Advanced biomaterials for the Health Care (IA)
HORIZON Innovation Actions
Basic Information
- Identifier
- HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36
- Programme
- RESILIENT VALUE CHAINS 2024 TWO STAGE
- Programme Period
- 2021 - 2027
- Status
- Closed (31094503)
- Opening Date
- September 18, 2023
- Deadline
- February 6, 2024
- Deadline Model
- two-stage
- Budget
- €31,000,000
- Min Grant Amount
- €6,000,000
- Max Grant Amount
- €8,000,000
- Expected Number of Grants
- 4
- Keywords
- HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGEChemical engineeringMaterials engineeringMedical biotechnologyMedical engineeringNano-technology
Description
This topic refers to the innovation market for Healthcare and Medicine, which affects many citizens and their needs. Several materials specifications and related innovations needs will support this topic such as renewable and recyclable materials, alternative active ingredients, design for circularity, lightweight materials. The topic should address several key policies of the European Union such as Circular Economy Action Plan, EU Chemicals strategy.
Projects are expected to contribute to the following outcomes:
- Develop the swiftly growing innovation market of medical applications, which is dependent on advanced biocompatible materials that can be printed or injected, including 4D materials that change their 3D structures following external impact (e.g. thermic, electric, mechanical or radiation treatment).
- Medical and/or surgical procedures will benefit from injectable materials for non-invasive surgical procedures.
- Some of their advantages include easy deliverability into the body, increased implantation precision, controllable release of therapeutic agents, antimicrobial properties and the possibility of monitoring or stimulating biological events.
Medical suppliers can commercialise injectable hydrogels, including those made of nanocomposite, natural and synthetic polymer-based biomaterials, bone cements, bio-ceramics and electronics.
Scope:Proposals should address at least four of the following activities:
- To enable a fast development of new advanced novel injectable biomaterials, digital tools such as modelling, simulation and characterisation techniques (including those provided by analytical infrastructures) assisted by advanced methods e.g. physics-based methods, machine learning or artificial intelligence.
- The innovation market of medical applications is fast growing and dependent on advanced biocompatible materials that can be printed or injected. The 4D materials will change their 3D structures after external impact such as thermic, electric, mechanical or radiation treatment.
- Proposals shall demonstrate new engineering strategies that present functional characteristics beyond bio-compatibility, and express properties that can be used to control the physiological environment (shape-memory, self-healing properties) and induce a response.
- Proposals shall address biomaterials with antibacterial properties contributing to the widespread bottleneck of antimicrobial resistance often encountered in clinical care
- Demonstrate the scaling of injectable hydrogels, including those made of nanocomposite, natural and synthetic polymer-based biomaterials, bone cements, bio-ceramics and electronics.
- The design for circularity has to develop, when relevant, bio-degradable or bio-absorbable biomaterials that are gradually eliminated by the body after fulfilling a purpose.
The biomaterials used should be safe and sustainable by design (SSbD), taking also into account any specific medical requirements.
Proposals submitted under this topic should include a business case and exploitation strategy, as outlined in the introduction to this Destination.
This topic requires the effective contribution of SSH disciplines and the involvement of SSH experts, institutions as well as the inclusion of relevant SSH expertise, in order to produce meaningful and significant effects enhancing the societal impact of the related research activities. An early involvement of end users could be essential.
Projects should build on or seek collaboration with existing projects and develop synergies with other relevant European, national or regional initiatives, funding programmes and platforms.#
Where relevant, proposals should seek links with and capitalise on the results of past and ongoing EU funded research projects, including the ones under Cluster 1 “Health” and Cluster 6 'Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture and Environment.
Destination & Scope
This destination will directly support the following Key Strategic Orientations (KSOs), as outlined in the Strategic Plan[1]:
- KSO C, ‘Making Europe the first digitally-enabled circular, climate-neutral and sustainable economy through the transformation of its mobility, energy, construction and production systems’
- KSO A, ‘Promoting an open strategic autonomy by leading the development of key digital, enabling and emerging technologies, sectors and value chains to accelerate and steer the digital and green transitions through human-centred technologies and innovations’
- KSO D, ‘Creating a more resilient, inclusive and democratic European society, prepared and responsive to threats and disasters, addressing inequalities and providing high-quality health care, and empowering all citizens to act in the green and digital transitions.
