Resilient beekeeping
HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage
- Programme
- Biodiversity and ecosystem services
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- October 27, 2021
- Deadline
- February 14, 2022
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €12,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €6,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €6,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 2
- Keywords
- HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stageHORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-two-stageApicultureBiodiversity conservationClimate change adaptationConservation biology, ecology, geneticsEcology (theoretical and experimental; population, species and community level)Genetics and heredityVeterinary medicine
Description
A successful proposal will support the objective of the biodiversity strategy and the farm to fork strategy to transition to fair, healthy and resilient European agriculture, and contribute to preserve biodiversity and strengthen the resilience and sustainability of specific farming sectors. It will contribute to the impacts related to a better knowledge of the biodiversity decline and of the interrelations between biodiversity, health and climate, as well as to the practices in agriculture supporting biodiversity and other ecosystem services.
The proposed projects are expected to contribute to a better understanding of agroecosystems practices that can sustain honeybees, to enhanced preservation of honeybee genetic resources and their use in breeding, and to mitigation of impacts of beekeeping activities on wild pollinators.
- Improved resilience of beekeeping against stresses like climate change, nutritional stresses, pathogens and chemicals;
- Support to stakeholders associated with beekeeping, trade, services, monitoring and control through increased knowledge on honeybee immunity and nutrition;
- Improved capacity to deal with relevant honeybee pathogens;
- Robust evidence-based understanding of the importance of diversity within honeybee populations;
- Improved understanding of the impacts of beekeeping activities on wild pollinators and strengthened capacity to address them.
Resilience of beekeeping is important both for pollination services and for the honeybee production sector. Bees are subject to numerous biotic and abiotic stressors (e.g. loss of feed resources, exposure to various chemicals, invasive species and/or pathogens) and the impact of climate change on honeybees requires further attention. The biology of honeybees, including immunity and nutrition is still poorly understood, as is the role of genetic diversity within honeybee populations and interactions between honeybees and their environment.
The proposals will address relevant areas of research as appropriate:
- Develop technologies and strategies for beekeepers to adapt to climate change and possibly contribute to mitigate climate change, including the design of novel beehives equipment, technologies and management protocols;
- Perform baseline studies on immunity, health, nutrition, and genetic diversity and resistance of honeybees in line with their biological performance;
- Develop tools for assessing potential impacts of beekeeping on wild pollinators at landscape scale, strategies for mitigating those impacts, and tools tailored to public authorities for planning and decision-making with regard to optimal deployment of bee hives at local or regional level, taking into account among others nutrition requirements and landscape factors;
- Address at least Varroa destructor and possibly other honeybee mites, as well as Aethina tumida
- Review the key biological mechanisms of Varroa destructor, which determine its multiplication in a hive, including its potential connection with other pathogens, and identify possible novel areas to target with potential new control methods, including bee genetic resistance, especially in light of the experience and limitations of the attempts to fight it in Europe in the last decades;
- Assess the vulnerability and preparedness of the EU honeybee-keeping sector in relation to Aethina tumida and Tropilaelaps spp. which are exotic or largely exotic to the EU (A.tumida is present in southern Italy), scrutinise strategies and practices in other countries (outside of EU) where these appeared recently, identify successful practices and suggest mitigation strategies for and by the beekeepers to live with these pathogens, in case of their eventual spread in the EU.
Proposals should include, if appropriate, a genetic component, looking at both the diversity of honeybee populations and the possibility of breeding and conservation approaches to address the identified challenge.
Proposals must implement the 'multi-actor approach’ and ensure adequate involvement of beekeepers, farmers, agricultural advisory services, manufacturers, the veterinary profession, ecology and nature conservation experts, and other relevant actors.
Destination & Scope
The urgent challenges of today are inherently complex and systemic and will not be solved by individual actors or territories in isolation. To foster enabling innovation ecosystems across Europe requires a systemic approach that is inclusive and collaborative, involves diverse actors, institutions and places, maximises the value of innovation to all and ensures equitable diffusion of its benefits.
This destination offers a holistic package of actions that:
- foster the implementation of co-funded multi-annual programmes of activities among Member States, Associated Countries and EU regions;
- encourage the inclusion of more stakeholders from across the quadruple helix[1] (academia, industry, public bodies, civil society and citizens) and a wider participation of territories in existing successful initiatives and networks towards the deployment of innovation;
- stimulate innovation procurement to help the market uptake of innovative solutions and the integration of social innovation that responds to the needs of people and society.
The destination is open for any thematic area and will focus on building interconnected, inclusive innovation ecosystems across Europe by drawing on the existing strengths of national, regional and local ecosystems and encouraging the involvement of all actors and territories to set, undertake, and achieve collective ambitions towards challenges for the benefit of society, including green, digital, and social transitions and the European Research Area.
In particular, the actions under this destination should promote the creation of links:
- with all key innovation stakeholders, including the private sector, in particular between SMEs, start-ups and other innovators with investors, industry and public and/or private buyers for faster access to funds and markets and the public sector including authorities in charge of national, regional or local innovation policies and programmes and bodies responsible for smart specialisation; also between innovators with foundations, civil society organisations and citizens to ensure that the innovations match the needs values and expectations of society, thereby accelerating deployment and up-take towards tackling societal challenges and with universities and research and technology organisations (RTOs) as sources of innovation and talent;
- among ‘innovation leaders’ and ‘strong innovators’ with ‘moderate’ and ‘modest innovators’[2] across the EU and Associated Countries[3] to tackle the innovation gap[4];
- with networks such as National Contact Points, Enterprise Europe Network, social innovation networks[5], clusters, pan-European platforms such as Startup Europe, regional or local innovation actors, public but also private, in particular incubators and innovation hubs that could moreover be interconnected to favour partnering among innovators.
