retailers, consumers and civil society organisations (CSOs). The projects should consider the use of digital solutions (including technologies such as AI, robotics, IoT and blockchain) and demonstrate their benefits for increased circularity. Proposals should aim to implement traceability solutions in support of recent policy developments, e.g. regarding the digital product passport. Projects should also help produce harmonised and robust methods to assess the amount of recycled content in sectoral products, which is key for a future review of green claims through authorities and consumer organisations. Environmental, social and economic impacts should be assessed from a lifecycle perspective as product, organisation and consumption environmental footprints, using the respective methods developed by the European Commission (Product Environmental Footprint, PEF, should be used for the assessment of the environmental impacts) and through costing methods; relevant data should be fed into the European Platform on Life Cycle Assessment, following the specific Environmental Footprint data and format requirements. The functional performance of technologies and secondary materials can be assessed through the EU Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) scheme. All project results should be validated using quantitative indicators and targets wherever possible.
Projects should also develop training material to endow workers in this occupational group with the right skillset in order to deploy the new technologies developed. Proposals should consider the development of learning resources for the current and future generations of employees, with the possibility to integrate them in existing curricula and modules for undergraduate level and lifelong learning programmes. The projects should provide contributions to relevant standards or best practices.
Proposals should build on ongoing projects funded under Horizon 2020 and Horizon Europe and envisage clustering activities with these. Social innovation is recommended when the solution is at the socio-technical interface and requires social change, new social practices, social ownership or market uptake.
The targeted TRL at the end of the projects is 6 to 8.
Destination & Scope
This destination and its topics target climate-neutrality, zero pollution[1], fair and just circular and bioeconomy transitions[2]. These cover safe, integrated circular solutions at territorial and sectoral levels, for important material flows and product value chains, such as i) textiles, ii) electronics, iii) chemicals, iv) packaging, v) tourism, vi) plastics and construction, and vii) key bioeconomy sectors such as a) sustainable bio-based systems[3], b) sustainable forestry, c) small-scale rural bio-based solutions, d) environmental services and e) aquatic (including marine and freshwater) value chains[4].
The destination supports the European Green Deal, and in particular:
- the new EU Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP), adopted in March 2020, and the subsequent initiatives along the entire life cycle of products[5];
- the EU strategy on adaptation to climate change adopted in February 2021[6];
- the EU zero pollution action plan[7], adopted in May 2021, with the chemicals strategy for sustainability[8] from October 2020 and the new approach for a sustainable blue economy[9] adopted in May 2021;
- the EU forest strategy for 2030[10]: research and innovation will be key drivers in achieving the ambitious goals of this strategy;
- the EU climate law targeting climate-neutrality by 2050 and AFOLU[11] climate-neutrality by 2035, which supports increased focus on bio-based circular consumption, as part of the Fit for 55 package proposed on 14 July 2021[12];
- the new European Bauhaus initiative[13] and the renovation wave[14].
Furthermore, the Horizon Europe work programme for 2023-2025 of will play a critical role in implementing the EU strategy for sustainable textiles[15], which highlights the strategic role Horizon Europe initiatives play in R&I in the textile ecosystem. Textiles are the fourth highest category as regards pressure on the use of primary raw materials and water and fifth for GHG emissions, and are a major source of microplastic pollution in production and use phases. They are also a key material and product stream in the circular economy action plan. Improvements in the circularity of the textile value chains will help reduce GHG emissions and environmental pressure. The framework is established in the strategy for sustainable textiles, The transition pathway is a multistakeholder process, that could support implementation Attention should be paid to ensuring a circular, safe and sustainable design and the use of new sustainable biobased materials, as well as to collection, sorting and upcycling. Automated processes and digital solutions should help increase reuse and recycling. The safe-and sustainable-by-design concept aligns circular, safety and bioeconomy approaches with zero pollution. R&I can link various EU policies, namely those related to the green and digital transition, resilience and competitiveness. Under the proposed Ecodesign Sustainable Product Regulation (SPI)[16] the Commission will set out ecodesign requirements on design in order to reduce the environmental footprint of products, striving for products to be kept in circular use for as long as possible.