Proposals for topics under this Destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to the following expected impact of Cluster 4:
- Industrial leadership and increased autonomy in key strategic value chains with security of supply in raw materials, achieved through breakthrough technologies in areas of industrial alliances, dynamic industrial innovation ecosystems and advanced solutions for substitution, resource and energy efficiency, effective reuse and recycling and clean primary production of raw materials, including critical raw materials, and leadership in the circular economy.
The COVID-19 crisis, the war against Ukraine and other crises have shown that global competitiveness and resilience are two sides of the same coin. Resilience is about more than the ability to withstand and cope with shocks; it is an opportunity to undergo transitions in a sustainable and fair way. As the European Union and Associated Countries gear up to becoming a climate-neutral, circular and competitive economy by 2050, resilience will require paying attention to new vulnerabilities as entire sectors undergo deep transformations while creating opportunities for Europe’s industry to develop its own markets, products and services which boost competitiveness.
Research and innovation will be fundamental to spur industrial leadership, enhanced sustainability and resilience. It will support the modernisation of traditional industrial models while developing novel technologies, business models and processes. This should enhance the flexibility of the EU’s industrial base, and increase its resilience by reducing EU dependencies on third countries for critical raw materials and technologies.
The most relevant policies of the European Commission on this front are:
- The European Industrial Strategy of March 2020, and in particular the Update of May 2021: there is now a renewed momentum in the EU to tackle its strategic dependencies as well as to boost its resilience across key strategic areas. The Covid-19 crisis revealed the importance of improving production response and preparedness of EU industry, in support of its long-term competitiveness. The Industrial Strategy Update and the accompanying Staff Working Document on strategic dependencies, showed that 99 products in the most sensitive ecosystems included materials on the list of critical raw materials.
- The Circular Economy Action Plan of March 2020 announced initiatives along the entire life cycle of products. It targets how products are designed, promotes circular economy processes, encourages sustainable consumption, and aims to ensure that waste is prevented and resources used are kept in the EU economy for as long as possible.
- The Chemicals Strategy for Sustainability of October 2020 strategy aims to better protect citizens and the environment whilst boosting the innovation for safe and sustainable chemicals. It calls for actions in the frame of research and innovation to develop a Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSdB) framework and criteria and a Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda addressing research and innovation needs raised in the Strategy and beyond.
- The Zero Pollution Action Plan of May 2021 set’s out the objective that by 2050 air, water and soil pollution shall be reduced to levels no longer considered harmful to health and natural ecosystems, that respect the boundaries of the planet. The action plan aims to strengthen the EU green, digital and economic leadership, whilst creating a healthier, socially fairer Europe and planet. It provides a compass to mainstream pollution prevention in all relevant EU policies, to step up implementation of the relevant EU legislation and to identify possible gaps.
- The Materials 2030 Roadmap, presented by a large group of stakeholders, will enable the green and digital transition, anchoring on good design principles, combined with synergies between advanced materials, circularity, digital and industrial technologies. It calls for the evolution of materials research by uniting digital and material capacities and competences, combining technology push with market pull and united actions at Member States level, to benefit from Europe’s strength.
- The Digital Decade of March 2021, where the Commission presented a vision, targets and avenues for a successful digital transformation of Europe by 2030.
- The Fit for 55 Package of July 2021, delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the way to climate neutrality, given the process industries’ 20% share of global greenhouse gas emissions.
The topics serving the objectives of this destination are structured as follows:
- Raw Materials for EU open strategic autonomy and successful transition to a climate-neutral and circular economy
Since the Work Programme 2021-22 was drafted, strategic dependencies have increased in importance, given their prominence in accelerating and delivering the green and digital transformation of the EU’s key industrial ecosystems, as well as the objective of supporting a more resilient European industry. The transition of the European industrial ecosystems is dependent on the supply of raw materials (both from primary and secondary sources) as many digital and green technologies rely on this supply. The focus in this Work Programme is on Diversifying the international supply chains of critical raw materials; and on Developing internal capacity for primary and secondary raw materials production.
- Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) chemicals and materials
Safe and Sustainable by Design (SSbD) is an approach to the design, development and use of chemicals and materials that focuses on providing a function (or service), while reducing harmful impacts to human health and the environment. The Commission published a framework and criteria for Safe and Sustainable chemicals and materials in 2022. Projects across Horizon Europe developing new chemicals or materials are expected to adhere to the framework as of this Work Programme.
Under Horizon 2020 a series of research projects were funded aimed to define and implement a Safe-by-Design concept for nanomaterials. This generated a knowledge base that serves as the foundation for the SSbD concept, which is now a key feature of the Chemical Strategy for Sustainability. The new SSbD concept covers chemicals and materials, including advanced materials and therefore nanomaterials.