The applicants should consider and actively seek synergies with, and where appropriate possibilities for further funding from other relevant EU, national and/or regional innovation programmes, including Cohesion policy funds, other public and private funds or financial instruments.
Expected impact
Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to interconnected innovation ecosystems, and more specifically to the following impact:
- Interconnected, inclusive and more efficient innovation ecosystems across Europe that draws on the existing strengths of European, national, regional and local ecosystems and pulls in new, less well-represented stakeholders and less advanced in innovation territories, to set, undertake, and achieve collective ambitions towards challenges for the benefit of the society, including green, digital, and social transitions.
Proposals are invited against the following topics:
[1] A model of cooperation between industry, academia, civil society and public authorities, with a strong emphasis on citizens and their needs.
[2] References: Regional Innovation Scoreboard (RIS), European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS), Global Innovation Index (GII).
[3] Associated countries are described in General Annex B.
[4] The work programme will act in complementarity with the “Widening participation and strengthening the European Research Area” work programme.
[5] Such as the Social Innovation Community (SIC) and the PITCCH Network, funded via an INNOSUP action.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
The following additional eligibility criteria apply:
The proposals must use the multi-actor approach. See definition of the multi-actor approach in the introduction to this work programme part.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes
To ensure a balanced portfolio covering biotic and abiotic factors, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to one project within the biotic stressors (i.e. diseases) that is the highest ranked, and one project highest ranked within the abiotic stressors, if the applications attain all thresholds .
- Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes
- Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual
- Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA)
Standard evaluation form — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA)
MGA
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2021–2022 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2021–2022 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment– consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Published: 16 June 2021
Deadline: 01 September 2022
Available budget:
|
Topics |
Type of Action |
Budgets |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-01-two-stage |
IA |
€ 20,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-02-two-stage |
IA |
€ 14,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage |
RIA |
€ 12,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-01-two-stage |
IA |
€ 21,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-02-two-stage |
RIA |
€ 10,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-03-two-stage |
IA |
€ 12,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-04-two-stage |
RIA |
€ 6,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-05-two-stage |
RIA |
€ 12,000,000.00 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-06-two-stage |
IA |
€ 15,000,000.00 |
The results of the evaluation are as follows:
|
Topic Code |
Number of proposals submitted |
Number of inadmissible proposals |
Number of ineligible proposals |
Number of above-threshold proposals |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-01-two-stage |
2 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
€7,967,829.18 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-02-two-stage |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
€21,094,998.26 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage |
4 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
€17,998,863.75 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-01-two-stage |
12 |
0 |
0 |
12 |
€87,921,393.88 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-02-two-stage |
5 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
€24,994,213.50 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-03-two-stage |
9 |
0 |
0 |
9 |
€49,897,079.94 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-04-two-stage |
4 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
€23,927,473.75 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-05-two-stage |
3 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
€17,995,577.50 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-CIRCBIO-02-06-two-stage |
6 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
€44,279,286.51 |
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
CALL UPDATE: GENERALISED FEEDBACK AFTER STAGE 1
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants after STAGE 1
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Main shortcomings found in the stage 1 evaluation of topic HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage:
• To ensure a balanced portfolio covering biotic and abiotic factors, grants will be awarded to applications not only in order of ranking but at least also to fund one project within the biotic stressors (i.e. diseases) that is the highest ranked, and one project highest ranked within the abiotic stressors, if the applications attain all thresholds. Proposals should indicate what the stressors addressed are (i.e. biotic, abiotic, both) at the beginning of the text.
• The description of the foreseen methodology does not always present a sufficient level of details, e.g. how the methodology covers the proposal’s objectives, details of the procedures and the reasoning behind, etc… The methodology should be better described, including sufficient details.
• Some of the expected outcomes set out in the call text are addressed superficially, providing only general information on how they will be achieved without sufficient detail, quantification and/or justification. Proposals should correctly and precisely (not in a superficial way) address the relevant expected outcomes set out in the call text, sufficiently explaining how the results expected to be generated by the project may lead towards them in an adequate and consistent way.
• The proposal should follow the proposals’ template. The proposal should address criteria and sub-criteria in the appropriate place in the proposal, to make it clear to the evaluators that the issues have been addressed.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
EVALUATION results
Published: 06 October 2021
Deadline: 15 February 2022
Available budget:
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-01-two-stage : €20.000.000,00
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-02-two-stage : €14.000.000,00
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage : €12.000.000,00
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):
- HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-01-two-stage (European partnership rescuing biodiversity to safeguard life on Earth): 8.5 points
- HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-02-two-stage (Boosting breeding for a sustainable, resilient and competitive European legume sector): 8 points
- HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage (Resilient beekeeping): 8 points
The results of the evaluation are as follows:
|
Topic Id |
Number of ineligible proposals: |
Number of above-threshold proposals: |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls): |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals: |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-01-two-stage |
1 |
2 |
4 |
17.900.000,00 € |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-02-two-stage |
1 |
3 |
4 |
21.000.000,00 € |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage |
2 |
4 |
13 |
23.948.342,00 € |
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-two-stage_stage1 has closed on the 15th of February 2022.
21 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
|
Topic |
Proposals received |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-03-two-stage |
13 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-01-two-stage |
4 |
|
HORIZON-CL6-2022-BIODIV-02-02-two-stage |
4 |
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in May 2022