Closed

Circular solutions for textile value chains through innovative sorting, recycling, and design for recycling

HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage
Programme
Circular economy and bioeconomy sectors
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
October 16, 2023
Deadline
February 21, 2024
Deadline Model
two-stage
Budget
€10,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€5,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€5,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
2
Keywords
HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stageHORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02Circular economyClimate change mitigationEcodesign, Life Cycle AnalysisEnvironment, Pollution & ClimateNew business opportunitiesNew industrial value chainsPolymers and plasticsTextilesTextiles including synthetic dyes, colours, fibresWaste managementWaste recycling

Description

Expected Outcome:

A successful proposal will contribute to the following Destination impacts: i) enhance European industrial sustainability, competitiveness and resource independence, and ii) improve on consumer and citizen benefits.

Project results are expected to contribute to at least two of the following outcomes:

  • Roll-out of systemic solutions for textile sorting, using innovative digital technologies (such as AI, robotics, IoT and blockchain);
  • Roll-out of feasible solutions for facilitated disintegration to be incorporated in product design, as an enabler for recycling;
  • Increased uptake of mechanical recycling solutions that deliver competitive, high-quality secondary materials;
  • Roll-out of thermo-mechanical, chemical and other (e.g., enzymatic) recycling solutions that are sustainable from a zero-pollution, circular material and energy efficiency perspective.
Scope:

The topic aims at improved management of the end-of-life phase of textile products. Proposals should address one or more of the following subjects and aim to combine them where relevant in a systemic way: facilitation of the disintegration of textile products through design, sorting, and recycling of textiles.

Textiles are the fourth highest-pressure category for the use of primary raw materials and water and fifth for GHG emissions and a major source of microplastic pollution in production and use phases. They are also a key material and product stream in the circular economy action plan. The purpose of this initiative is also to minimise the use of hazardous substances in processing and textile treatments. Proposals shall also demonstrate and deploy innovative solutions for increased quality, non-toxicity and durability of secondary textile materials and their processing and treatments.

Facilitation of the disintegration of textile products:

Beside the fibre composition affecting recyclability, textile products can also consist of various non-textile components or accessories, and can be coated, laminated or printed on. These hard parts, trims, coatings and laminated layers hamper recycling and are a major barrier for practically all textile fibre recycling technologies, especially chemical recycling technologies. The removal of these non-textile components requires disassembly prior to recycling, adding costs to the overall recycling process. Despite the various research projects on this topic, the implementation and uptake of these techniques is still far from reality. Proposals should address these challenges. New approaches should also be tested, involving technologies such as robotics and AI. Irrespective of the remaining technological and economical challenges, the implementation of disintegration techniques also requires a system, in which products that are fitted with any of these techniques are properly collected, recognised, and sent towards the right facility to apply the appropriate triggering mechanism.

Systemic solutions for sorting:

Over the coming years, the collected volumes of post-consumer textile waste are expected to increase by a further 65,000 to 90,000 tonnes per year due to the increased amounts of textiles placed on the market and the obligation to separately collect textile waste, which Member States have to put in place by 1 January 2025. This will further increase the need for advanced sorting for collecting organisations in order to create economic value out of this. At the moment, sorting is still mainly a manual process, having a significant contribution to the total process costs of recycled textile fibres. The cost of manual sorting is a major barrier to cost effective production of feedstock for textile fibre recycling. Automated sorting has the potential to deliver sufficient, well-defined and low-cost input to recycling processes, however, to date, this potential is not yet fulfilled. New technologies exist, but their limitations need to be addressed. Due to the limited penetration depth of NIR light, only the surface composition of textiles can be detected. RFID technology requires the textile products to carry an RFID tag and an entire system behind, adapted by all parts of the value chain. Therefore, proposals should develop systemic digital solutions that facilitate traceability and comprehensive exchange of information along the entire value chain, involving the use of technologies such as blockchain, AI and IoT. Proposals should build knowledge and competence regarding information system models, systems for data collection, provide an overview of existing standards and mapping of standardisation needs, include cost calculations and evaluation of Return On Investment (ROI), and consider implications of integrating digital information carriers in textile products.

