Closed

The autocratic appeal: nature, drivers and strategies

HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions

Basic Information

Identifier
HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-07
Programme
Culture, Creativity and Inclusive Society - 2025
Programme Period
2021 - 2027
Status
Closed (31094503)
Opening Date
May 15, 2025
Deadline
September 16, 2025
Deadline Model
single-stage
Budget
€10,500,000
Min Grant Amount
€3,000,000
Max Grant Amount
€3,500,000
Expected Number of Grants
3
Keywords
HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-07HORIZON-CL2-2025-01Political sciencePolitical systems and institutions, governancePolitical theory

Description

Expected Outcome:

Projects should contribute to all of the following expected outcomes:

  • Policymakers, public authorities and citizens at large are equipped with updated and exploitable scientific knowledge (including through SSH disciplines and fields) and understanding of the increasing autocratic tendencies, also in established democracies, including digital authoritarianism and erosion of human rights, as well as of the factors contributing to the rise of these tendencies (including the spread of disinformation in the public sphere, public disparagement of the rule of law, excessive use of police force, demonization of political opposition...).
  • Public authorities, journalists and publics alike are provided with methods and tools capable of a) early warning and characterisation of autocratic tendencies, their drivers and strategies; and b) identifying tactics for resisting and combating them.
  • Relevant actors (democratic governments, media, civil society organisations) are enabled to take more informed decisions when engaging and dealing with autocracies.
Scope:

In many parts of the world, democracies are under attack. Reports and indicators[1] confirm that we are in an ongoing wave of autocratisation, with the number of autocracies increasing steadily since around the turn of the century. Instead of the announced “end of history” through the triumph of the liberal democratic order, authoritarianism seems to have gained appeal while the democratisation wave rolls back. The ongoing invasion of a democratic European country by an authoritarian regime is just one token, and consequence, of the current autocratisation wave.

How does autocracy work in the twenty-first century? Why does authoritarianism continue to spread, not only as an alternative to, but also within liberal democracy, where populist leaders frequently deploy authoritarian tactics and practices, weakening and eroding the rule of law from the inside, while continuing to gain strength and popularity? The growing acceptance of autocratic approaches in well-functioning established democracies is an under-researched phenomenon, and therefore scientific knowledge and understanding of those tendencies could contribute to the development of tools to counteract them. Social and psychological aspects, as well as philosophical and historical dimensions, will need to be considered for such an analysis. Historical experiences with autocratic regimes can shed light on commonalities and differences, so that the lessons from the past underpin current analysis and responses.

Resistance against autocratisation requires also further investigation. While not overlooking structural pre-conditions, patterns of autocratisation, as well as the motivations and strategies used by authoritarian actors, the research to be funded should also look at the actors resisting autocratisation and their strategies, investigating the modalities, actors and patterns of resistance against processes of autocratisation, so as to generate updated and exploitable scientific knowledge on this field. Could media literacy, culture, creativity and arts, for instance, play a role in stemming autocratic tendencies[2]? What role is left to LGBTIQ people and religious, migrant or ethnic minorities, usually targeted by autocrats and populist leaders, in the resistance playbook against autocracies? Could the heteronormative and whitewashing activities of autocracies, visible in different domains such as culture and arts, entertainment industry, tourism or sports, be also resisted and counteracted?

Particularly striking, among those strategies to distract from persistent authoritarian practices, is the adoption of gender-equality reforms by some autocracies to boost their international image. While increased autocracy and anti-democratic tendencies go hand in hand with the global setback on gender equality and sexual and reproductive health and rights, proposals should not overlook the causes and consequences of autocracies’ pursuit of gender equality. This will shed light on the overall patterns and drivers of autocracies in the twenty-first century.

