Closed

Developing nature-based therapy for health and well-being

HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage
Programme
Resilient, inclusive, healthy and green rural, coastal and urban communities
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
October 27, 2021
Deadline
February 22, 2022
Deadline Model
two-stage
Budget
€19,000,000
Min Grant Amount
€6,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€6,000,000
Expected Number of Grants
3
Keywords
HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stageHORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-two-stageBehavioural sciencesBehaviourismEcosystem-Based ApproachEnvironment and health risks, occupational medicineEnvironmental healthEnvironmental sciences (social aspects)Environmental stressorsForest ecosystem servicesGreen and blue infrastructureHealth and Ecosystem ServicesHealth behaviourHealth services, health care researchHealth-enhancing physical activityHealthy ageingHealthy lifestyleMental healthNatural parksNature-based solutionsPopulation dynamics, aging, health and societyPublic and environmental healthPublic health and epidemiologySedentary behaviourSustainable development and nature protectionSustainable innovationWellbeing

Description

Expected Outcome:

A successful proposal will contribute to the EU’s goal of leading just, digital, economic and ecological transitions that will leave no one behind, supporting in particular European Green Deal priorities such as the biodiversity strategy for 2030. R&I will support the development of nature-based therapy to help communities turn the ecological transition into opportunities for good health and well-being, increased resilience, and positive long-term prospects such as the creation of green jobs.

Project results are expected to contribute to all following expected outcomes:

  • Sharper view of green space management, nature protection, agriculture and forestry sectors as care providers and their possible linkages with the healthcare, social and educational sectors;
  • Stronger evidence base for the causal relationships between nature and health and well-being for more effective nature therapy prescriptions;
  • Cost-effective nature therapy prescriptions are more widely used in the health care sector;
  • Greater citizen and policy-maker awareness of the positive benefits of nature for health and well-being;
  • Wider utilization by healthcare professionals and citizens of nature therapy as a form of preventive medicine.
Scope:

Nature affects human health in different ways. In particular, urban environments can have a negative impact on physical and mental health. This is due to urban stressors such as increased noise levels, higher crime rates and higher levels of pollution. The total global burden of disease attributable to mental illness has recently been estimated to be as high as 32% of total years lived with disability and 13% of disability-adjusted life-years, on par with cardiovascular and circulatory diseases. It is important, therefore, to determine the degree to which nature experience might lessen and address this burden. Even more so in view of the fact that the opportunities and time spent in nature are decreasing.

However, despite many putative positive correlations identified between nature and health and well-being, the causal understanding of relationships between health and nature exposure are not well understood. The long-term effects are also less well studied and recognised in policies. Social, economic and cultural factors strongly mediate the strength and direction of linkages between health and nature. Age, gender and especially socio-economic status may modify the association between greenness and health behaviours and outcomes and need to be better understood to create more effective nature therapy. Additionally, mental health benefits may vary with the type of interaction with nature and the form of sensory input. Furthermore, the health and well-being benefits of exposure to nature are affected by cultural perspectives and experiences relating to social interaction and contact with the natural environment.

A successful proposal should:

  • Develop a common framework to increasingly recognise and promote contact with nature, including protected areas and other green and blue spaces, as a cost-effective response for the prevention and treatment of human health and well-being;
  • Propose an interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach, including the involvement of the health care sector, land owners, as well as green space management and nature protection sectors;
  • Improve schemes monitoring nature-health linkages to enhance the evidence base and tools for the health care sector, green space management, nature protection, urban planning and landscape architecture;
  • Develop longitudinal prospective methods, (quasi-) experiments or well-controlled interventions, to provide more evidence of the causal relationships between nature and health and well-being:
    • Understanding of when people explicitly choose to go to an urban green space and what experiences they have there (e.g., active versus passive activities).
    • Determining the type of interactions and dose of interactions necessary for long-term health and well-being benefits.
    • Understanding the mediators of the health-nature relationship, such as age, gender, socio-economic status or culture.
    • Considering the difference between greenness quantity and quality and determining which aspects of natural features are relevant to mental health.
    • Understanding how different geographical locations and factors such as population density affect the health-nature relationships;
  • Test nature therapy sessions, identify best-practices and develop the necessary tools and guidelines for integration of nature-based care in the public health sector;
  • Identify legal and administrative arrangements, partnerships, and financial mechanisms for implementation of nature therapy sessions.

The proposals should address all of the above points.