Further development of textile recycling technologies:

In view of the huge amount of textile waste, which will have to be handled due to the soon mandatory separate collection, possible product requirements such as recycled content and the potential offered by different types of textile recycling, different ways of textile recycling remain relevant and will all be needed in the implementation of the textiles strategy. Mechanical recycling of textiles is an established technology in the market. However, the amount of spinnable fibre and the quality of the fibres should be improved. The integration of robotics, AI, or IoT components will play a role in the improvement of these processes. Thermo-mechanical recycling is a process that is still under development and further research is needed to improve the yield of recycled content and the use of chemicals to increase the quality of the polymer. Chemical and enzymatic recycling are novel technologies. Proposals should upscale polymer recycling of cotton via a pulping process and incorporate customer feedback for optimisation of the process and continuous delivery of suitable textile waste (in terms of purity and composition) as feedstock. Other options that can be explored are the recycling of polycotton blends and the monomer recycling of PET. The application of these technologies in research and innovation should also be extended to other types of fibres.

Clustering activities with projects under “HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-01-2: Circular solutions for textile value chains based on extended producer responsibility” should be envisaged. A lifecycle perspective using LCA and LCC should be used when validating the technical and economic feasibility of the developed, improved, demonstrated and up-scaled processes. Proposals should also address the issue of side streams such as wastewater and the treatment and reuse. Novel value chain-based solutions through industrial symbiosis should be encouraged. For comparability reasons, LCAs should use well-established methods and be based on PEF wherever feasible. Proposals should fully incorporate the Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) approach. Particular attention should also be given to the implementation of traceability solutions, also with a view to recent policy developments, e.g. the digital product passport. The participation of SMEs and industry is encouraged.

The targeted TRL at the end of the projects is 5 to 6.

Destination & Scope

This destination and its topics target climate-neutrality, zero pollution[1], fair and just circular and bioeconomy transitions[2]. These cover safe, integrated circular solutions at territorial and sectoral levels, for important material flows and product value chains, such as i) textiles, ii) electronics, iii) chemicals, iv) packaging, v) tourism, vi) plastics and construction, and vii) key bioeconomy sectors such as a) sustainable bio-based systems[3], b) sustainable forestry, c) small-scale rural bio-based solutions, d) environmental services and e) aquatic (including marine and freshwater) value chains[4].

The destination supports the European Green Deal, and in particular:

  • the new EU Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP), adopted in March 2020, and the subsequent initiatives along the entire life cycle of products[5];
  • the EU strategy on adaptation to climate change adopted in February 2021[6];
  • the EU zero pollution action plan[7], adopted in May 2021, with the chemicals strategy for sustainability[8] from October 2020 and the new approach for a sustainable blue economy[9] adopted in May 2021;
  • the EU forest strategy for 2030[10]: research and innovation will be key drivers in achieving the ambitious goals of this strategy;
  • the EU climate law targeting climate-neutrality by 2050 and AFOLU[11] climate-neutrality by 2035, which supports increased focus on bio-based circular consumption, as part of the Fit for 55 package proposed on 14 July 2021[12];
  • the new European Bauhaus initiative[13] and the renovation wave[14].

Furthermore, the Horizon Europe work programme for 2023-2025 of will play a critical role in implementing the EU strategy for sustainable textiles[15], which highlights the strategic role Horizon Europe initiatives play in R&I in the textile ecosystem. Textiles are the fourth highest category as regards pressure on the use of primary raw materials and water and fifth for GHG emissions, and are a major source of microplastic pollution in production and use phases. They are also a key material and product stream in the circular economy action plan. Improvements in the circularity of the textile value chains will help reduce GHG emissions and environmental pressure. The framework is established in the strategy for sustainable textiles, The transition pathway is a multistakeholder process, that could support implementation Attention should be paid to ensuring a circular, safe and sustainable design and the use of new sustainable biobased materials, as well as to collection, sorting and upcycling. Automated processes and digital solutions should help increase reuse and recycling. The safe-and sustainable-by-design concept aligns circular, safety and bioeconomy approaches with zero pollution. R&I can link various EU policies, namely those related to the green and digital transition, resilience and competitiveness. Under the proposed Ecodesign Sustainable Product Regulation (SPI)[16] the Commission will set out ecodesign requirements on design in order to reduce the environmental footprint of products, striving for products to be kept in circular use for as long as possible.

The wide range of EU initiatives supported by this destination includes:

  • the industrial strategy;
  • the EU chemicals strategy for sustainability;
  • the SME strategy;
  • the revised (2018) bioeconomy strategy[17] and its action plan;
  • the communication on sustainable carbon cycles;
  • the sustainable blue economy approach and its offshoot initiatives;
  • the EU biodiversity strategy for 2030;
  • the farm to fork strategy;
  • the upcoming EU agenda for tourism;
  • the plastics strategy and the action plan on critical raw materials.