The focus on this work programme is on extending the portfolio of methods and models applicable in the SSbD framework as well as on the actual application of the framework to develop SSbD alternatives to substances of concern. Projects resulting from the SSbD topics are expected to contribute to extending the available scientific knowledge base for regulations and policy making.
- Strategic Innovation Markets driven by Advanced Materials
Materials, in particular advanced materials, are not only the backbone and source of prosperity of the European society. They will also play a decisive and enabling role in the twin green and digital transition. The Materials2030 Roadmap highlighted that innovation markets are the industrial perspective presenting the “market pull” to address societal needs and challenges under a long-term perspective. The focus in this Work Programme is on a systemic approach to develop the next generation solution-oriented advanced materials, which will offer faster, scalable and efficient responses to the societal and technological challenges, that are relevant and can be considered as opportunities for Europe’s society, economy and environment today and over the next three decades. The competition for critical raw materials (CRMs) Europe’s open strategic autonomy at risk in key technologies of the twin green and digital transition. Advanced materials may mitigate these risks by replacing or substituting CRMs.
Moreover, this Work Programme addresses data exchange and interoperability in materials modelling and characterisation across value chains, to support the green and digital transformation of European industry.
- Improving the resilience of EU businesses, especially SMEs and Startups
EU companies, in particular SMEs, need to have capabilities to respond in an agile and effective way to supply disruption, but also to be better equipped for dealing with such shocks in the future.
Business cases and exploitation strategies for industrialisation: This section applies only to those topics in this Destination, for which proposals should demonstrate the expected impact by including a business case and exploitation strategy for industrialisation.
The business case should demonstrate the expected impact of the proposal in terms of enhanced market opportunities for the participants and deployment in the EU, in the short to medium term. It should describe the targeted market(s); estimated market size in the EU and globally; user and customer needs; and demonstrate that the solutions will match the market and user needs in a cost-effective manner; and describe the expected market position and competitive advantage.
The exploitation strategy should identify obstacles, requirements and necessary actions involved in reaching higher TRLs (Technology Readiness Levels), for example: matching value chains, enhancing product robustness; securing industrial integrators; and user acceptance.
For TRL 7, a credible strategy to achieve future full-scale deployment in the EU is expected, indicating the commitments of the industrial partners after the end of the project.
Where relevant, in the context of skills, it is recommended to develop training material to endow workers with the right skillset in order to support the uptake and deployment of new innovative products, services, and processes developed in the different projects. This material should be tested and be scalable, and can potentially be up-scaled through the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+). This will help the European labour force to close the skill gaps in the relevant sectors and occupational groups and improve employment and social levels across the EU and associated countries.
In order to achieve the expected outcomes, for particular topics international cooperation is not mandatory but advised with some regions or countries, to get internationally connected and add additional specific expertise and value to the activities.
To achieve wider effects activities beyond R&I investments will be needed. Wider activities include the further development of skills and competencies (also via the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, in particular EIT Raw Materials, EIT Climate-KIC and EIT Digital); and the use of financial products under the InvestEU Fund for further commercialisation of R&I outcomes.
Synergies:
For raw materials, there are synergies with energy-intensive industries and in particular the circularity part; and with strategic innovation markets driven by advanced materials. A further synergy is with Cluster 5: Renewable energies and energy storage.
Safe and Sustainable by Design presents synergies with
Cluster 6 ‘Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture’ in areas Bio-based Innovation Systems in the EU Bioeconomy and Circular Systems;
Cluster 5 ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’ in view of areas on lightweight materials;
Cluster 1 ‘Health’, Destination ‘Living and working in a health-promoting environment: research on impact of chemicals on human health’; and
Horizon Europe Partnership on the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC): on exposure and hazard activities as well as the SSbD toolbox and case studies.
Strategic Innovation Markets driven by Advanced Materials presents synergies with the energy-intensive and manufacturing industries, in view of both the circularity approaches and low-carbon technologies; and with
Cluster 1 ‘Health’, in view of areas on bio-based materials;
Cluster 5 ‘Climate, Energy and Mobility’ in view of areas on lightweight materials;
Cluster 6 ‘Food, Bioeconomy, Natural Resources, Agriculture’ in view of areas on agrochemicals.