The resistance against autocratisation tendencies has also moved into the digital realm, in order to counteract the “digital authoritarianism”[3] to which authoritarian and authoritarian-leaning leaders have resorted to. In the digital age, authoritarian power is built and sustained in transnational and globalized configurations that involve state and non-state actors, cutting across regime types. Via online censorship, internet shutdowns, digital surveillance and online disinformation and information manipulation, aspiring autocrats try to silence and disable access to information. Proposals should aim at disentangling the actor configurations engaged in digital authoritarian practices and investigate how these practices fit within the larger authoritarian playbook. In parallel, they should also focus on the challenges brought by resistance to digital authoritarianism, such as protests and investigative research and advocacy, enriching the analysis of the resistance playbook.

Proposals should investigate how to effectively protect democracies from autocratic tendencies and narratives. What means and strategies for protection are at the disposal of different stakeholders (public authorities, civil society organisations, media, citizens)? How can autocratic reforms be reversed and overcome without resorting to anti-democratic means (e.g. party bans, presidential executive orders, censoring) nor inducing large protests leading to increased polarisation?

Proposals could also look into the interrelations between the phenomena of science scepticism and science-denial, distrust in democracies and the autocratic appeal. Proposals should adopt a multidisciplinary, and actor-based, approach, integrating fields such as political science, law, sociology, philosophy, psychology, media and digital studies, gender studies, and history. Proposals should engage citizens, civil society organisations etc. in the development of their activities to ensure calibration and uptake.

The rise of autocracies and populisms in Europe is not an isolated phenomenon and needs to be looked at within a global context. Therefore, international cooperation is encouraged.

Proposals are encouraged to seek collaboration whenever possible with relevant projects selected under previous EU-funded calls, such as HORIZON-CL2-2022-DEMOCRACY-01-05, under Horizon Europe, or GOVERNANCE-03-2018, SU-GOVERNANCE-09-2020 and SU-GOVERNANCE-11-2018, under Horizon 2020. Clustering and cooperation with other selected projects under this topic and other relevant projects are strongly encouraged.

[1] For instance, those from the annual Democracy Reports published by the Varieties of Democracy Institute.

[2] The Annex to the Council Resolution on the EU Work Plan for Culture 2023-2026 (2022/C 466/01) states for instance that “cultural co-creation can authentically underpin and credibly communicate our European values, including artistic liberties and cultural rights, in large parts of the world, and thus help contain the reach of authoritarian systems.”

[3] Understood as the practices that rely on digital technologies to prevent critical debate and accountability demands to powerholders by disrupting information flows and free expression and/or by using digital technologies to surveil citizens, activists, civil society organisations.

Destination & Scope

Resilient and strengthened democratic systems, anchored in robust and inclusive political decision-making, will be fundamental in the context of complex and interconnected challenges and threats our citizens and societies are confronted with. As stated in the Political Guidelines for the European Commission 2024-2029, “Europe’s future in a fractured world will depend on having a strong democracy and on defending the values that give us the freedoms and rights that we cherish.”[1]

The Strategic Foresight Report 2023[2] already recalled how “disenfranchisement, growing discontent, and the lack of a positive agenda combine into an erosion of trust in public institutions, polarisation, and an enhanced appeal of extremist, autocratic, or populist movements” and how “democracy is increasingly challenged as the governance model best suited to deal with growing socio-economic issues.” The report acknowledged that even “in the EU, some of the core requirements for a functioning democracy are impaired.” A democratic impairment manifested in several phenomena like “challenges to the rule of law, and an increasing silent citizenship, e.g. a consistent decrease of electoral turnout in many Member States in both national and European elections, or the growing lack of interest in general democratic life [...] the personalisation of politics, with political leaders considered more important than political parties, […] polarisation of the political debate and the sense of isolation […] amplified by mis- and disinformation, group dynamics in social media, or algorithmic bias.”

Social sciences and humanities research is critical for effectively addressing those challenges. While science will provide knowledge, insights and theoretical frameworks, the involvement of stakeholders on the ground (community organisations, policymakers, civil society representatives, among others) is determinant for facilitating the uptake and impact of research results and therefore encouraged in this destination. This collaborative approach ensures that research is based on real-world experiences and needs, leading to more effective and relevant outcomes.