The wide range of EU initiatives supported by this destination includes:
- the industrial strategy;
- the EU chemicals strategy for sustainability;
- the SME strategy;
- the revised (2018) bioeconomy strategy[17] and its action plan;
- the communication on sustainable carbon cycles;
- the sustainable blue economy approach and its offshoot initiatives;
- the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030;
- the farm to fork strategy;
- the upcoming EU agenda for tourism;
- the plastics strategy and the action plan on critical raw materials.
In addition, this destination will contribute to the transition pathways of energy-intensive industries, textiles, construction and agri-food industrial ecosystems.
Where appropriate, proposals are encouraged to cooperate with the European Commission Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy, also for the purpose of dissemination and exploitation of results.
Expected impact
Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway to:
- develop the circular economy and bioeconomy sectors;
- ensure natural resources are used and managed in sustainable and circular manner;
- prevent and remove pollution;
- unlock the full potential and benefits of the circular economy and the bioeconomy, with clean secondary raw materials, ensuring competitiveness and guaranteeing healthy soil, air, fresh and marine water for all, through better understanding of planetary boundaries and wide deployment and market uptake of innovative technologies and other solutions, notably in primary production (forestry) and bio-based systems.
More specifically, the proposed topics should contribute to one or more of the following impacts:
- Regional, rural, local/urban and consumer-based transitions are accelerated towards a sustainable, regenerative, inclusive, just and clean circular economy and bioeconomy across all regions of Europe. Special attention should be paid to the most sensitive/vulnerable[18] and greenhouse gas-intensive regions, based on better knowledge and understanding of science, and improved capacity to design, implement and monitor policies and instruments for circular and bio-based transitions.
- European industrial sustainability, competitiveness and resource independence are strengthened by reducing the use of primary non-renewable raw materials and greenhouse gases emissions and other pollutants, achieving an improved environmental footprint (including on biodiversity), enabling climate-neutrality, zero pollution[1] and higher resource efficiency. This will also be supported by increasing circular and bio-based practices in textiles, plastics, electronics and construction, developing further on industrial symbiosis as well as circularity and sustainability by design, cascading use of biomass and, clean secondary raw materials, along and across value chains.
- Innovative and sustainable value-chains are developed in the bio-based sectors replacing fossil-based value chains, increasing circular bio-based systems from sustainably sourced biological resources, and replacing carbon-intensive and fossil-based systems. Such a development will be supported through R&I in biotechnology and other enabling technologies, which is a prerequisite and driver of future solutions for a circular economy and the bioeconomy transition. This will involve with inclusive engagement with all stakeholders, including policymakers and will increase access to finance and technical support along whole supply chains for bioeconomy projects.
- The benefit for consumers and citizens, including those in rural areas, are improved by establishing circular and bio-based systems based on sustainability, inclusiveness, zero pollution[1], health and safety. All value chain actors (manufacturers, retailers, service industry, consumers, public administration, including on regional level, primary biomass producers etc.) are involved to a significantly higher degree.
- Multi-functionality and management of forests in Europe are safeguarded based on the three pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental and social), in particular to optimise the contribution of forests and the forest-based sector in mitigating and adapting to climate change.
- Potential of marine and freshwater biological resources and blue biotechnology is enlarged to i) deliver greener (climate-neutral and circular) industrial products and processes, ii) help characterise, monitor and sustain the health of aquatic ecosystems for a healthy planet and people, and iii) help in the drafting of proposals for accompanying changes in regulation where necessary.
[1] See also Destination 4 ‘Clean environment and Zero pollution’ of this Cluster.