In addition, this destination will contribute to the transition pathways of energy-intensive industries, textiles, construction and agri-food industrial ecosystems.

Where appropriate, proposals are encouraged to cooperate with the European Commission Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy, also for the purpose of dissemination and exploitation of results.

Expected impact

Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway to:

  • develop the circular economy and bioeconomy sectors;
  • ensure natural resources are used and managed in sustainable and circular manner;
  • prevent and remove pollution;
  • unlock the full potential and benefits of the circular economy and the bioeconomy, with clean secondary raw materials, ensuring competitiveness and guaranteeing healthy soil, air, fresh and marine water for all, through better understanding of planetary boundaries and wide deployment and market uptake of innovative technologies and other solutions, notably in primary production (forestry) and bio-based systems.

More specifically, the proposed topics should contribute to one or more of the following impacts:

  • Regional, rural, local/urban and consumer-based transitions are accelerated towards a sustainable, regenerative, inclusive, just and clean circular economy and bioeconomy across all regions of Europe. Special attention should be paid to the most sensitive/vulnerable[18] and greenhouse gas-intensive regions, based on better knowledge and understanding of science, and improved capacity to design, implement and monitor policies and instruments for circular and bio-based transitions.
  • European industrial sustainability, competitiveness and resource independence are strengthened by reducing the use of primary non-renewable raw materials and greenhouse gases emissions and other pollutants, achieving an improved environmental footprint (including on biodiversity), enabling climate-neutrality, zero pollution[1] and higher resource efficiency. This will also be supported by increasing circular and bio-based practices in textiles, plastics, electronics and construction, developing further on industrial symbiosis as well as circularity and sustainability by design, cascading use of biomass and, clean secondary raw materials, along and across value chains.
  • Innovative and sustainable value-chains are developed in the bio-based sectors replacing fossil-based value chains, increasing circular bio-based systems from sustainably sourced biological resources, and replacing carbon-intensive and fossil-based systems. Such a development will be supported through R&I in biotechnology and other enabling technologies, which is a prerequisite and driver of future solutions for a circular economy and the bioeconomy transition. This will involve with inclusive engagement with all stakeholders, including policymakers and will increase access to finance and technical support along whole supply chains for bioeconomy projects.
  • The benefit for consumers and citizens, including those in rural areas, are improved by establishing circular and bio-based systems based on sustainability, inclusiveness, zero pollution[1], health and safety. All value chain actors (manufacturers, retailers, service industry, consumers, public administration, including on regional level, primary biomass producers etc.) are involved to a significantly higher degree.
  • Multi-functionality and management of forests in Europe are safeguarded based on the three pillars of sustainability (economic, environmental and social), in particular to optimise the contribution of forests and the forest-based sector in mitigating and adapting to climate change.
  • Potential of marine and freshwater biological resources and blue biotechnology is enlarged to i) deliver greener (climate-neutral and circular) industrial products and processes, ii) help characterise, monitor and sustain the health of aquatic ecosystems for a healthy planet and people, and iii) help in the drafting of proposals for accompanying changes in regulation where necessary.

[1] See also Destination 4 ‘Clean environment and Zero pollution’ of this Cluster.

[2] Synergies ensured with Horizon Europe Clusters 4 and 5 (including their European public private partnerships), while Cluster 4 targets the industrial dimension (including digitalisation, circularity and climate-neutrality / low GHGs emissions industry transition, including developing bio-integrated manufacturing). Cluster 5 covers cost-efficient, net zero-GHGs energy systems, centred on renewables (including the R&I needed to reduce CO2 emissions from the power and energy-intensive industry sectors, such as solutions for capturing, utilising and storage of CO2 (CCUS), bioenergy/biofuels and other industrial sectors) Cluster 6 covers the research and innovation based on sustainable biological resources (bioeconomy sectors), in particular for new sustainable feedstock development and valorisation through the development of integrated bio-refineries).

[3] In synergy and complementarity with the EU public-private partnership for a ‘Circular Bio-based Europe’ (CBE JU), (especially as related to the size of actions – IAs and RIAs, and Technology Readiness Level and the industrial-focus of activities, with the first CBE calls expected in 2022).

[4] In synergy and complementarity with the EU partnership for a climate-neutral, sustainable and productive blue economy and with the EU mission ‘Restore our Ocean and Waters by 2030’.

[5] It targets how products are designed, promotes circular economy processes, encourages sustainable consumption, and aims to ensure that waste is prevented and the resources used are kept in the economy for as long as possible. This plan also aims to ensure that the circular economy works for people, regions and cities, fully contributes to climate-neutrality, zero pollution and resource use decoupling and harnesses the potential of research, innovation and digitalisation

[6] COM(2021)82 final “Forging a climate-resilient Europe - the new EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate”.