While focusing exclusively on civilian applications, there may be synergies with actions conducted under the European Defence Fund (EDF) or its precursor programmes (Preparatory Action on Defence Research and European Defence Industry Development Programme), notably in the field of advanced sensing and advanced materials.
Innovation Actions — Legal entities established in China are not eligible to participate in Innovation Actions in any capacity. Please refer to the Annex B of the General Annexes of this Work Programme for further details.
[1] Whilst Cluster 4 addresses KSOs A, C and D, KSO B is becoming increasingly important, given the role of the industry highlighted in the zero-pollution action plan.
Eligibility & Conditions
General conditions
Applicants submitting a proposal under the blind evaluation pilot (see General Annex F) must not disclose their organisation names, acronyms, logos, nor names of personnel in Part B of their first stage application (see General Annex E).
In order to include a business case and exploitation strategy, the page limit in General Annex A of the General Annexes is exceptionally extended by 3 pages.
2. Eligible countries: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.
3. Other eligibility conditions: described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.
4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion: described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.
This topic is part of the blind evaluation pilot under which first stage proposals will be evaluated blindly.
-
Award criteria, scoring and thresholds are described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.
-
Submission and evaluation processes are described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.
-
Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement: described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025). [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].
6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants: described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.
Specific conditions
7. Specific conditions: described in the specific topic of the Work Programme.
Documents
Call documents:
Standard application form (HE RIA, IA) — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard application form (HE RIA IA Stage 1) — call-specific application form is available in the Submission System
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA) — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Standard evaluation form (HE RIA, IA and CSA Stage 1) — will be used with the necessary adaptations
Lump Sum MGA v1.0 — MGA
Additional documents:
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 1. General Introduction
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 7. Digital, Industry and Space
HE Main Work Programme 2023–2024 – 13. General Annexes
HE Framework Programme and Rules for Participation Regulation 2021/695
HE Specific Programme Decision 2021/764
Rules for Legal Entity Validation, LEAR Appointment and Financial Capacity Assessment
EU Grants AGA — Annotated Model Grant Agreement
Funding & Tenders Portal Online Manual
Support & Resources
Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.
Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.
CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.
Latest Updates
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGE
EVALUATION results, STAGE 2
Published: 07.12.2022
Deadline stage 1: 07.02.2024, Deadline stage 2: 24.09.2024
Available call budget: EUR 62,000,000
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-35 | HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36 | |
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) | 13 | 15 |
Number of inadmissible proposals | 0 | 0 |
Number of ineligible proposals | 0 | 0 |
Number of above-threshold proposals | 13 | 14 |
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals, EUR | 94,655,679.40 € | 103,726,780.37 € |
Number of proposals retained for funding | 4 | 4 |
Number of proposals in the reserve list | 2 | 2 |
Funding threshold 1 | 13.5 | 14.5 |
Ranking distribution (above-threshold proposals): | ||
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 15 and higher or equal to 14 | 3 | 6 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 14 and higher or equal to 13 | 3 | 4 |
Number of proposals with scores lower than 13 and higher or equal to 10 | 7 | 4 |
1 Proposals with the same score were ranked according to the priority order procedure set out in the call conditions (for HE, in the General Annexes to the Work Programme or specific arrangements in the specific call/topic conditions).
Summary of observer report:
The Independent Observer concludes that consensus meetings and panel meetings, and in overall evaluation procedures were carried with transparency, efficiency, fairness, consistency, impartiality, by applying homogenous criteria in compliance with the applicable evaluation rules for each phase of the selection exercise (individual evaluation reports, consensus reports, proposal cross-reading, panel ranking). The evaluation process was carried out in full accordance with the Horizon Europe documents on proposal evaluation.
IT systems SEP and CIRCABC worked very well, and they were clear and useful for the evaluation procedures and provided supporting documents to help the expert’s work. Webex IT tool was used for the meetings, and it worked very well permitting a good interaction level for the experts during their discussion about each evaluated proposal.
In this way, all the procedures to select the best proposals were very adequate to define the final ranking in order to select the best projects to be funded according to the call indication.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS
PROPOSAL NUMBERS
Call HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGE (stage 2) has closed on the 24/09/2024.
28 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic is:
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-35: 13 proposals
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36: 15 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in 3rd week of December 2024.
General reminder:
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
Proposal part B page limit:
The title, list of participants and sections 1, 2 and 3, together, should not be longer than 53 pages. All tables, figures, references and any other element pertaining to these sections must be included as an integral part of these sections and are thus counted against this page limit.