[2] Synergies ensured with Horizon Europe Clusters 4 and 5 (including their European public private partnerships), while Cluster 4 targets the industrial dimension (including digitalisation, circularity and climate-neutrality / low GHGs emissions industry transition, including developing bio-integrated manufacturing). Cluster 5 covers cost-efficient, net zero-GHGs energy systems, centred on renewables (including the R&I needed to reduce CO2 emissions from the power and energy-intensive industry sectors, such as solutions for capturing, utilising and storage of CO2 (CCUS), bioenergy/biofuels and other industrial sectors) Cluster 6 covers the research and innovation based on sustainable biological resources (bioeconomy sectors), in particular for new sustainable feedstock development and valorisation through the development of integrated bio-refineries).
[3] In synergy and complementarity with the EU public-private partnership for a ‘Circular Bio-based Europe’ (CBE JU), (especially as related to the size of actions – IAs and RIAs, and Technology Readiness Level and the industrial-focus of activities, with the first CBE calls expected in 2022).
[4] In synergy and complementarity with the EU partnership for a climate-neutral, sustainable and productive blue economy and with the EU mission ‘Restore our Ocean and Waters by 2030’.
[5] It targets how products are designed, promotes circular economy processes, encourages sustainable consumption, and aims to ensure that waste is prevented and the resources used are kept in the economy for as long as possible. This plan also aims to ensure that the circular economy works for people, regions and cities, fully contributes to climate-neutrality, zero pollution and resource use decoupling and harnesses the potential of research, innovation and digitalisation
[6] COM(2021)82 final “Forging a climate-resilient Europe - the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate”.
[7] COM(2021)400 final ‘Pathway to a Healthy Planet for All EU Action Plan: “Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil’.
[8] COM(2020) 667 final ‘Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment’.
[9] COM(2021)240 final ‘On a new approach for a sustainable blue economy in the EU Transforming the EU's Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future’.
[10] COM(2021)572 final ‘New EU Forest Strategy for 2030’.
[11] AFOLU: “Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use”.
[12] COM(2021)550 final “'Fit for 55': delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality”.
[13] COM(2021)573 final “New European Bauhaus Beautiful, Sustainable, Together”.
[14] COM(2020)662 final “A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives”.
[15] COM(2022)141 final “EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles”.
[16] COM(2022)142 final Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC .
[17] European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European bioeconomy policy: stocktaking and future developments: report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/997651.
[18] Taking into account all aspects of sustainability, i.e. social, economic and environmental, and in particular sensitivity/vulnerability to the effects of the climate change, as well as due to the current social dependency on fossil resources, especially in remote, rural and low-income regions and cities.
[19] See also Destination 4 ‘Clean environment and Zero pollution’ of this Cluster.
[20] See also Destination 4 ‘Clean environment and Zero pollution’ of this Cluster.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
Applicants submitting a proposal under the blind evaluation pilot (see General Annex F) must not disclose their organisation names, acronyms, logos, nor names of personnel in Part B of their first stage application (see General Annex E).
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes
This topic is part of the blind evaluation pilot under which first stage proposals will be evaluated blindly.
-
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
-
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
-
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard application form (HE RIA IA Stage 1)
Standard evaluation form — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA and CSA Stage 1)
MGA
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
EVALUATION results
Published: 07/12/2022
Deadline: 17/09/2024
Available budget:
Topic ID | Types of action | Budget |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage | HORIZON-RIA | 15,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage | HORIZON-IA | 10,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage | HORIZON-IA | 10,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage | HORIZON-IA | 15,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage | HORIZON-RIA | 8,00 |
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage | HORIZON-IA | 15,00 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage | HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 10 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 10 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals | €50,011,951.00 | €39,152,924.29 | €49,627,476.13 | €39,798,725.36 | €39,856,323.00 | €49,807,352.44 |
Number of proposals retained for funding | 3 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Summary of observer report:
The report refers to the evaluation exercise of the HORIZON-2024-CL6 Second stage call which included 11 different topics and 99 proposals to be assessed. Two independent observers were appointed by REA to monitor the evaluation process from the point of view of its working and execution. The observers analysed the process including the remote individual evaluations and consensus phase. The entire evaluation process was very efficient and executed in a timely manner. The REA staff involved with different roles and responsibilities in the exercise performed very professionally and ensured impartiality, fairness and confidentiality of the evaluation as well as a full compliance with applicable rules. The independent experts appointed by REA to assess the proposals demonstrated high commitment to their tasks and worked hard throughout the entire evaluation. They submitted high quality Individual Evaluation Reports and actively participated in the virtual consensus meetings by thoroughly analysing the various criteria and sub-criteria, thus reaching a genuine consensus. Rapporteurs appointed by REA recorded the views of the experts in coherent Consensus Reports. All reports were submitted on time, thus allowing the successful completion of the exercise. In summary, the evaluation exercise went very well with a high-quality outcome in terms of fair and transparent treatment of each proposal. No issues have been observed.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02_stage2 has closed on the 17/09/2024.