[7] COM(2021)400 final ‘Pathway to a Healthy Planet for All EU Action Plan: “Towards Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil’.

[8] COM(2020) 667 final ‘Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability Towards a Toxic-Free Environment’.

[9] COM(2021)240 final ‘On a new approach for a sustainable blue economy in the EU Transforming the EU's Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future’.

[10] COM(2021)572 final ‘New EU Forest Strategy for 2030’.

[11] AFOLU: “Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use”.

[12] COM(2021)550 final “'Fit for 55': delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality”.

[13] COM(2021)573 final “New European Bauhaus Beautiful, Sustainable, Together”.

[14] COM(2020)662 final “A Renovation Wave for Europe - greening our buildings, creating jobs, improving lives”.

[15] COM(2022)141 final “EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles”.

[16] COM(2022)142 final Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing a framework for setting ecodesign requirements for sustainable products and repealing Directive 2009/125/EC .

[17] European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation, European bioeconomy policy: stocktaking and future developments: report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Publications Office of the European Union, 2022, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/997651.

[18] Taking into account all aspects of sustainability, i.e. social, economic and environmental, and in particular sensitivity/vulnerability to the effects of the climate change, as well as due to the current social dependency on fossil resources, especially in remote, rural and low-income regions and cities.

[19] See also Destination 4 ‘Clean environment and Zero pollution’ of this Cluster.

[20] See also Destination 4 ‘Clean environment and Zero pollution’ of this Cluster.

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

Applicants submitting a proposal under the blind evaluation pilot (see General Annex F) must not disclose their organisation names, acronyms, logos, nor names of personnel in Part B of their first stage application (see General Annex E).

General conditions

1. Admissibility conditions: described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System

2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes

This topic is part of the blind evaluation pilot under which first stage proposals will be evaluated blindly.

  • Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual

  • Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

Specific conditions

7. Specific conditions: described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]

 

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.



CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.  

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

 

Latest Updates

Last Changed: February 5, 2025

EVALUATION results

Published: 07/12/2022

Deadline: 17/09/2024

Available budget:

Topic ID

Types of action

Budget

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage

HORIZON-RIA

15,00

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage

HORIZON-IA

10,00

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage

HORIZON-IA

10,00

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage

HORIZON-IA

15,00

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage

HORIZON-RIA

8,00

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage

HORIZON-IA

15,00



The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:



HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

10

8

10

8

10

10

Number of inadmissible proposals

0

0

0

0

0

0

Number of ineligible proposals

0

0

0

0

0

0

Number of above-threshold proposals

10

8

10

8

10

10

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals

€50,011,951.00

 €39,152,924.29

 €49,627,476.13

 €39,798,725.36

 €39,856,323.00

 €49,807,352.44

Number of proposals retained for funding

3

2

2

3

2

3

Number of proposals in the reserve list

2

1

2

2

2

2



Summary of observer report:

The report refers to the evaluation exercise of the HORIZON-2024-CL6 Second stage call which included 11 different topics and 99 proposals to be assessed. Two independent observers were appointed by REA to monitor the evaluation process from the point of view of its working and execution. The observers analysed the process including the remote individual evaluations and consensus phase. The entire evaluation process was very efficient and executed in a timely manner. The REA staff involved with different roles and responsibilities in the exercise performed very professionally and ensured impartiality, fairness and confidentiality of the evaluation as well as a full compliance with applicable rules. The independent experts appointed by REA to assess the proposals demonstrated high commitment to their tasks and worked hard throughout the entire evaluation. They submitted high quality Individual Evaluation Reports and actively participated in the virtual consensus meetings by thoroughly analysing the various criteria and sub-criteria, thus reaching a genuine consensus. Rapporteurs appointed by REA recorded the views of the experts in coherent Consensus Reports. All reports were submitted on time, thus allowing the successful completion of the exercise. In summary, the evaluation exercise went very well with a high-quality outcome in terms of fair and transparent treatment of each proposal. No issues have been observed.

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.



Last Changed: September 19, 2024

CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS



PROPOSAL NUMBERS

Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02_stage2 has closed on the 17/09/2024.

56 proposals have been submitted.