The page limit will be applied automatically. At the end of this document you can see the structure of the actual proposal that you need to submit, please remove all instruction pages that are watermarked.
If you attempt to upload a proposal longer than the specified limit before the deadline, you will receive an automatic warning and will be advised to shorten and re-upload the proposal. After the deadline, excess pages (in over-long proposals/applications) will be automatically made invisible, and will not be taken into consideration by the experts. The proposal is a self-contained document. Experts will be instructed to ignore hyperlinks to information that is specifically designed to expand the proposal, thus circumventing the page limit.
Please, do not consider the page limit as a target! It is in your interest to keep your text as concise as possible, since experts rarely view unnecessarily long proposals in a positive light.
Proposal part B formatting conditions:
The following formatting conditions apply.
The reference font for the body text of proposals is Times New Roman (Windows platforms), Times/Times New Roman (Apple platforms) or Nimbus Roman No. 9 L (Linux distributions).
The use of a different font for the body text is not advised and is subject to the cumulative conditions that the font is legible and that its use does not significantly shorten the representation of the proposal in number of pages compared to using the reference font (for example with a view to bypass the page limit).
The minimum font size allowed is 11 points. Standard character spacing and a minimum of single line spacing is to be used. This applies to the body text, including text in tables.
Text elements other than the body text, such as headers, foot/end notes, captions, formula's, may deviate, but must be legible.
The page size is A4, and all margins (top, bottom, left, right) should be at least 15 mm (not including any footers or headers).
This document is tagged. Do not delete the tags; they are needed for our internal processing of information, mostly for statistical gathering. In that light, please do not move, delete, re-order, alter tags in any way, as they might create problems in our internal processing tools. Tags do not affect or influence the outcome of your application.
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants
after STAGE 1
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGE, 1 stage
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Main shortcomings found in the proposals evaluated in Stage 1.
TOPIC HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-36
" ADVANCED BIOMATERIALS FOR THE HEALTH CARE "
Objectives
· Measurability and verifiability of objectives could be further improved.
· The State-of-the-Art (SoA) can be further elaborated in full proposals, which will not be anonymous.
· The progress from start to target Technology Readiness Level should be further elaborated.
Methodology
· When Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) is proposed, the technical robustness of the AI system should be explained sufficiently.
· Integration of expertise from different disciplines should be more robust.
· Implementation of open science practices needs to be more integral in proposed methodologies.
· Effective contribution of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) should be better addressed.
· Sufficient evidence should be provided, showing that proposals will build on or seek collaboration with existing projects and develop synergies with other relevant European, national or regional initiatives, funding programmes and platforms.
· Gender dimension incorporation in research and innovation content requires further elaboration.
Impact
· Contribution credibility towards expected outcomes and wider impacts requires strengthening.
· Quantification and estimation of project's scale and significance of contributions needs further explanation.
· Identification of potential barriers to expected impacts and outcomes should be elaborated further.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues as full proposals are not anonymous anymore.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
CALL UPDATE: FLASH EVALUATION RESULTS
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGE, 1 stage
EVALUATION RESULTS
Published: 07.12.2022
Deadline: 07.02.2024
Available budget: EUR 62,000,000
In accordance with General Annex F of the Work Programme, the evaluation of the first-stage proposals was made looking only at the criteria ‘Excellence’ and ‘Impact’. The threshold for both criteria was 4. The overall threshold (applying to the sum of the two individual scores) was set for each topic/type of action with separate call-budget-split at a level that allowed the total requested budget of proposals admitted to stage 2 be as close as possible to 3 times the available budget (and not below 2.5 times the budget):
· HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-35 (Biodegradable polymers for sustainable packaging materials): 9 points
· HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36 (Advanced biomaterials for the Health Care): 10 points
The results of the evaluation for each topic are as follows:
|
|
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-35 |
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36 |
|
Number of proposals submitted (including proposals transferred from or to other calls) |
41 |
91 |
|
Number of inadmissible proposals |
0 |
4 |
|
Number of ineligible proposals |
0 |
1 |
|
Number of above-threshold proposals |
13 |
15 |
|
Total budget requested for above-threshold proposals |
100,060,918.57 € |
113,423,165 € |
|
Number of proposals in the reserve list |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Ranking distribution: |
|
|
|
Number of proposals with scores lower or equal to 10 and higher or equal to 9 |
13 |
27 |
|
Number of proposals with scores lower than 9 and higher or equal to 8 |
8 |
17 |
Summary of observer report:
The Independent observer (IO) finds that the evaluation followed the applicable rules for the call, and that it was competently evaluated in a fair and equitable manner by both the experts and Agency staff. The IO did not observe any event or activity that gave rise to specific concern that might have jeopardised the fairness of the evaluation. The IO understands that the experts were comfortable with the process and the schedule, and many expressed support for the blind evaluation process, which would encourage new participation and reduce unintentional bias.