56 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage : 10 proposals
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage : 8 proposals
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage : 10 proposals
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage : 8 proposals
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage : 10 proposals
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage : 10 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in January 2025
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Deadline: 22/02/2024
Available budget: EUR 73,000,000.00
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):
|
Topic ID |
Topic short name |
Overall threshold applied |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage |
Circular solutions for textile value chains through innovative sorting, recycling, and design for recycling |
9 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage |
Increasing the circularity in plastics value chains |
9.5 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage |
Increasing the circularity in electronics value chains |
8 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage |
New circular solutions and decentralised approaches for water and wastewater management |
9.5 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage |
Circular design of bio-based processes and products |
10 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage |
From silos to diversity – small-scale bio-based demonstration pilots |
8.5 |
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
|
Topic Id |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
Number of inadmissible proposals |
Number of ineligible proposals |
Number of above-threshold proposals |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage |
62 |
1 |
0 |
10 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage |
42 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage |
21 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage |
44 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage |
60 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage |
26 |
2 |
1 |
10 |
Summary of observer report:
This report describes the observers´ assessment of the evaluation of the 1st stage proposals of the two stage calls: HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02, HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02 and HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-02. The report analyses the efficiency of the procedures, usability of the instruments (including IT tools), conduct and fairness of the evaluation sessions, and compliance with the applicable rules. The objective is to give independent advice for improving the evaluation processes for EU funding.
The evaluation of the first stage proposals of the three calls involved the assessment of 444 proposals. Overall, 176 independent evaluators were assigned to the first stage evaluations. The fully remote and on-line evaluation was observed to be efficient and appropriate. The briefings and the material sent to experts beforehand was found excellent. In general, the consensus was well reached in SEP with the help of a task comment box. All the proposals were evaluated and treated according to the EU Commission rules and guidelines.
The highest degree of confidentiality was maintained. The evaluation was conducted in full conformity with the published procedures and according to the applicable rules. The compliance with the rules was systematically emphasised during all stages of evaluation. The significance of confidentiality and the conflict of interest were highlighted in several stages of the evaluation. No deviations from these rules and procedures were observed. In general, the entire evaluation was very well organised and executed, and there were no issues which would require strong recommendations. The process was observed to be transparent and fair, and the final scoring and ranking properly reflected the value of the proposals. We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation for call topic HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage:
For some proposals:
- A distinction is missing between the considered types of plastics or bioplastics and how their nature can affect technology.
- The microplastic issue, which is a strong focus of the CEAP, and is mentioned in the scope of the topic, is not convincingly addressed.
- The contribution to standardisation activities is not sufficiently described.
- The state of the art is not always adequately supported by references and the reasons why current technologies are either not satisfactory or not cost effective, or not environmentally friendly, are not sufficiently explained.
- The robustness of the proposed AI system is not sufficiently addressed.
- The scale and significance of the project’s contribution to the expected outcomes and impacts are not clearly quantified, including relevant baselines and assumptions.
- The potential barriers to the expected outcomes and impacts were identified, but mitigation measures remained generic.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02 has closed on February 22.
255 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
Topic Id Proposals Received
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage 62
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage 42
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage 21
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage 44
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage 60
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage 26
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in June 2023