Proposals should bring together from the start multiple types of scientific expertise in both health and natural sciences, as well as social sciences and humanities, together with a variety of community and health sector representatives, businesses, civil society organisations and citizens.

Proposals should ensure that all evidence, information and project outputs will be accessible through the Oppla portal (the EU repository for nature-based solutions)[1].

Applicants should create synergies with projects under the same topic and other relevant ongoing or up-coming projects, notably the Horizon 2020 NBS project portfolio and its task forces; HORIZON-CL6-2021-BIODIV-01-05: The economics of nature-based solutions: cost-benefit analysis, market development and funding; HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-01-03: Network for nature: multi-stakeholder dialogue platform to promote nature-based solutions; HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-01-05: Assessing the socio-politics of nature-based solutions for more inclusive and resilient communities; HORIZON-CL6-2021-COMMUNITIES-01-06: Inside and outside: educational innovation with nature-based solutions. To this end, proposals should include dedicated tasks and appropriate resources for coordination measures, foresee joint activities and joint deliverables.

Social innovation is recommended when the solution is at the socio-technical interface and requires social change, new social practices, social ownership or market uptake.

In order to achieve the expected outcomes, international cooperation is strongly encouraged, in particular with the USA, Japan and the LAC region.

This topic should involve the effective contribution of SSH disciplines.

[1] https://oppla.eu/.

Destination & Scope

Places and people matter to the achievement of a more sustainable Europe. The Sustainable Development Goals and the ecological and digital transitions brought forward by the European Green Deal[1] and digital strategy[2], alongside the recent pandemic, bring challenges and opportunities that differ for different places and people. Rural (including mountains and sparsely populated areas) and coastal areas, play a key role in managing, protecting and using natural resources. The provision of both private and public goods from these areas depends on the resilience and attractiveness of rural and coastal communities and the capacity of people who live and work there to access a sufficient level of well-being. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted deficiencies in digital infrastructures and economic opportunities that hamper resilience. Urban communities generally offer better access to many services but are also more vulnerable to supply-chain disruptions, as shown during the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, they have a key role to play in fostering sustainable production and consumption as major demand drivers. In all communities, social and behavioural drivers play an important role in enabling or slowing down transitions. Knowledge and innovative solutions need to be developed to enhance every community’s resilience and capacity to contribute to and benefit from the upcoming transitions in an economy that works for all territories and ensures a fair and just transition leaving no one behind.

Under this destination, transdisciplinary R&I with a strong social and behavioural sciences dimension, and attention to gender aspects, will foster a sustainable, balanced and inclusive development of rural[3], coastal and urban areas in three different ways. Firstly, it will aim to increase our understanding of the differential impacts of climate, environmental, socio-economic and demographic changes on rural, coastal and urban areas in order to identify ways to turn these changes into equal opportunities for people wherever they live, enhancing territorial cohesion and enabling a just transition. Secondly, it will explore innovative ways to tailor policy responses to the place-based challenges identified at various levels of governance. Thirdly, it will support bottom-up community-led innovation to empower communities to develop, test and upscale solutions that answer global challenges in locally adapted ways. Achieving policy goals require providing people with more equitable access to the knowledge and skills required to make informed choices and be actively engaged in the sustainable and circular management of natural resources, from production or service provision to consumption. Rural, coastal and urban communities, in particular women, youth, the most vulnerable groups like indigenous people and those hit the hardest by the COVID-19 pandemic, need to see their labour conditions, quality of life and long-term socio-economic prospects improved in the context of major transitions and rising threats to climate, resources and health. Their capacity to drive community-led innovations must be enhanced and their resilience increased across the diversity of European territories including remote places such as mountains and sparsely populated areas. Mobilising the forces of digital transformation, start-up ecosystems, nature-based solutions, as well as social and policy innovation will facilitate necessary changes and support smart, environment and climate friendly and resilient lifestyles.

Activities under this destination are complementary to Cluster 2 activities with attention to spatial differences and specifics in relation with democracy (Destination ‘Innovative research on democracy and governance’), socio-economic transformations (Destination ‘Innovative research on social and economic transformation’) and cultural heritage (Destination ‘Innovative research on the European cultural heritage and the cultural and creative industries). They are also complementary to Cluster 5’s Destination ‘Cross-sectoral solutions for the climate transition’ on cities and communities that should explore place-based approaches to climate, energy and mobility specifically for all places.

To maximise the intended impacts and to ensure uptake by the communities, actions in the cluster should aim for high standards of transparency and openness for the solutions developed, going beyond ex-post documentation of results and extending to aspects such as assumptions, processes, models and data during the life of projects.