We recently informed the applicants about the evaluation results for their proposals.
For questions, please contact the Research Enquiry Service.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
GENERALISED FEEDBACK for successful applicants
after STAGE 1
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGE, 1 stage
In order to best ensure equal treatment, successful stage 1 applicants do not receive the evaluation summary reports (ESRs) for their proposals, but this generalised feedback with information and tips for preparing the full proposal.
Information & tips
Main shortcomings found in the proposals evaluated in Stage 1.
TOPIC HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-35
" BIODEGRADABLE POLYMERS FOR SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING MATERIALS "
Clarity and Pertinence of Objectives
· Most of the objectives are measurable and verifiable, with specific key performance indicators (KPIs) outlined. However, some benchmarks and baseline levels are not sufficiently detailed.
· Realistic achievability of some objectives is not clearly demonstrated.
· Starting TRLs of some key technologies and the credibility of achieveing target TRL levels are not explained in sufficient detail.
Soundness of methodology
· The scientific methodology is not always clear and robust. The description of the underlying concepts, models and assumptions is not addressed in sufficient detail.
· The methodological aspects regarding the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) are not sufficiently detailed to demonstrate technical robustness.
· In some cases integration of expertise from various disciplines is not fully described.
· Open science practices are followed but lack some details.
· The data management and data storage are insufficiently described particularly the data handling, storage and sharing between partners.
· The role of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) disciplines is not well integrated.
· Gender dimension considerations are insufficient.
· In some proposals the risk analysis from an environmental perspective is not convincingly addressed.
· Collaborations and synergies with existing projects are underdeveloped. Specific actions to enforce this collaborations are not clearly demonstrated.
Impact Assessment
· The credibility of the pathways to achieve expected outcomes and impacts in some proposals is insufficiently described, particularly how the overall impact would be scaled up. Contributions to wider impacts in terms of achieving increased autonomy in key value chains are not explained in sufficient detail.
· Potential barriers to outcomes and impacts are not consistently identified and mitigated. Some potential barriers are identified, and adequate measures are proposed, along with some generic mitigation procedures. However, the costs, risks associated with 'alternative pathways for material sourcing,' suply chains, R&I-related technological barriers, and economic barriers and their mitigations are not sufficiently described.
· Negative environmental impacts and their management are often overlooked.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues as full proposals are not anonymous anymore.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
TOPIC HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-36
" ADVANCED BIOMATERIALS FOR THE HEALTH CARE "
Objectives
· Measurability and verifiability of objectives could be further improved.
· The State-of-the-Art (SoA) can be further elaborated in full proposals, which will not be anonymous.
· The progress from start to target Technology Readiness Level should be further elaborated.
Methodology
· When Artificial Intelligence (AI) and/or Machine Learning (ML) is proposed, the technical robustness of the AI system should be explained sufficiently.
· Integration of expertise from different disciplines should be more robust.
· Implementation of open science practices needs to be more integral in proposed methodologies.
· Effective contribution of Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) should be better addressed.
· Sufficient evidence should be provided, showing that proposals will build on or seek collaboration with existing projects and develop synergies with other relevant European, national or regional initiatives, funding programmes and platforms.
· Gender dimension incorporation in research and innovation content requires further elaboration.
Impact
· Contribution credibility towards expected outcomes and wider impacts requires strengthening.
· Quantification and estimation of project's scale and significance of contributions needs further explanation.
· Identification of potential barriers to expected impacts and outcomes should be elaborated further.
In your stage 2 proposal, you have a chance to address or clarify these issues as full proposals are not anonymous anymore.
Please bear in mind that your full proposal will now be evaluated more in-depth and possibly by a new group of outside experts.
Please make sure that your full proposal is consistent with your short outline proposal. It may NOT differ substantially. The project must stay the same.
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Call HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-TWO-STAGE_stage1 was closed on 07/02/2024.
132 proposals have been submitted.
The breakdown per topic:
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-35: 41 proposals
HORIZON-CL4-2024-RESILIENCE-01-36: 91 proposals
Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in the 2nd half of June 2024.