By addressing key societal challenges through this inclusive methodology, the impact of research on citizens’ lives will be enhanced. For instance, promoting gender equality and protecting minority rights are not only academic endeavours but necessities that reinforce social cohesion and justice. Research findings can shape legislation, drive social innovations, and support the development of initiatives that directly benefit communities. Research contributes to the development of democratic systems that are more inclusive, flexible and adaptable to change. By considering a wide range of views and experiences, policies and institutions are better able to address the needs of all citizens, increasing social fairness.

Expected impact:

Proposals for topics under this destination should set out a credible pathway to contributing to the following expected impact of the Horizon Europe Strategic Plan:

  • Reinvigorating democratic governance by improving the accountability, transparency, effectiveness and trustworthiness of institutions and policies based on rule of law, and through the expansion of active and inclusive citizens’ participation and engagement empowered by the safeguarding of fundamental rights.

The aim of the research investment supporting this impact is to develop a robust evidence base on which to build effective, relevant and sensitive policies that bolster the resilience of democratic systems and protect them from threats.

The expected impact will be achieved by generating new knowledge and understanding, and developing strategies, methods and innovative solutions, as well as policy recommendations, under the following three areas:

  1. GLOBAL CHALLENGES - Fostering democracy and promoting EU values in times of geopolitical shifts and global poly-crisis, including: effectiveness of science diplomacy as a way to strengthen multilateral cooperation; balancing ethical foreign policy with economic and security interests in foreign countries; disinformation and Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (FIMI), as a tool of warfare; EU enlargement and neighbourhood policies to better understand the mechanisms to promote democratisation and the attainment of the EU acquis, fundamental values and the rule of law.
  2. RESILIENT DEMOCRACIES – Increasing the resilience of democracy in the face of external and internal threats, including: nature of extremism and drivers of radicalisation, polarisation and hate speech, (such as xenophobia, racism or misogyny); autocratic and anti-democratic tendencies in the EU; violence and conflict in society with a focus on politically motivated violence (incl. antisemitism); balance between protecting free speech and implementing necessary regulation of it; public misconceptions towards EU enlargement.
  3. AGILE INSTITUTIONS & INCLUSIVE SOCIETIES – Modernise democratic institutions and public sector processes for the 21st century, including: innovative public administration and new ways to guarantee quality and incisiveness of public administration (through an indirectly managed action); trust in governance and the Rule of Law, including independence and efficiency of the judiciary; ecosystem-based approach to public decision- and policymaking, combined with foresight and anticipatory governance.

The destination will seek synergies with other relevant EU programmes, in particular for the uptake of research results and innovative solutions developed under Horizon Europe. Interaction – among others – with the following programmes is encouraged: Digital Europe (DIGITAL), Technical Support Instrument, CERV (Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values), Erasmus+, ESF+ and Global Europe: Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument.

Applicants are encouraged to consider, where relevant, the services offered by the current and future EU-funded European Research Infrastructures, particularly those in the social sciences and humanities domain[3]. Where applicable, proposals should leverage the data and services available through European Research Infrastructures federated under the European Open Science Cloud, as well as data from relevant Data Spaces. Particular efforts should be made to ensure that the data produced in the context of this destination is FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable).

To maximise the impacts of R&I under this Destination in line with EU priorities, international cooperation will be encouraged whenever relevant in the proposed topics.

[1] Political Guidelines for the next European Commission 2024-2029, https://europa.eu/!wywg4P. p. 23

[2] https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2023-07/SFR-23_en.pdf

[3] For a full list see https://ri-portfolio.esfri.eu/ri-portfolio/table. In the social sciences domain, see for example: CESSDA - Consortium of European Social Science Data Archives (https://www.cessda.eu/), ESS – European Social Survey (https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/), SHARE - Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (https://www.share-eric.eu/) or the European Holocaust Research Infrastructure (https://ehri-project.eu/)

Eligibility & Conditions

General conditions

1. Admissibility Conditions: Proposal page limit and layout

As described in Annex A and Annex E of the Horizon Europe Work Programme General Annexes.

Proposal page limits and layout: described in Part B of the Application Form available in the Submission System.