Expected impacts

Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to resilient, inclusive, healthy and green rural, coastal and urban communities and more specifically one or several of the following expected impacts:

  • Rural, coastal and urban areas are developed in a sustainable, balanced and inclusive manner thanks to a better understanding of the environmental, socio-economic, behavioural, cultural and demographic drivers of change as well as deployment of digital, nature-based, social and community-led innovations.
  • Rural, coastal and urban communities are empowered to act for change, better prepared to achieve climate neutrality, adapt to climate change, and turn digital and ecological transitions into increased resilience to various types of shocks, good health and positive long-term prospects, including jobs, for all including women, young people and vulnerable groups.
  • Rural communities are equipped with innovative and smarter solutions that increase access to services, opportunities and adequate innovation ecosystems, including for women, youth and the most vulnerable groups, improve attractiveness and reduce the feeling of being left behind, even in the most remote locations like mountains.
  • The sustainable development of coastal areas including coastal protection and resilience reaps the benefits of social, digital and community-led innovations, to deliver nature-based and scientifically validated solutions to existing coastal socio-economic and environmental threats. In this way, applications of new social, economic and governance frameworks are enabled.
  • Tourism, recreational and leisure activity development in natural and coastal areas respects long-term environmental carrying capacity, and social goals.
  • Urban and peri-urban communities – including the most vulnerable individuals and families – can access, afford and choose healthier, nutritious and environmental-friendly food.

When considering their impact, proposals also need to assess their compliance with the “Do No Significant Harm” principle[4] according to which the research and innovation activities of the project should not be supporting or carrying out activities that make a significant harm to any of the six environmental objectives of the EU Taxonomy Regulation.

Topics under this destination will have impacts in the following impact areas of the Horizon Europe strategic plan for 2021-2024[[5]]: “Climate change mitigation and adaptation”; “Enhancing ecosystems and biodiversity on land and in water”; “Sustainable food systems from farm to fork”; “Good health and high-quality accessible healthcare”; “A resilient EU prepared for emerging threats”; “A competitive and secure data-economy”; and “Inclusive growth and new job opportunities”.

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en

[2] https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/shaping-europe-digital-future_en

[3] R&I will support the implementation of an EU-level long-term vision for rural areas to be published in the 2nd quarter of 2021.

[4] as per Article 17 of Regulation (EU) No 2020/852 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment (EU Taxonomy Regulation)

[5] Link to the strategic plan

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility conditions: described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes

 

 

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System

 

 

2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

If projects use satellite-based Earth observation, positioning, navigation and/or related timing data and services, beneficiaries must make use of Copernicus and/or Galileo/EGNOS (other data and services may additionally be used).

 

3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

 

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

  • Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes

  • Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual

  • Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes

 

Specific conditions

7. Specific conditions: described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk –  the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.  

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment– consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

 

Latest Updates

Last Changed: December 21, 2022

Flash information on the CALL results

(flash call info)

Call for proposals: Resilient, inclusive, healthy and green rural, coastal and urban communities, second-stage (HORIZON-CL6-2022- COMMUNITIES-02-two-stage)

Published: 28/10/2021

Deadline: 06/09/2022

Total budget: EUR 33.00 million

Budget per topic with separate call-budget-split’:

 

Topic code

Topic short name

Type of action

Budget
(EUR million)

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two-stage

Smart solutions for smart rural communities: empowering rural communities and smart villages to innovate for societal change

IA

14.00

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage

Developing nature-based therapy for health and well-being

RIA

19.00

 

The Commission and the Research Executive Agency have now completed the evaluation of the proposals submitted to the above-mentioned call.

The results of the evaluation are as follows:

 

Topic code

Number of submitted proposals

Number of above-threshold proposals

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two-stage

6

4

27,218,243.02 €

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage

10

9

56,095,132.50 €

TOTAL

16

13

83,313,375.52 €

 

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service[1].



[1]      Available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/enquiries

 

 
Last Changed: October 4, 2022

 Flash information on the CALL results

(flash call info)

The HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-two-stage: Resilient, inclusive, healthy and green rural, coastal and urban communities, second-stage was closed on 6th September 2022. 16 proposals were submitted in response to this call. The breakdown per topic is indicated below:

 

Topic code

Topic name

Number of submitted proposals

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01

Smart solutions for smart rural communities: empowering rural communities and smart villages to innovate for societal change

6

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02

Developing nature-based therapy for health and well-being

10

TOTAL

 

16

 

The evaluation results are expected to be communicated in December 2022.