The breakdown per topic is:

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage      :          10         proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage      :          8          proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage      :          10         proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage      :          8          proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage      :          10         proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage      :          10         proposals

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in January 2025

Last Changed: July 16, 2024

CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS

 

EVALUATION results

Deadline: 22/02/2024

Available budget: EUR 73,000,000.00

In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):

Topic ID

Topic short name

Overall threshold applied

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage

Circular solutions for textile value chains through innovative sorting, recycling, and design for recycling

9

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage

Increasing the circularity in plastics value chains

9.5

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage

Increasing the circularity in electronics value chains

8

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage

New circular solutions and decentralised approaches for water and wastewater management

9.5

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage

Circular design of bio-based processes and products

10

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage

From silos to diversity – small-scale bio-based demonstration pilots

8.5

 

The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:

Topic Id

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls)

Number of inadmissible proposals

Number of ineligible proposals

Number of above-threshold proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage

62

1

0

10

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage

42

1

2

8

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage

21

0

0

10

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage

44

0

0

8

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage

60

2

1

10

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage

26

2

1

10

 

Summary of observer report:

This report describes the observers´ assessment of the evaluation of the 1st stage proposals of the two stage calls: HORIZON-CL6-2024-BIODIV-02, HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02 and HORIZON-CL6-2024-ZEROPOLLUTION-02. The report analyses the efficiency of the procedures, usability of the instruments (including IT tools), conduct and fairness of the evaluation sessions, and compliance with the applicable rules. The objective is to give independent advice for improving the evaluation processes for EU funding.

The evaluation of the first stage proposals of the three calls involved the assessment of 444 proposals. Overall, 176 independent evaluators were assigned to the first stage evaluations. The fully remote and on-line evaluation was observed to be efficient and appropriate. The briefings and the material sent to experts beforehand was found excellent. In general, the consensus was well reached in SEP with the help of a task comment box. All the proposals were evaluated and treated according to the EU Commission rules and guidelines.

The highest degree of confidentiality was maintained. The evaluation was conducted in full conformity with the published procedures and according to the applicable rules. The compliance with the rules was systematically emphasised during all stages of evaluation. The significance of confidentiality and the conflict of interest were highlighted in several stages of the evaluation. No deviations from these rules and procedures were observed. In general, the entire evaluation was very well organised and executed, and there were no issues which would require strong recommendations. The process was observed to be transparent and fair, and the final scoring and ranking properly reflected the value of the proposals. We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.



Last Changed: June 6, 2024

 

GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1

In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.

Information & tips

Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation for call topic HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage:

For some proposals:

 

  • The advancement beyond the state-of-the-art (e.g. in terms of Technological Readiness Levels) is not convincingly described for some of the proposed technologies. TRL 4 at the end of the project is not in line with the topic.
  • The explanation of the-state-of-the-art of AI assisted sorting systems for textile waste is insufficiently explained.
  • Proposed technologies are not convincingly referenced, and their novelty is not appropriately justified.
  • The consideration of the technical robustness of AI is not clearly addressed. Technical details of the proposed AI system are not sufficiently substantiated.
  • Some aspects of the methodology (type of the textile material to be used with inkjet technology) are not clearly or convincingly elaborated.
  • Aspects of automatic disintegration of RFID tags using robotics are not sufficiently presented.
  • The issue of standards is not sufficiently addressed.
  • Open science practices are not sufficiently addressed.
  • The scale and significance of the project’s contribution to the expected outcomes and impacts are not clearly quantified.
  • Research and technological barriers to the project outcomes (such as potential barriers to the chemical, mechanical and enzymatic methods) that can strongly influence the pathways toward impact, have not been sufficiently well presented.
  • Appropriate mitigation measures for the potential barriers that may determine if the desired outcomes and impacts are achieved, are not sufficiently considered.

 

In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.

Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.

Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.

Last Changed: February 28, 2024

CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS

 

PROPOSAL NUMBERS

Call HORIZON-CL6-2024-CIRCBIO-02 has closed on February 22.

255 proposals have been submitted.

The breakdown per topic is:

 

Topic Id                                                                Proposals Received

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage       62

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage       42

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage       21

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage       44

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage       60

HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage       26

 

Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in June 2023

Last Changed: October 17, 2023
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-1-two-stage(HORIZON-RIA), HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-6-two-stage(HORIZON-IA), HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-3-two-stage(HORIZON-IA), HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-4-two-stage(HORIZON-IA), HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-2-two-stage(HORIZON-IA), HORIZON-CL6-2024-CircBio-02-5-two-stage(HORIZON-RIA)
Circular solutions for textile value chains through innovative sorting, recycling, and design for recycling | Grantalist