The page limit for the Part B of the Research and Innovation (RIA) application using lump sum is 50 pages. In addition, it is mandatory to submit a detailed budget table, using the template available in the Submission System.

2. Eligible Countries

As described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.

A number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon Europe projects. See the information in the Horizon Europe Programme Guide.

3. Other Eligible Conditions

As described in Annex B of the Work Programme General Annexes.

4. Financial and operational capacity and exclusion

As described in Annex C of the Work Programme General Annexes.

5a. Evaluation and award: Award criteria, scoring and thresholds

As described in Annex D of the Work Programme General Annexes.

5b. Evaluation and award: Submission and evaluation processes

As described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes and the Online Manual.

5c. Evaluation and award: Indicative timeline for evaluation and grant agreement

As described in Annex F of the Work Programme General Annexes.

6. Legal and financial set-up of the grants

Eligible costs will take the form of a lump sum as defined in the Decision of 7 July 2021 authorising the use of lump sum contributions under the Horizon Europe Programme – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027) – and in actions under the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community (2021-2025). [[This decision is available on the Funding and Tenders Portal, in the reference documents section for Horizon Europe, under ‘Simplified costs decisions’ or through this link: https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/ls-decision_he_en.pdf]].

In addition, as described in Annex G of the Work Programme General Annexes.

Specific conditions

described in the [specific topic of the Work Programme]

Support & Resources

Online Manual is your guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.

Horizon Europe Programme Guide contains the detailed guidance to the structure, budget and political priorities of Horizon Europe.

Funding & Tenders Portal FAQ – find the answers to most frequently asked questions on submission of proposals, evaluation and grant management.

Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.

National Contact Points (NCPs) – get guidance, practical information and assistance on participation in Horizon Europe. There are also NCPs in many non-EU and non-associated countries (‘third-countries’).

Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.

IT Helpdesk – contact the Funding & Tenders Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.

European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues.

CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk and ETSI Research Helpdesk – the European Standards Organisations advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal.

The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment – consult the general principles and requirements specifying the roles, responsibilities and entitlements of researchers, employers and funders of researchers.

Partner Search help you find a partner organisation for your proposal.

Latest Updates

Last Changed: September 17, 2025

CALL UPDATE: PROPOSAL NUMBERS

Call HORIZON-CL2-2025-01 has closed on 16/09/2025.

1122 proposals have been submitted.



The breakdown per topic is:

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-01:        16

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-02:        5

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-03:        23

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-04:        18

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-05:        80

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-06:        6

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-07:        45

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-08:        46

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-09:        65

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-10:        91

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-11:        15

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-12:        3



HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-03 :           76

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-04 :           78

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-05 :           34

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-06 :           14

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-07 :           49

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-08 :           24

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-09 :           20



HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-01 :           51

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-02 :           29

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-03 :           16

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-05 :           14

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-06 :           27

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-07 :           71

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-08 :           77

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-09 :           96

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-10 :           21

HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-11 :          12



Evaluation results are expected to be communicated in February 2026.

Last Changed: August 19, 2025

Please read the published frequently asked questions and answers in the `Topic Q&A` section of the topic.

Last Changed: June 10, 2025

Please note that the technical issue has been solved and the details of the Destination of the topic are now displayed on the topic page.

Last Changed: June 2, 2025

Please note that the topic page does not display the description of the destination due to a technical issue, but the full description of the 3 destinations (Democracy, Heritage, Social and Economical Transformations) that are relevant for the call are available in the Work Programme 2025 “Culture, creativity and inclusive society”. Please select from the Work Programme the destination relevant to your topic and consider the description when preparing your proposal.

Last Changed: May 16, 2025
The submission session is now available for: HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-01, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-06, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-09, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-07, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-08, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-05, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-04, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-09, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-07, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-12, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-06, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-10, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-09, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-06, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-05, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-02, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-03, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-04, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-01, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-HERITAGE-03, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-11, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-02, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-03, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-11, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-07, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-05, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-TRANSFO-08, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-10, HORIZON-CL2-2025-01-DEMOCRACY-08
The autocratic appeal: nature, drivers and strategies | Grantalist