Last Changed: June 15, 2022

GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Please remind that in your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues. 

Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts. 

Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.

Last Changed: June 15, 2022

 The Generalised feedback of both topics have been published in the topic update section

Last Changed: June 15, 2022

 GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1

In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal. 

Information & tips

Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation: 

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage

  • For some proposals, the objectives were not convincingly measurable due to the lack of appropriate measurable indicators.
  • In some proposals, the healthcare sector was not sufficiently involved in the interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral approach.
  • The crosscutting priorities on social innovation, contribution of the SSH disciplines and international cooperation were not sufficiently outlined in the proposals.
  • In several proposals, the open science practices were addressed with insufficient detail.
  • The credibility of the pathways to achieve the expected outcomes and impacts specified in the work programme was not sufficiently clear in some proposals.
Last Changed: May 31, 2022

 CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTs

 

EVALUATION results

 

Published: 06 October 2021

Deadline: 23 February 2022

Available budget: EUR 33.00 million

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two-stage: 14.00 million €

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage: 19.00 million €   

In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘excellence’ and ‘impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):

  • HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two-stage: 8.5 points
  • HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage: 8.5 points

 

 

The results of the evaluation are as follows:

 

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two-stage:

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls):24

Number of inadmissible proposals: 1 proposal

Number of ineligible proposals: 1 proposal

Number of above-threshold proposals: 6 proposals

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: 41.505.310,00 € 

HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage:

Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls):32

Number of inadmissible proposals: 0 proposal

Number of ineligible proposals: 1 proposal

Number of above-threshold proposals: 11 proposals

Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: 68.054.226,00 €

 

We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-n5VVWXljoCs/T8X1egaB-BI/AAAAAAAAC1I/fLBP4VIzxQM/s16/infoIcon_blue.png For questions, please contact: Research Enquiry Service

Last Changed: March 7, 2022

 

The HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02 (first stage) call was closed on 23 February. 56 proposals have been submitted in response to the first stage of this call. The breakdown per topic is indicated below. In the previous version there was a formatting mistake in the numbering of the topics:

·       HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two stage: 24

·       HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two stage: 32

The evaluation results are expected to be communicated to the applicants at the end of May 2022.

 

Last Changed: March 2, 2022

The HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02 (first stage) call was closed on 23 February. 56 proposals have been submitted in response to the first stage of this call. The breakdown per topic is indicated below:

·       HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-01-01: 24

·       HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-01-02: 32

The evaluation results are expected to be communicated to the applicants at the end of May 2022.

Last Changed: January 10, 2022

Please note that the call deadline for the first stage of all topics under this call has been extended to 23/02/2022, at 17:00:00 Brussels Local Time.

Last Changed: November 8, 2021
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-01-two-stage(HORIZON-IA), HORIZON-CL6-2022-COMMUNITIES-02-02-two-stage(HORIZON-RIA)
Last Changed: June 25, 2021

 

Rebuttal

This topic will be part of the ‘Right-to-react (or Rebuttal)’ pilot. If your proposal passes stage 1,  during the second stage, your full proposal will be evaluated and scored remotely by expert evaluators with respect to the evaluation criteria. A rebuttal procedure after the individual evaluation phase of the second stage will provide you with the opportunity to reply within five calendar days with a strict page limit (maximum two A4 pages) to the individual evaluators’ comments. Your replies cannot be used to alter or add to the content of the proposals, but must strictly focus on responding to potential misunderstandings or errors by the evaluators. Your replies will be made available to the expert evaluators who will consider them before finalising their final assessment in the consensus phase.

 

You will receive tentatively the rebuttal report in due time after the second stage call deadline.

 

 

Last Changed: June 16, 2021

 

Rebuttal Mechanism

 

This topic will be part of the ‘Right-to-react (or Rebuttal)’ pilot. Your proposal will be first evaluated and scored remotely by expert evaluators with respect to the evaluation criteria. A rebuttal procedure after the individual evaluation phase will provide you with the opportunity to reply within five calendar days with a strict page limit (maximum two A4 pages) to the individual evaluators’ comments. Your replies cannot be used to alter or add to the content of the proposals, but must strictly focus on responding to potential misunderstandings or errors by the evaluators. Your replies will be made available to the expert evaluators who will consider them before finalising their final assessment in the consensus phase.

 

You will receive tentatively the rebuttal report in due time after the call deadline.

 

 

 

Developing nature-based therapy for health and well-being | Grantalist